Eric , er I mean CB
Why do you even care about LOA 93 - it is not the contract you operate under!
Lets be truthful here - you just want the Nic so you can take advantage of the attrition coming to the East pilots.
Although I am disappointed with many issues on the East - we are capturing our attrition quite fairly right now, and we don't plan on giving that up.
You should just be happy that your on a "better contract". If you really wanted to move forward with the East - why is their no discussions anymore about conditions and restrictions that we BOTH could live with. (for example - if a west pilot wants to bid East - he has to use DOH - if a East guys wants to bid West - he has to use Nic, and if we can get the company to agree to a minimum fleet and block hours for both East and West - do you think that could work?
If/when the judge rules in the latest court battle - either way - the courts cannot take away mine or YOUR right to vote for a CB.
I know we both agree we are ready to get a better contract for both - but at what cost?
Respectfully,
Metrojet
MJ (Who ever you are);
I'm not Eric. He has much better things to do with his time than to unsuccessfully school you.
I "care" because I am attempting to communicate with the lurkers (who are not a part of the 18+ DOH Jhihadist minority) that would perhaps like to get out from under LOA93, and to a better contract.
I want a completed merger because I am sick and tired of the nonsense that spews from the rudderless ship we call USAPA. Guess what? I'm not the only one, AND those folks are not PHX based pilots.
We don't need much, just 600+ to move things back on track. Let's face it: Your group has attempted to evade the Nicolau award because you feel entitled to the attrition on the east coast bases, and it drives you NUTS that you can't ultimately get a court to see it your way.
You are right about the vote. I get one, you get one, and any MIG gets one. A ratified contract takes only 50% +1. The beauty of a ratified contract is that your co-worker can say..."Oh, I voted NO!", and you will NEVER now the difference.
My personal bar will be (at least) the AWA contract with the current DAL wage for various aircraft. I'll bet you a case of Samuel Adams that a contract like that would be ratified by 65% (at least).
The cost for a new contract is already too high: 10 Million on Seham's slam dunk, our 3+ million to defend a final and binding seniority list, the Hundreds of thousands spent on the RICO folly (and our money to defend it), the loss of 4+ years of contract improvements (you do realize that IF we had voted in a Kirby + 11% 3 years ago there would have been NO FURLOUGHS because we would have brought the east UP to our VACATION levels??), and the loss of 4+ years of additional wages. ALL FOR THE IMMORAL, UNETHICAL, AND ILL CONCEIVED CHASE FOR THE DOH GOLD STANDARD. What a pity.
See you in the voting booth. CB (Not Eric).