~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
Calling me a SCAB? That's pretty serious. Threatening to out my ID? It seems you like to protect yours anonymity for fear of "internet stalkers" but you don't apply that same standard to others? At most, I'd respond that if you are a gentleman, an apology is in order. Who's the tough guy?Back to fins though. He is the one who continually brings up a dfr suit if things don't go the way HE deems is fair.
Quote where you read I advocate a DFR suit. Read, would you? Others have come up with various nightmare scenarios which I have rebutted as unlikely for the following reasons:
- The MEC's have been very careful
- The Reps have been very responsible
- ALPA has been careful and has mostly left this to the MEC's
- Anything that targeted a specific pilot group, or part of that group, for separate and unfair treatment would likely lead to a cause of action which ALPA would want to avoid.
As for outing me, been done, you want the list? PM me your name and e-mail, I'll send it to you. I've been outed more times that Linsay Lohan's alleged bisexual tendencies. However, I'm not at all afraid to discuss our profession, ways to improve our profession, and how we can get there. My honest opinion is our Reps are doing a faultless job in this SLI. There has been excellent representation on both sides.
Bloch pulled a rabbit out of his hat on the "pull out-put in" tool. It may be an excellent way to adjust for NWA's attrition - I dunno. The point of my post on this thread was to say that ALPA is a whole lot better off letting Bloch set some new precedent in SLI than trying to do that themselves.
Bloch does not fall under the DFR standard. ALPA does.
Last edited: