Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA/AAI SLI agreement in principle.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The numbers were far less, then the MC negotiated them up to 850. If it was up to SWA management, the base would be much smaller. So, the idea that it could be more in the near future is incredibly unlikely.
 
The numbers were far less, then the MC negotiated them up to 850. If it was up to SWA management, the base would be much smaller. So, the idea that it could be more in the near future is incredibly unlikely.


I wonder which ALPA official keeps leaking all of this information before the entire package comes out?
 
Last edited:
I don't know if it's intentional or not in the leaks. I know swapa has been very quite....not sure if that's good or bad. But I do know the leaks from ALPA have put a lot of swa folks in a tail spin. I'm sure everyone knows that if we vote down the sli proposed by Gary we may look very bad to an arbitrator. We are in a very precarious position. With that being said I'm waiting to see the ACTUAL sli. There has already been so much wrong info put out I don't know what to believe!

With that being said I know there are a lot of great people at Airtran. There are great people at swa. I know y'all have busted your butt to make Airtran what it is. But please know we all have done the same at swa. I've had more than one shirt soaked with sweat pulling strollers out for the ramp guys. We got screwed by age 65 so of course we are concerned about this also. I do look forward putting this behind us....
 
if we vote down the sli proposed by Gary we may look very bad to an arbitrator
No true, process agreement prohibits consideration of all things prior to arbitration. When arbitration starts, the game starts from square one on each side without consideration of previous deals or votes.
 
Thanks scoreboard...and I know the process agreement says that but I still have a concern for it. Trust me I have no problem voting no. But I've decided to wait for the road shows to make my decision. I hope it's not like ta1 and 2...selling a 1979 gremlin for 1 million dollars just because it has a set of nice 20 inch rims...there are so many leaks and wrong info out there you don't know what is real or true. I kind of wish swapa wasn't so quite but I guess I've got to wait out the process.
 
Sorry I mean quiet....da&n iPhone and it's auto spell...I can never remember to turn that function off.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top