CAL EWR B737
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2005
- Posts
- 652
And this is going to make all the difference. When each side hires the best experts they can to crunch the "career expectations" numbers and present them to the neutral party, from what I've seen at CAL, I just don't think CAL can go toe-to-toe with UAL in this scenario and get any kind of a fair deal.
Heck, CAL pilots have had how many changes of leadership (union and otherwise) in the pilot group in the past 10 years? They can't even get it together and stabilized within the pilot group, much less get an equal shake vs management in the last contract, or a fair deal vs UAL ALPA. Just last week a new LEC was voted in at IAH. Nothing is settled at CAL.
UAL ALPA won't be looking for a "fair deal" and they shouldn't. They will come to the table with the most expensive, professional, cut-throat group of dispassionate representatives they can hire to get the absolute most they can. Unless CAL looks at it that way too so that the neutral party can reach a fair compromise, the compromise will be all CAL's.
I've got to raise the BS flag on this one.
It's not up to the pilots on this forum or either airline to debate other than for speculation and it has absolutely not bearing on the ultimate outcome. With the leadership change in IAH our MEC is now solid and no weaker than our UAL counterparts. I worked my a@@ off as the EWR lead in the IACP/ALPA merger campaign most importantly for one reason ALPA merger policy.
ALPA merger policy is a fair process that will be ultimately determined by a neutral arbitrator period. Based on the equities each party brings to the table nothing more and nothing less. By the way our merger committee and counsel are as good as any in the business.
I was one of the principals involved in the Super Bowl Sunday 98 potiental merger with DAL. I can tell you back then the CAL pilots would have been screwed period. Today is a whole different ball game.
Last edited: