funnyman12
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2006
- Posts
- 289
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not even close.
Oh! Oh!, I'm gonna guess, the German named know it all who can't shut up to save his life?!?!
Max provides a window into the dysfunction that was the AAI MEC. Unbelievable. Send these guys off to negotiate with minimal guidance and throw a sh!t when they come back with a negotiated deal. This lawsuit could get interesting. The first deal should have been voted on, plain and simple.
Yes. You can read the details straight from the horse's mouth: http://www.unbiasedfacts.org/InsideTheRingOfFire.pdf
Good history lesson. But why let the numbers get in the way of making a point?![]()
Max provides a window into the dysfunction that was the AAI MEC. Unbelievable. Send these guys off to negotiate with minimal guidance and throw a sh!t when they come back with a negotiated deal. This lawsuit could get interesting. The first deal should have been voted on, plain and simple.
SWA should have not threatened AT pilots, plain and simple.
SWA should have not threatened AT pilots, plain and simple.
I said, ad nauseum, that SW might pull the non-integration card. No one believed me. NO ONE. The line pilots should have voted their own destiny, not the Magnificent Seven.
I'm not following. Was there not a 4 party agreement signed laying a path to arbitration? Did you believe their threats to be true, but their word on the 4 party agreement to be false? And if you believe there was a non intergration possibility wouldnt SWA have to let every unionized group go as well? Otherwise mccaskil/bond definately apply then if they took just one group? You should have let it go to arbitration after your MEC said it was not good enough. Honestly could the list have been much worse?
Wow, where were you when we were trying to decide what to do? The way you put it all together brings everything into perspective. So simple and concise! You actually used the word "definately" spelled wrong and cite mccaskil/bond so I am sure you are a lawyer or something. Thank you.
I'm not following. Was there not a 4 party agreement signed laying a path to arbitration? Did you believe their threats to be true, but their word on the 4 party agreement to be false? And if you believe there was a non intergration possibility wouldnt SWA have to let every unionized group go as well? Otherwise mccaskil/bond definately apply then if they took just one group? You should have let it go to arbitration after your MEC said it was not good enough. Honestly could the list have been much worse?