Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Uncle Jerry's Visit to The ASA Crew Rm

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
It's good to know that there is light at the end of the tunnel. Hopefully we get a contract that allows us to move forward in this deal with a good amount of compromise between both management and our pilot group. I tend to agree with Irish- Danny and Nick are great guys, but don't necessarily represent the path or the change that I'M looking for. Hence, I'm running out of candidates to vote for and it narrows the ballot.
 
thougt you were coming last night for that "beer" I promised you...what happened? Get lost on your way or is all that "billy bad a$$" talk just that? hmmm. Yeah, I thought so.

1. I don't drink!

2. If I did I would only drink with those I choose to associate with!

3. I would not choose to associate with an anti-union, pro-management, ALPA volunteer basher like you.

4. I didn't want you to waste an hour of your family time. You can't do ALPA work because you want to spend more time with the family. I suggest you stay out of the bars and off the keyboard and that should provide all the time your family could stand with you.

5. I didn't respond to your PM because I had rather do my Jepps revisions than associate with you.

6. Next time you attend an LEC meeting you can share your anti-ALPA feelings with all of the attendees. Maybe you can call the CNC members liars there as well.
 
Last edited:
Who the heck are you taking a poke at? You are the coward who lacks the testicular fortitude and conviction of beliefs to stand up and be counted in the crew lounge.

This is FI. Your opinion means exactly jack $hit until you stand up and tell people what you believe in a real life forum, like the crew lounge or an MEC or LEC meeting.

RIght now you are just another cowrdly, sniping, Flight Info jerkoff.

Why are you "stay the course" guys so nasty towards anyone who questions that course? You can be pro-union and still question the union. Grow up and quit attacking people just because they have different opinions.
 
Why are you "stay the course" guys so nasty towards anyone who questions that course? You can be pro-union and still question the union. Grow up and quit attacking people just because they have different opinions.

I respect people that stand up and let their opinion be known.

I respect people that disagree with the current course the MEC is on, even though they are in the minority.

I have ZERO respect for cowards on FI who say one thing behind an anonymous keyboard, but never voice a word in a crew lounge or meeting where it counts.

Flight Info rants have ZERO credibility. Come to an LEC and speak yur mind, your opinion counts and SHOULD be heard.

How do we know that all these posters are even ASA pilots and not mgt or F&H $hit disturbers?

I never hear the likes of ohplease or you in the crew lounge. I have flown with exactly ONE pilot who first hand spoke the LJ/JB mantra. ONE.

So until all you dissenters come forward and make your opinions and feeling known to the MEC in a forum where you can be indentified and there for given some credibility, it is just noise.

Clear enough?

Stand up for what you belive and you will be counted, and respected. Snipe on Flight Info, and you will be ridiculed.

It's really quite simple.
 
I like both Danny and Nick. I have worked with both of them and they are good people. However they represent the same thing we have now. Danny was on the MEC, and Nick is the strike committee chairman. The current approach isn't working. Asking for the moon, hoping for a release, and watching 70's go to Skywest isn't a viable plan for me. I am voting for the LJ Coalition - its time to get this done and move on.

Then Irish, you are not very smart! They will sell your soul down the road, and if you think that is better than what we have now, then you better WAKE UP!! The idiot group you are thinking of voting in are nothing more than a bunch of mgmnt lackeys who will sell your and everyother pilots soul down the road! They are PATHETIC individuals! But if that is who you think will do such a good job for you.....well then you might as well Bend Over and get ready for the Big Screw Job!!
 
I guess he was laughing when ASA is at the bottom of every list on time, baggage, deined boarding !!! Keep up the good owrk.... dragging your feet pilots IT IS WORKING !!!! When ESPN tells everyone on Saturday morning football that ASA sucks you know it is bad !!
 
I guess he was laughing when ASA is at the bottom of every list on time, baggage, deined boarding !!! Keep up the good owrk.... dragging your feet pilots IT IS WORKING !!!! When ESPN tells everyone on Saturday morning football that ASA sucks you know it is bad !!

Well not to defend a flawed operation and a draggin a$$ company but...

BAGGAGE......Delta Main Line does that (90% are late because they have to check in with their parole officers.)

Denied Boarding.....Many things come to mind but, ASIG does a great job when they SHOW UP on over-fueling.

ON TIME..... When we are not parking at C, then have to go to D to get the next flight due to an archaic airport design (and the wonderful and motivated ramp staff that park everyone right away), we get right on the job.

However, when the cabin needs to be cleaned, the FA needs catering and we need gas; then bodies to push the damn plane back and remember to give us the paperwork, we can leave.

In short, JA really needs to look internally at HIS mgmt. to see the reason for his laughing. I would love to see him the crew lounge, and I would love to be a fly on the wall when he gets the memo that his pilots voted to UNIONIZE!
 
Fortunately not NEARLY enough to vote those 4 IDIOTS in....Thank Goodness!

Yea because you have really had all the answers before. Yeah what was that about all the plane transfers being stopped? Oh wait it is still going on. Maybe if you looked at the transfer schedule first. Lets face it sir you are in the minority. Your anger blinds you. Your pilot group will vote for what they think is best and you have no control over that. Not gloating just fact. I am not proud of what is going on but it is what it is.
 
I respect people that stand up and let their opinion be known.

I respect people that disagree with the current course the MEC is on, even though they are in the minority.

I have ZERO respect for cowards on FI who say one thing behind an anonymous keyboard, but never voice a word in a crew lounge or meeting where it counts.

Flight Info rants have ZERO credibility. Come to an LEC and speak yur mind, your opinion counts and SHOULD be heard.

How do we know that all these posters are even ASA pilots and not mgt or F&H $hit disturbers?

I never hear the likes of ohplease or you in the crew lounge. I have flown with exactly ONE pilot who first hand spoke the LJ/JB mantra. ONE.

So until all you dissenters come forward and make your opinions and feeling known to the MEC in a forum where you can be indentified and there for given some credibility, it is just noise.

Clear enough?

Stand up for what you belive and you will be counted, and respected. Snipe on Flight Info, and you will be ridiculed.

It's really quite simple.

Some of us don't want to subject ourselves to the absolute disgraceful and meanspirited attacks from the "hold the line or shut em down" crowd. Some of us actually enjoy being ALPA volunteers, and don't want to jeopardize that by speaking out publicly. Some are just tired of the whole thing and don't feel like they are being heard anyway.

You need to take some of your own advice Pogue. You said:

"Stand up for what you believe and you will be counted, and respected. Snipe on Flight Info, and you will be ridiculed"

I see the LJ coalition standing up for what they believe, while you and others are the ones "sniping on Flight Info" - maybe it is your side that is being ridiculed?

The silent majority is going to speak thru the ballot.
 
1. I don't drink!

Man, you shouldn't admit that. Because after your endless and pointless tirades and childlike temper tantrums, you should maybe have an excuse for acting like a total moron.

Maybe you're a drug user, that might explain some of it?

Maybe your parents were actually cousins? (you know the old saying "nothing like luvin when you're getting it from your cuzin")

Maybe you forgot to put your helmet on when you played football?

Maybe your car has a muffler leak?

Maybe it's just that you can't see the industry for what it is today and get out of the past? But if you said you were a cronic boozer that might explain some of your retarded comments.

You were so close to having an excuse, you've blown it again.....
 
they'll never release those figures. they'll tell you they don't have those figures. truth is, that would be too much info. for you minions to have.

If they don't release the figures, then they are trying to hide it because it shows that the pilot group isn't happy. If they don't release it, every pilot should call their reps. and demand that they release it.
 
If they don't release the figures, then they are trying to hide it because it shows that the pilot group isn't happy. If they don't release it, every pilot should call their reps. and demand that they release it.

Why do you care? The vote is what matters, not the nominations.
 
Why do you care? The vote is what matters, not the nominations.

Why would it matter if the actual numbers were published? What harm could there be in publishing the number of nomination votes? Quit hiding information from the membership. 7 to 1 shows that the membership has doubts about our current strategy. This brings into doubt the information we are being fed about Wilson polling.
 
Hopefully we get a contract that allows us to move forward in this deal with a good amount of compromise between both management and our pilot group. ...Danny and Nick are great guys, but don't necessarily represent the path or the change that I'M looking for.

Change for change's sake is poor logic.

"...a good amount of compromise between both management and our pilot group"

......Okay, so every time the negotiating committee moves by 10%, management moves by 0.25%. And you blame our current MEC for the lack of progress? Should we just put in new members who will agree to their 0.25% raise just so we can sign a deal? What's the point? I prefer to allow the current MEC to continue to negotiate for what the pilots continue to indicate that they want in poll after poll.
 
I don't really care about the numbers. It just goes right along with the "refusal" (call it whatever you want to but, saying "we don't have those numbers" isn't an honest anwer) to tell the % change by both sides since the negotiations began.

All that matters is that I have a choice to vote for someone outside the current clique. And make no mistake about it, there IS a clique. Don't think so???? try asking a question during an LEC meeting that doesn't "toe the party line" and see how many people try to "beat you down".
 
Change for change's sake is poor logic.

"...a good amount of compromise between both management and our pilot group"

......Okay, so every time the negotiating committee moves by 10%, management moves by 0.25%. And you blame our current MEC for the lack of progress? Should we just put in new members who will agree to their 0.25% raise just so we can sign a deal? What's the point? I prefer to allow the current MEC to continue to negotiate for what the pilots continue to indicate that they want in poll after poll.

1. On pay, our side hasn't moved 10%. In fact, I believe management has moved more on payrates than ALPA has.

2. How do we know the polling data is correct? Do you really think the majority of pilots are still holding out for a retirement plan and to keep the instructor section the way it it? I don't think so.

3. I want a big raise also, but I want to stop the transfer of assets even more. If we cant stop the transfer of assets without giving up the big raise I want, then protect the jobs before you fight for the big raise.
 
Change for change's sake is poor logic.

"...a good amount of compromise between both management and our pilot group"

......Okay, so every time the negotiating committee moves by 10%, management moves by 0.25%. And you blame our current MEC for the lack of progress? Should we just put in new members who will agree to their 0.25% raise just so we can sign a deal? What's the point? I prefer to allow the current MEC to continue to negotiate for what the pilots continue to indicate that they want in poll after poll.
hmmm. lets see....I recall mgmt. asking for something like 8% reduction for 700 ca. and a single rate for all fo's (could have been more but, I don't really remember). I also recall ALPA asking for something like 12 or 13 % rate increases (also could have been more...I'm trying to be a little conservative).

Te last offer I saw from BOTH side was ALPA demanding 10 % and and mgmt. coming back with fo split rate (not sinlge rate for all planes) and after 2 years a .25 % ca. on teh 70.....STILL NOT ACCEPTABLE (so don't even try that silliness) BBBBUUUUTTTTT, call me silly here but, I don't see 10% movement from ALPA and I see FAR more than .25% from mgmt. But hey! "We don't know those numbers" so I guess we'll never know for sure. Will we? Nah, didn't think so.
 
I was in the lounge during the visit. After the formalities another FO asked why skywest was hiring so many and we were downgrading captains. Jerry responded that we were "not as cost effective" and skywest provided a better product. Later that night I started thinking, if that's the case then why did Jerry buy us? Surely that would have been researched before making a $500 million purchase. Why are we making such a profit if we aren't "cost effective"? My buddies at Skywest say they're hiring 2 or 3 classes of 70 a month. Jerry said this was not true. If what they say is true (that the rate of hiring will continue until June) that be roughly 1300 pilots. Are these our ASA replacement pilots?
 
hmmm. lets see....I recall mgmt. asking for something like 8% reduction for 700 ca. and a single rate for all fo's (could have been more but, I don't really remember). I also recall ALPA asking for something like 12 or 13 % rate increases (also could have been more...I'm trying to be a little conservative).

Te last offer I saw from BOTH side was ALPA demanding 10 % and and mgmt. coming back with fo split rate (not sinlge rate for all planes) and after 2 years a .25 % ca. on teh 70.....STILL NOT ACCEPTABLE (so don't even try that silliness) BBBBUUUUTTTTT, call me silly here but, I don't see 10% movement from ALPA and I see FAR more than .25% from mgmt. But hey! "We don't know those numbers" so I guess we'll never know for sure. Will we? Nah, didn't think so.

Based on what I have seen from both sides, you are correct. Management has moved more on a percentage basis on payrates. In fact, as far as I can see we have moved very little on payrates and we are still asking for a retirement plan which everyone admits isn't going to happen.
 
I was in the lounge during the visit. After the formalities another FO asked why skywest was hiring so many and we were downgrading captains. Jerry responded that we were "not as cost effective" and skywest provided a better product. Later that night I started thinking, if that's the case then why did Jerry buy us? Surely that would have been researched before making a $500 million purchase. Why are we making such a profit if we aren't "cost effective"? My buddies at Skywest say they're hiring 2 or 3 classes of 70 a month. Jerry said this was not true. If what they say is true (that the rate of hiring will continue until June) that be roughly 1300 pilots. Are these our ASA replacement pilots?
hmm. good question....maybe you should ask ASA ALPA. Keep in mind though that "the 900's were not coming to ASA anyway" and "the SLC 700's won't be transfered to SkyW"...Replaced by JUNE? Doubt it. But, alpa will either get reasonable or we'll be a shell of our former self quicker than you thought possible....he!!, that much even I can guarantee.
 
I think that Jerry would have a better answer than ALPA on that, but maybe I'll ask them. War Eagle, buddy.
 
SkyW will "provide a better product" as long as they stay OUT of the ATL system and off the east coast (I'd like to see their OT and COMP #'s for UAL on the east coast and ORD...not sure they're much better than our DL #'s).

The airspace we share up and down the east coast and the inherant problems with ATL will ALWAYS keep the #'s low (why do you think Southwest and Jetblue won't have ANYTHING to do with ATL?). JA is not a dumb man. He knows this as well as anyone. If ASA can settle a contract that "keeps our costs reasonable", he'll turn ATL back over to ASA (including the 900's) and keep SkyW #'s high.
 
I think that Jerry would have a better answer than ALPA on that, but maybe I'll ask them. War Eagle, buddy.
yeah WAR EAGLE! they weren't very impressive today but, I enjoyed sitting in the sun all afternoon. I just hope next week is an early afternoon game ( not set yet because of TV). Otherwise its gonna be a bit chilly. No matter though, my son and I get to be on the field next week. Wouldn't miss it for the world!
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom