ultrarunner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 4,322
What I have found interesting in cases such as this, is the willingness on the part of the underwriter to accept in-house training in lieu of formal simulator-based training from one of the vendors.
I'm prohibited from the former, with my clause requiring 12 month simulator-based training, etc...
Now, we carry a quarter bill. in liability, with a reasonably pricey hull value, so maybe some of the underwriters are not so picky with lower liability limits. However, we didn't see that when we operated with less liability on a lower value airframe with our underwriter...
Interesting...
I'm prohibited from the former, with my clause requiring 12 month simulator-based training, etc...
Now, we carry a quarter bill. in liability, with a reasonably pricey hull value, so maybe some of the underwriters are not so picky with lower liability limits. However, we didn't see that when we operated with less liability on a lower value airframe with our underwriter...
Interesting...