Tough Choice--SWA or UPS?

[Buckaroo]

Please don't flame me!! I am in the fortunate position of having to choose between UPS and SWA. I am in the pool for both and will probably take the first one to give me a class date.

I have 5 factors that I think are important: Job security, pay, benefits, quality of life, and culture. I give Brown the edge on job security and benefits and SWA the nod on quality of life and corporate culture. The last factor is pay. SWA is much better now, especially considering the money you lose at Brown during the first year. But if the new contract comes through, maybe UPS will have the better pay.

Like I said, I am in the pool for both and have at least a few weeks to entertain conjecture. NAy inputs?

Everyone knows that SWA is the holy grail for pilots. You should definitely go for WN. Trust me, you can't beat it. All of our employees are top notch and
we are going to put everyone else out of business after we get the Wright Ammendment repealed.

 

[semperfido]

Everyone knows that SWA is the holy grail for pilots.

....he says with tongue in cheek

 

[WillowRunVortex]

Understand. How about a FEDEX package on an AA flight that the crew knew about? Or putting on the packages on some extra sections on Gemini? Not FEDEX call signs or flight numbers.

It starts getting cloudy for me.

I am going to entertain this notion. Wanna know what would happen at AA if I told the cap that I couldnt fly cause I knew a struck FDX letter was in the belly? Flight wouldnt go. Wanna know why? Cause the cap would have sh1t himself from laughing so hard.

 

[LittleLearBoy]

Which one!

Hello,

My 1.75 cents. I will make is very easy for you. Since you are not sure which one, just take SWA (even if they call second) and you tell UPS that LLB and others who have made there mind up already are still swimming in the pool and would like to get out and dry off.

Done,

Have a nice day.
LLB

 

[Bobby Orr 4]

Everyone knows that SWA is the holy grail for pilots. You should definitely go for WN. Trust me, you can't beat it. All of our employees are top notch and
we are going to put everyone else out of business after we get the Wright Ammendment repealed.

I agree...to a point. Jumpseating on SWA is always a pleasant experience. The employees are genuine and seem to enjoy their jobs. Whenever I do jumpseat on your airplanes I stay motivated to work hard and remain optomistic that I will fly for them in the future.
The Wright Ammendment is anti-competitive IMHO. However I do not see AA going Tango Uniform if the WA is repealed. They will adjust, survive, and eventually profit either way.

 

[TonyC]

To say that no freight would move during the strike is not a correct statement. In 1997, UPS closed the offices of management and asked management types to go to work driving trucks all over the country. A tiny fraction of the cargo moved, but some did nonetheless. I know most of the feeders (non union) flew cargo in and out of SDF during the strike. None of theese men ended up on a scab list.

I hope I didn't say "no frieight would move." I've tried to qualify in each instance that TEAMSTERS would move no freight. If I missed one, I apologize. No Teamsters moved freight in 1997. The IPA honored the 1997 Teamsters strike. If the IPA strikes, UPS Teamsters will honor that strike as well.


I am aware that managers worked through the UPS Teamsters strike of 1997 to move a tiny fraction of their freight. To the best of my knowledge, their efforts only went so far as to deliver the highly perishable and/or valuable freight that was in the system when the strike began. I may be mistaken about the scope of their efforts, but that's immaterial. The point, one more time, is - - UPS Teamsters will honor an IPA strike.


I'm not familiar with specifics of contractor flying during 1997. I can only offer this thought: from the perspective of a pilot, honoring the Teamsters picket line and honoring an IPA picket line are subtly different. In '97, Teamsters were striking, and IPA was honoring the strike. Any injury done by contract flyers was done to Teamsters. Their efforts were not threatened by a fleet of Lears. Add to this the question of whether those charters would have been flown by IPA pilots in the first place, and you have a very complex scenario to reconstruct. Have you eaten any Diamond brand canned or bagged walnuts or walnut pieces lately? If so, you're guilty of disregarding a boycott, but not of scabbing. The same applies for R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. cigarettes (Best Value, Camel, Century, Doral, Eclipse, Magna, Monarch, More, Now, Salem, Sterling, Vantage, and Winston), Echostar Dish Network, and Black Entertainment Television (BET cable television, Action pay-per-view, and BET on Jazz) as well as the Big League Theatricals Road Company performance of "Miss Saigon." (More at www.unionlabel.org - Boycott List)

Let's for a moment assume that those flying the charters in '97 were indeed by all rights deserving of the label "scab." (I said assume, so don't bother arguing why they shouldn't. Just follow along for a second, OK?) Let's also say that they got away with it, and nobody knows, and nobody ever will know. They might be sitting right next to an IPA pilot in a UPS cockpit at this very moment, and nobody's the wiser. So what? Does that mean it will be OK in the future to scab? Does that mean that the '97 scab will jump in and defend a 2005 scab by pointing out that HE scabbed back then, and he's OK, so the 2005 scab is OK, too? Does that make the '97 scab immune himself to scabbing in 2005? Not hardly. What happened then is of no matter. (OK, relax, hypothetical over. )



In the event of an IPA strike, I believe IPA will make it very simple to identify struck work, and will make the ramifications of flying struck work very clear.






.

 

[Below Mins]

Tell them that you don't have the honor or integrity to advise a snake.


The right thing to tell them is "Don't fly struck work." It's also very simple.


If you can't tell them the right thing, don't tell them anything at all.

TonyC, I couldn't have said it better myself. Any advice that WillowRunVortex gives must be taken with a grain of salt. The younger guys that he "mentors" must realize that any decision they make may have undesireable consequences (i.e. branded a SCAB) and will affect them for the rest of their careers.

 

[TonyC]

How about a FEDEX package on an AA flight that the crew knew about?

That happens every day. I would consider it freight that AA would have flown anyway, not struck work.

Or putting on the packages on some extra sections on Gemini? Not FEDEX call signs or flight numbers.

Extra means FedEx would have been doing it were it not for the strike. Struck work.


If it's work that would have been performed by the group withdrawing their services, it's struck work. Don't even worry about a call sign or flight number - - that's irrelevant. Those can be made up overnight. (We could begin a discussion of scheduled versus supplemental here, but that would be pointless. Just don't even worry about the call sign.)


Again, in the event of an IPA strike, I believe IPA will make it very simple to identify struck work, and will make the ramifications of flying struck work very clear.





.

 

[capt. megadeth]

OK, Now I would like you to give me the info I should tell these 2 young folks, (one with a newborn), when they refuse a UPS trip and predictably, are fired and immediatly loose their income. I dont want to hear about dignity, I want real answers to real questions, such as what will I do to put food in my baby's mouth?

1. Live below your means

2. Save money so you have at least 6 months funding

3. Don't have a baby unless you have #2

4. Marry someone that can carry the load (ie. HAS A FRIGGIN CAREER or income potential) if you ever can't (ie. strike)

Sorry, I don't buy the "I am a scab because I needed to put food on the table" b.s. Should've had a back up plan.

 

[TonyC]

If I may be so bold as to digress to the original question in this thread...



SWA or UPS?

I have 5 factors that I think are important: Job security, ...

I believe that both companies offer job security. I would have stated the same about Pan Am, United, or Delta many years ago. I believe the freight business, and more specifically, the express package business, offers more security and stability than the passenger industry, in general. Therefore, I would give UPS the win in this column.

I do NOT agree with the assertions of some that a UPS pilot can be more easily replaced.


The Railway Labor Act equally protects both pilot groups.






.