EMB170Pilot
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2004
- Posts
- 1,576
Keep in mind your gain is always someone elses loss. You may be the next one to lose how will you feel?
I do not see this happening at RAH.
Soooooo bring on the 170s/175s/190s!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Keep in mind your gain is always someone elses loss. You may be the next one to lose how will you feel?
As a former regional Capt who is now at a Major, there exsists the possibility that I could be furloughed in the fall. I personally don't think it will happen, just posturing from the company... but if it does, and we park 737's while growing Q400 operations then some sort of agreement has to be worked out between the management of the 2 companies and the pilots of the 2 companies!
If a mainline/Legacy carrier parks mainline aircraft and furloughs pilots WHILE they grow the express carriers to replace that mainline flying, then those new aircraft at the express carrier should be crewed by some sort of furloughed pilot ratio.
It is not taking jobs away from the regional carrier if it is new aircraft that they are crewing.
At the same time, it behooves the regional feeders to work with mainline to ensure mainline doesn't go out of business.
As a former regional Capt who is now at a Major, there exsists the possibility that I could be furloughed in the fall. I personally don't think it will happen, just posturing from the company... but if it does, and we park 737's while growing Q400 operations then some sort of agreement has to be worked out between the management of the 2 companies and the pilots of the 2 companies!
Always
Motch
As a former regional Capt who is now at a Major, there exsists the possibility that I could be furloughed in the fall. I personally don't think it will happen, just posturing from the company... but if it does, and we park 737's while growing Q400 operations then some sort of agreement has to be worked out between the management of the 2 companies and the pilots of the 2 companies!
Always
Motch
Possibly true, but irrelevant nonetheless.
Your management (with permission from your pilot group, presumably) decided to farm Express flying out to OTHER airlines under a CONTRACTUAL arrangement. Unless your pilot group has a CONTRACTUAL arrangement with that OTHER airline, you have no more right to those seats than they do to yours. And no, it makes no difference who leased the airplanes or buys the gas or books the tickets.
Express carriers are CONTRACTORS to your management. Is it a good arrangement? I don't think so, but that's the situation. You want to dictate terms to another corporation, it'll probably cost you a lot more than you're willing to spend at the negotiating table.
I do not see this happening at RAH.
Soooooo bring on the 170s/175s/190s!!!
more regional pilots who will salivate at more e-jets and flying.....but at the severe expense of mainline pilots and their jobs....sad but very true
and these same regional pilots will scream bloody murder if another regional 'steals' their rightfullly earned flying....completely dumbfounding.
If a mainline/Legacy carrier parks mainline aircraft and furloughs pilots WHILE they grow the express carriers to replace that mainline flying, then those new aircraft at the express carrier should be crewed by some sort of furloughed pilot ratio.
It is not taking jobs away from the regional carrier if it is new aircraft that they are crewing.
At the same time, it behooves the regional feeders to work with mainline to ensure mainline doesn't go out of business.
As a former regional Capt who is now at a Major, there exsists the possibility that I could be furloughed in the fall. I personally don't think it will happen, just posturing from the company... but if it does, and we park 737's while growing Q400 operations then some sort of agreement has to be worked out between the management of the 2 companies and the pilots of the 2 companies!
Always
Motch
It's pretty simple really. United's head crook just has to be convinced that without providing these folks seats, the UAL pilots will scuttle the ship.
He then goes to the head crooks/prostitutes at the regionals and says - "whichever one of you sluts wants the contract, you're gonna have to give us captain seats as a condition of the contract".
Any number of small-time RJ CEO crooks will jump on this deal.
The operative point here is that the UA pilots gotta convince Uncle Glenn that they'll burn it down otherwise -- a task they've not been up to thus far.
PIPE
Why would the top 80% of the list risk everything to ensure the 20% of furloughees have jobs? What's in it for them? I am sure the over age 60 crowd wil be all over it.The operative point here is that the UA pilots gotta convince Uncle Glenn that they'll burn it down otherwise -- a task they've not been up to thus far.
PIPE
So if I resign after 8 years and go to any airline, (SWA UPS FDX Emirates AAL UAL USAir you name it) I get to go back to a captain position at my previous carrier in the event the airline I chose furloughs me. Must be nice!!!
These guys took the chance to go to another airline. No one forced them to.
EXCELLENT POST!
Sad but true, however I feel this time around if UAL does furlough (pretty sure we will but still an if) I will FIGHT hand and fist to secure LEFT seat jobs for our furloughed bubba's. We already have movement in that direction underway,
Here comes more Jets For Jobs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No kidding-of course, who's giving and who's getting..........?In the end though I was told it feels more like Jets 4 BloJobs.