The Skinny on the Age 60 Rule

[Benhuntn]

I just bought an H 1 hummer a 6000 sq ft house a areally nice diamond tennis bracelet. I really need the age to be extended past 60. Maybe with surgery I could make 85. You young kids get over it age sixty is a dinasoar and will give why to age 65+.

 

[b757driver]

Since when, at any time in history, in any occuption, has concern for the unemployed/unhired been a concern?? You set your goals, do your homework or whatever it takes.....to land your job based purely on supporting yourself and/or your family,and hopefully a sense of enjoyment and fulfillment along the way in your chosen profession. Where does stepping aside to allow "the great unwashed masses" to "have a chance" enter into anybody's equation? Where does this "logic" come from??

Furthermore...where do you get the idea/insinuation that the younger ones are "those who really need to make more money"??!?

TP

There never was any logic in the first place when this was brought in! It was pure politics and greed and we all know that.

Change has always been hard for some people but without change there would be no progress. It's surely time to get with the times rather than living in the past.

 

[Phaedrus]

All those advocating for 60+ are doing so for purely moral and ethical reasons, i.e. they're concerned because of the social injustice of "age discrimination".
If you younger bucks could just step and be honest and state your true motive of wanting their seat, earlier rather than later, you'd appear less disingenuous.

 

[hnljay]

The Alpa Support for the age 60 rule isn't a full 61,000 members as stated earlier. Go to this site and you will see the membership is down to just over 50,000. You will also see that our union leaders and organization has enough featherbedding that they need people on properties to fund their payroll. The National ALPA total pay is 44 mill a year??

http://www.unionfacts.com/unions/unionProfile.cfm?id=179

 

[ivauir]

You are assuming that 100% of the eligible pilots will choose to remain, which is not realistic. And many other things could contribute to being stuck at one seniority level for 3 years (or more). This isn't a windfall for retiring pilots any more than the Civil Rights movement was a windfall to minorities. It's making something that has been wrong for years, right.

Hmmmm, what about the recently retired? I have yet to see someone supprt their right to return. So who is disingenuous? Gimme a break, this is gonna cost FOs and aspiring FOs. I am not the one being disingenuous, it is those wishing to occupy my seat for longer than those who went before them. It is now and always has been about the MONEY. Those on the cusp of retiring will score a windfall and the rest of us will sling their gear for longer. That is the econmomic reality.

I am not disagreeing with changing the law, but with how it is being done. The portion of the pilot population about to retire will reap a huge benefit while the already retired will get nothing and the young will bear the burdan. I am supprting a compromise. You can stay, right of return, but you sit shot gun. If that seems unfair I suggest you examine your own motives. Mine are pure - I want more money.

 

[ROJO]

Glad I left.

Oh man, what a mess. I left my job at a regional a few years ago to find a new career. Best move I ever made. I spent many nights staring at the ceiling fan wondering if I'd made the right choice. Now it seems pretty clear I did.

I feel bad for all you folks out there. Maybe ALPA or some other collective pilot group could figure out a way to create a pension fund to cover all member pilots? If it was created by pilots, for pilots, it might work.

 

[Klako]

The ICAO Secretariat has recommended a new upper age limit, with restriction to multi-crew, of 65 years. http://http://www.icao.int/cgi/goto_m_med.pl?icao/en/med/age_limit.htm.
This recommendation is based on extensive studies, global experience (data compiled from 63 States) with older pilots, totaling 25,500 pilot-years, and the expressed wish of 93 States. The International Civil Aviation Organization—ICAO, now recognizes the harm of the age 60 rule standard and Proposes to amend the international standard to age 65, which should become applicable on 23 November 2006. http://http://commerce.senate.gov/newsroom/printable.cfm?id=249035.

The Burns substitute amendment to The U.S. Senate Bill S. 65, if voted into law by the U.S. Congress, would direct the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Secretary to adopt the ICAO standard or recommended practice within 30 days after the ICAO acts on the matter.

The Burns substitute to U.S. Senate Bill S.65 allows pilots, who have previously been terminated or had a cessation of employment at a commercial air carrier because of the Age 60 restriction, to seek re-employment at a commercial air carrier. However, pilots cannot file suit to gain re-employment and cannot file suit to reclaim seniority under any labor agreement in effect between a recognized bargaining unit for pilots and an air carrier engaged in commercial operations.

 

[b757driver]

Oh man, what a mess. I left my job at a regional a few years ago to find a new career. Best move I ever made. I spent many nights staring at the ceiling fan wondering if I'd made the right choice. Now it seems pretty clear I did.

I feel bad for all you folks out there. Maybe ALPA or some other collective pilot group could figure out a way to create a pension fund to cover all member pilots? If it was created by pilots, for pilots, it might work.

You probably made the right decision. Many others like you have thought twice about staying or starting over at their umpteenth carrier. And for what? Security? The people that have that in this industry are fast becoming the minority. I don't know hardly any professional pilots (airline that is) in this country, who are still with their original companies or who have either not been furloughed, laid off or whatever, multiple times. Sooner or later you have to ask yourself when is enough is enough?
Age 60 will not work for everyone. However, the law will be changed, and some people will benefit, others won't. Like previous posters mentioned, life ain't fair and this is another example. And of course, others are only concerned about their own interests and making more and more money. I would venture to suggest that money ain't everything even though it does sometimes make life easier.
So, what did you switch to and how long have you been doing it?

 

[FoxHunter]

The ICAO Secretariat has recommended a new upper age limit, with restriction to multi-crew, of 65 years. http://http://www.icao.int/cgi/goto_m_med.pl?icao/en/med/age_limit.htm.
This recommendation is based on extensive studies, global experience (data compiled from 63 States) with older pilots, totaling 25,500 pilot-years, and the expressed wish of 93 States. The International Civil Aviation Organization—ICAO, now recognizes the harm of the age 60 rule standard and Proposes to amend the international standard to age 65, which should become applicable on 23 November 2006. http://http://commerce.senate.gov/newsroom/printable.cfm?id=249035.

The Burns substitute amendment to The U.S. Senate Bill S. 65, if voted into law by the U.S. Congress, would direct the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Secretary to adopt the ICAO standard or recommended practice within 30 days after the ICAO acts on the matter.

The Burns substitute to U.S. Senate Bill S.65 allows pilots, who have previously been terminated or had a cessation of employment at a commercial air carrier because of the Age 60 restriction, to seek re-employment at a commercial air carrier. However, pilots cannot file suit to gain re-employment and cannot file suit to reclaim seniority under any labor agreement in effect between a recognized bargaining unit for pilots and an air carrier engaged in commercial operations.

www.icao.int/cgi/goto_m_med.pl?icao/en/med/age_limit.htm.

 

[CaptainMark]

Keep dreaming...