Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
What high standard would that be? Oh, you mean actually being a PROFESSIONAL PILOT? Who the hell tries to take off with only one engine running???However... If you are going to hold them to such a high standard...
As far as one of the posters talking about single-engine taxis, you must not jumpseat much on Major carriers. Quite a few of them do it, including Southwest and AirTran. Haven't heard of any of THOSE pilots trying to take off with one engine.
You get the wrong flaps setting? OK, fine, you get the takeoff config warning, reject the T/O, exit the runway, re-set and re-run the checklist slower and more methodically, no harm no foul. But the engine? Are you F***ing SERIOUS??!!
Agreed. Hellooooo.... "EICAS checked? - Clear". Ummm, what's with the extra 4 or 5 Warning and Caution messages? Oh yeah, an engine's not running..."The mistake was only corrected because engineers have ALMOST completely idiot proofed the cockpit. How long would it have taken them to figure out what was going on without the T/O config warning?
I don't understand how you all think these kinds of mistakes are acceptable. Obviously they didn't even glance at the EICAS before taking the runway.
Yes, I've flown the RJ - an engine not running has enough Caution and Warning messages that this simple step makes it almost impossible to miss... Seriously, WTF??
Now after this rant, if I find out this was all a hoax, then fine, excuse my rant, but seriously, if it WASN'T?? I don't agree with calling the Feds (and certainly NOT calling the media), but if I was this guy's chief pilot, both pilots would be sitting through FULL Initial training again (with the cut in pay that it comes with), the Capt busted down to an F/O for a year, and the entire pilot pool notified that the next person to do it would be looking for a new job.
You give people the chance to fix their mistakes,,, NOT hang them out to dry with the FAA and the media.