Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA Makes emergency landing in Yuma AZ

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
DC-9 series, built like a tank. Southwest will love the 717.

Air Canada 797-dc-9-32- 23 fatalities fire beginning in lav
"...1979, the plane, then serving as Air Canada Flight 680 (Boston, Massachusetts to Yarmouth, Nova Scotia), had suffered an explosive decompression in the rear bulkhead that required rebuilding the tail section and replacing or splicing most of the wiring and hydrau"

Air tran Flt 956, 2000- ATL- dc-9-32- very similar, but lessons learned by the crew


As of March 2009, the DC-9 has been involved in 117 incidents, including 101 hull-loss accidents,[15] with 2,135 fatalities.[16]
Number built: 976

As of May 2010, a total of 303 incidents involving 737s had occurred,[118] including 148 hull-loss accidents[119] resulting in a total of 4,097 fatalities
Number built: 6,687

As of March 2009, the Boeing 717 has been involved in 5 incidents,[30] with no hull-loss accidents and no fatalities.[31] The incidents included an on-ground collision, a hard landing and one attempted hijacking.[30]
Number built: 156

========================
data like this only makes it clear that we can't take our jobs for granted and
must be ready- aviation history has been written in blood and burnt flesh- but no one can throw stones in the fragile glass house of aviation

But I do think we'll love the 717- for a while anyway
 
Last edited:
Blameshifting away from SWA mx

Lets start quoting the NTSB concerning the Aloha accident if it is going to be used to compare the latest SWA accident.

The NTSB executive summary clearly states ALOHA airlines failures not Boeings. The NTSB also sights the FAA failure. In SWA case we all know the FAA is in bed with SWA.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the failure of the Aloha Airlines maintenance program to detect the presence of significant disbonding and fatigue damage which ultimately led to failure of the lap joint a S-10L and the separation of the fuselage upper lobe. Contributing to the accident were the failure of Aloha Airlines management to supervise properly its maintenance force; the failure of the FAA to require Airworthiness Directive 87-21-08 inspection of all the lap joints proposed by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin SB 737-53A1039; and the lack of a complete terminating action (neither generated by Boeing nor required by the FAA) after the discovery of early production difficulties in the B-737 cold bond lap joint which resulted in low bond durability, corrosion, and premature fatigue cracking.

http://www3.ntsb.gov/publictn/1989/aar8903.htm

 
Last edited:
So when you hear of a drug addict do you blame the drug or the person?

You were just using the Aloha convertible to blame Southwest! You can't have it both ways.

Pick a side.

Gup
 
I hear Southwest is going to market a new SKIN CARE treatment.....look out.....
 
How about the 10 million "sources" you paid to the Feds for ummmm, I dunno...compliance?

Bill,

In the past year Delta has been fined $2 million for treatment of disabled customers, $375,000 for abusing canceled compensation policies, $100,000 for delayed bag policies.

Shall I continue?

Gup
 
To all you Southwest haters...... Enjoy, your time now. Go back to watching FoxNews....U all make me sick.

Hope this makes it official and you never consider a career here at Southwest Airlines, cus we don't want you. Oh' whats that, you don't want to work here? - You don't like maing money, you think your contract is better then ours $$ right.

Good, stay where you are

What does watching Fox have to do with hating SWA? Kind of left field, don't ya think? Sounds like you might have deeper issues.

At any rate, congrats working at SWA, its a job envied by many, but definitely not "all".
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top