DC10
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2002
- Posts
- 145
If it really was a random mechanical failure why would the CIA take immediate control of the investigation and prevent the NTSB from conducting their own investigation?
The CIA released an almost comical, propaganda rich re-creation of what they claim happened and then prevented any witnesses from testifying who saw anything that didn't agree with the CIA's 'findings'.
Explosive residue was detected on many pieces of wreckage, which were never seen again after the CIA removed them to another location and stated that their own testing on those items showed no residue.
This was absolutely not a fair, unbiased investigation of an accident. The documentary reinforces doubts that many of us have always had about this. It's very apparent that the official findings were made up and that evidence was found to back up their theory, not the other way around.
The CIA released an almost comical, propaganda rich re-creation of what they claim happened and then prevented any witnesses from testifying who saw anything that didn't agree with the CIA's 'findings'.
Explosive residue was detected on many pieces of wreckage, which were never seen again after the CIA removed them to another location and stated that their own testing on those items showed no residue.
This was absolutely not a fair, unbiased investigation of an accident. The documentary reinforces doubts that many of us have always had about this. It's very apparent that the official findings were made up and that evidence was found to back up their theory, not the other way around.