Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Out of how many who laid down their $23,940? I submit again, the percentage of those who are hired against the total number who pay is small indeed.scoot said:I meant 16 Gulfstream PFT'ers hired by Gulfstream.
bobbysamd said:. . . which is the issue. Having a fat checkbook is their sole qualifier for these "jobs." Never mind the alleged qualifications set forth by the P-F-T airlines ( Gulfstream only "requires" a Commercial-Instrument-Multi). Gulfstream operates under Part 121, which means that its FOs are required crew members. Most are P-F-Ters who paid Gulfstream for a job and have taken away work from legitimately-qualified pilots because they could write a check.
How would you like it if you had applied for a job, didn't get it, and learned that someone else got it because he paid for it. What's not to understand?
It's just the same old crap, over and over again.
Sorry but a less qualified person who pays for the job (PFT) is no different than someone with a connection on the inside and gets hired ahead of more qualified people because they have a magic LOR.
Timebuilder said:I think that's false.
Someone who pays for a job affects the professional status of ALL pilots, particularly those at the PFT carrier.
An "inside connection" is how almost ALL corporate jobs are filled, and a large number of others in the 121 world. You don't get recommended unless you can cut the mustard, since no one will make themselves look bad by recommending a "less qualified" person. That means that someone is not hired on an LOR ahead of a "more qualified person." The hiree simply has the additional qualification of having an advocate.
On the other hand though I am guessing that even though they are PFT that a lot of those guys are just as good of a pilot.
Even I have never said that. I have never argued against P-F-T from the safety standpoint. At least for discussion's sake, I've always assumed that a P-F-T pilot is not turned loose unless he/she has passed the requisite proficiency check.Timebuilder said:Being a PFT pilot does not mean that said pilot might not also be a talented or a proficient pilot.
Absolutely, Mr. Time.[T]here is still the damage that PFT does to the professional standing of ALL pilots as being easily manipulated into paying for something that should be a paid position according to respected standards of the industry.
Probably the single digits or less - unless they want to write another check!deadstick said:Has anybody ever seen GIA post openings for CA's? And what % of the folks DON'T get the boot after the 250 hrs?
Is Gulfstream not a commercial carrier? They represent themselves as a Part 121 operation and a Continental Connection airline. That sounds very "commercial" to me.The_Russian said:We all refer to GIA as PFT but it is not. PFT is when you buy a PERMANENT JOB with a commercial carrier.
That is spelled "can't."The_Russian said:Bobby, you may be able to spell, but you cant read man.
What a load of $hit.duksrule said:Sorry but a less qualified person who pays for the job (PFT) is no different than someone with a connection on the inside and gets hired ahead of more qualified people because they have a magic LOR.