Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA 4th Quarter

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Bake

I LIKE THE GEEZER METER!!
Joined
Mar 26, 2002
Posts
699
Associated Press
Southwest Airlines posts a profitable quarter
Thursday January 22, 8:33 am ET


DALLAS (AP) -- Southwest Airlines' fourth-quarter profit rose 57 percent as revenue rose 8.3 percent.
The airline said Thursday it earned $66 million, or 8 cents a share, for the October-December period, up from $42 million, or 5 cents a share, a year earlier.



Operating revenues for the fourth quarter totaled $1.52 billion, up from $1.4 billion in the fourth quarter in 2002.

Chief executive James F. Parker said the airline managed to stay ahead in revenues despite increasing labor and jet fuel costs that helped boost operating expenses by 7.1 percnt.

"As expected, we are experiencing some cost pressures. Our low cost competitive advantage will endure, however," Parker said in a statement.

For the year, the airline said it earned $442 million, or 54 cents a share, compared to $241 million, or 30 cent a share, in 2002. Operating revenues increased 7.5 percent to $5.9 billion for the year from $5.5 billion a year ago.
 
You all must be doing something right. Congrats and keep that SWA attitude that so many others lack.
 
More news....

Southwest just recently exercised 5 options for '05 into firm orders. More good news for future pilot hiring!





Southwest Airlines Co.
Boeing 737-700 Delivery Schedule
As of 12/31/2003
Prior Schedule Current Schedule
Firm Options* Firm Options*

2004 47 --- 47 ** ---
2005 23 11 28 6
2006 22 12 22 12
2007 25 29 25 29
2008 6 45 6 45
2009-2012 --- 177 --- 177
Total 123 274 128 269

*Includes purchase rights
**Includes one leased aircraft
 
Funny, on the last trip I flew all I heard from the pilot group was rumor of 4th quarter loss. Glad the amateur analysts were wrong! ;)
 
Speaking of amature analysts....

You guys are on deck tomorrow for Quarterly and YE numbers, and it will be a quarter of marginal profit. Wait till you see the 1st Q numbers. I'm predicting the first Quarterly loss since 91.
 
lowlycfi said:
Funny, on the last trip I flew all I heard from the pilot group was rumor of 4th quarter loss. Glad the amateur analysts were wrong! ;)

We were all talking about the Eagles game.
 
parrots

ivauir said:
Speaking of amature analysts....
You don't consider 8 cents per share marginal? Go look at Airtran or Jetblue when their numbers come out next week. For the size of your company, that's marginal. Without the $41M fuel hedge this Q, where would you be? That's not going to last forever, prices will stabilize.

In the 1st Q of 2003 you guys had a net profit of 3 cents per share with a 58% LF. I think the profit was around $24M. This year you will have that charge of $30M for the reservations center. Mr. Parkers stated the following looking forward: "Although the first half of January 2004 showed modest unit revenue growth, bookings suggest that January's load factor could fall below last year's performance of 58.0 percent." Maybe that's why the big sales are happening systemwide. Couple that with the new competition in New England, and it's going to be close this Q.

Hey Kansas - It's, look for the order. If you're gonna raze me, get the quote right.:D :)
 
Without the $41M fuel hedge this Q, where would you be?

Guess it's a good thing the company did go ahead a do that hedging thing. How about some props for a forward thinking CFO and his team.

This year you will have that charge of $30M for the reservations center.

Taken from a press release on Southwest. com:

"We also recently announced the consolidation of our reservation operations from nine into six Reservation Centers. Although we will incur restructuring charges estimated in the $20 million range in first quarter 2004, we expect ongoing annual operating cost savings to exceed that amount."


The real elephant in the room is the Flight Attendant contract.
I was impressed that one of the Wall Street types did inquire about the negotiations during the conference call Q and A. In 2004, the contract will either be settled with the subsequent increases in labor costs plus the one time charge for retro. Or....the contract won't be settled and the F/A group will be released for self-help whatever form that might take. I gotta think that would have a negative impact on revenue as the negotiations get more press and passengers get jittery and start to book away in anticipation of some sort of work slowdown/stoppage.
 
Last edited:
Lowecur you are coming in Loud and stu..

Lowecur you are coming in Loud and stupik.
As the Drill SGT said in "Full Metal Jacket": "What is your Major Malfunction."

Yes, I watch to many movies, but you don’t even see the glass as half full or half empty. You think the glass was sucked clean by some kind of evil and then smashed into pieces so that it wouldn’t hold water.

And by the way, I am probably the only one too dumb to figure out how to put you on my “IGNORE” list, that is why no one else will probably reply to your Pessimistic thoughts.

Please understand that is an aviation board, it’s for Aviators, those who want to be Aviators, and those that support aviation.

Now on the other hand, if you sent a check in to help pay for this website like the rest of us, then feel free to rant and rave about the sky falling.
 
Last edited:
Careful Opie

Careful Opie: you are a Christian, remember. Check the list, lowecur has every right to post his dribble on this board.

FJ
 
Your Right, I'm sorry

Your Right, I'm sorry

I figured out the ignore list so I will not be tempted to go off again,

thanks FJ for keeping me on the straight and narrow
 
Last edited:
Opie

OPIE01 said:
Lowecur you are coming in Loud and stupik.
As the Drill SGT said in "Full Metal Jacket": "What is your Major Malfunction."
Relax Ope, SWA isn't going unker. They just neek a little tune-up by way of Brazil. :D :D
 
Dude enough with the jungle jet - NOBODY agrees with you - we'll get 7E7s before we go that route.
 
SWAInflt said:
The real elephant in the room is the Flight Attendant contract.
I was impressed that one of the Wall Street types did inquire about the negotiations during the conference call Q and A. In 2004, the contract will either be settled with the subsequent increases in labor costs plus the one time charge for retro. Or....the contract won't be settled and the F/A group will be released for self-help whatever form that might take. I gotta think that would have a negative impact on revenue as the negotiations get more press and passengers get jittery and start to book away in anticipation of some sort of work slowdown/stoppage.
It's my understanding you want $58. per hour, is that correct? That's close to a starting C/A on a 190 at B6. How many hours a month do you work, and when does the $58. kick in on seniority? Of course, I'm sure some of the parrots would be glad to kick in to help.:p :p :p
 
lowecur said:
It's my understanding you want $58. per hour, is that correct? That's close to a starting C/A on a 190 at B6. How many hours a month do you work, and when does the $58. kick in on seniority? Of course, I'm sure some of the parrots would be glad to kick in to help.:p :p :p

Not really sure where the $58 figure came from but it is incorrect. The TWU proposed TFP pay scale will follow the rest of this reply. The average line pays between 90 and 100 TFP per month plus per diem.

The contract would be retroactive to 2002 hence the "old" numbers. If you read the column across you will see the COLA increases at each paygrade thoroughout the life of the contract.



------------6/1/02---6/1/03---6/1/04--6/1/05--6/1/06
mth 1-6----20.21---20.82----21.44-----22.08---22.75
mth 6-12--20.71---21.33----21.97-----22.63---23.31
Year 2-----23.03---23.72----24.43-----25.16---25.92
Year 3-----25.34---26.10----26.88-----27.69---28.52
Year 4-----27.66---28.49----29.34-----30.22---31.13
Year 5-----29.77---30.87----31.80-----32.75---33.73
Year 6-----32.29---33.26----34.25-----35.28---36.34
Year 7-----34.61---35.64----36.71-----37.81---38.95
Year 8-----36.92---38.03----39.17-----40.34---41.95
Year 9-----39.24---40.41----41.62-----42.87---44.16
Year 10---41.55---42.80----44.08-----45.40----46.76
Year 11---43.87---45.18----46.54-----47.93----49.37
Year 12---46.18---47.57----48.99-----50.46----51.98

Here is our current payscale:

14.67 first six months
14.90 second six months
17.34
18.42
20.40
21.48
22.56
24.12
25.60
27.41
29.30
31.27
36.06
37.03
37.93
38.88
40.15
41.26

As you can see the proposed top out rate is well under $58. The step compression would put inflight in line with the rest of the unions at SWA who top out in 12 years while Inflight currently tops out in 17.
 
Last edited:
SWAInflt said:
Not really sure where the $58 figure came from but it is incorrect.

As you can see the proposed top out rate is well under $58.

Actually the $51.98 TFP (6-1-06 step 12) equates to $59.22 per hour when you do the conversion. I think this is where he may have got his info.
 
SWAInflt

SWAInflt said:
As you can see the proposed top out rate is well under $58. The step compression would put inflight in line with the rest of the unions at SWA who top out in 12 years while Inflight currently tops out in 17.
I'm not privy to what the going rate is for an FA, but what we have here is the typical "Mature Successful Airline Employee Syndrome." In other words, everyone wants their fair share for making the airline a success. Many Airline employee groups feel they are underappreciated by management and their pilot group. It's a no win situation in which you argueably have the best Airline Management Team in the Industry that has done a sensational job for the last 30 years putting Southwest at the top of the heap. There's only so much of the pie to go around, and there is a pecking order that has been established. Stock options and profit sharing are no longer what they were years ago. Guarantee's in the form of salary increases have taken there place.

The solution that management has embraced is to grow the airline by 8-10% per year and hope at some point you will take less than you're asking for. They could go back and ask all employees to accept an equitable percentage contract in which each employee group accepts a fixed percentage of the total revenue for the term of the contract. Unfortunately that would not sit well with SWAPA.

It's a tough situation. I wish you well.
 
In other words, everyone wants their fair share for making the airline a success. Many Airline employee groups feel they are underappreciated by management and their pilot group.

Bingo. Except for the part about feeling unappreciated by the pilot group. Our beef is with management...not Flight Ops. We don't work for the pilot group...we work for Jim Parker.

At this point the issue is becoming greater than compensation and work rules. The relationship between The Chairman and his largest workgroup(7,500 and growing) is at stake. We have been unionized for decades...this is not our first contract. In years past negotiations were heated but eventually a contract was signed and we all kissed and made up and went back to the business of making money. Not so with these negotiations. It has been pointed out to me that while Herb was the head of the company...he never sat at the bargaining table with inflight...he delegated that responsiblity to Jim Parker. He (Herb)insulated himself by letting JP take the heat even though JP was taking his marching orders from HK. Now our CEO is also negotiating on behalf of the company so the rancor and bad blood will follow him back to Executive Suite when this is all over. The bitterness that exists amongst the rank and file for Jim Parker is breathtaking. Deserved or not...it's there and it is beginning to destroy our culture. If you want to know what the loss of respect between management and a major labor group can do to an airline...look no further than what is happening with some of the unions over at US right now. I hope we can get this thing settled. Our lives are on hold until it is but it does not look good. The mediator could declare an impasse as early as next month. Mediation has produced zero progress and both sides have said they will reject an offer of binding arbitration. This thing could really start to get ugly right around the time we are launching Philly. The timing could not be worse.

It's a tough situation. I wish you well.

It is indeed. Thanks for good wishes. I'll keep you posted.
 
Interesting Comments by CFO

Kelly made some interesting observations that haven't been brought up yet but I think are pertinent.


Controlling costs is the key to continued profitability which allows the company to reward employees with increasing benefit packages.

- ratio of employees to aircraft end of '02 - 91 employees per plane; end of '03, 86 (may have been 88, memory) employees per airplane -- efficiency is the name of the game..expect this number to continue to decline, see below

- CFO stated he would not be surprised to see the number of employees at the end of '04 to show a flatline for the entire year. How can they do that? PHL will require 40-50 folks initally. Nearly all stations are currently overmanned . There are plenty of internal folks who will take the transfer without requiring a single job fare for new folks. Attrition is occurring in ops/CSA but very few new hires I've heard. Still lots of folks left over from the immediate post-911 security surge hiring

- Several FA classes have been internal hires, saves big money again....folks leaving better paying jobs to start all over again at the lower pay scale. They are doing external FA interviews now. FA contract settlement is a big question, no doubt.

- 3 Res centers closing, 1900 folks impacted. I've heard numbers that range from as few as 500 to as many as 1000 who will depart the company with a package versus moving to a new SWA location.

- More automation will decrease the need for folks. Take the following: 57% of reservations occur on the web. Even less need for more folks in the res centers. SWA is rolling out online check-in which will hopefully lead to more folks doing it on line versus having to wait in line for CSA folks to handle them. We'll always need CSAs, can't do it without them but will we need as many in years to come as we have now? Who knows but more automation can hopefully allow fewer to be hired if that will help the bottome line.

- People talk about the lower quarterly profits. Remember, there will be about $140 (think it is a little larger actually) million distributed for profit sharing for the entire year ($40M per quarter). Folks often forget this is money that is taken off the top & isn't included in the quarterly/annual profit figures but it still comes back to the employees which I think is pretty nice.

- CFO thought the increase in costs will be leveling off in 2qtr. I can't recall that type of optimism on his part forseeing into a qtr down the road but if anyone would know, he would. All of the res ctrs costs are expected to occur this qtr (28 Feb is the closing dates for the LRC, DRC, SLC res center).

- Hedging has kept us in the black & will continue to do so. Our track record is good with it & I applaud the fuel folks who do this. I don't care where the money comes from if it helps the bottom line, kudos!!!

- Our avg fare has gone up for the year to just over $90 from $87. Revenue per seat mile is up. Our costs per seat mile increased only 2.9% despite pay raises, fuel costs & landing fees (huge increases). I believe our costs per mile are still the lowest in the industry.

- Profit increased from '02 to '03 by about $100M (would've been $240 M if profitsharing had been moved over, not bad).

- Winglets are paying off & we're only getting more, improving the efficiency. Average age of -200 fleet, 21 years old, once we get rid of these, this drag on profit will go away at the same time we're getting more fuel efficiency from newer aircraft.

- New software/hardware to get us back in the mail business...very lucrative & easy money....we'll be back in line to get more of that.

- New airport additions coming on line this year to allow for more long haul...rest of HOU with more gates in '04....ISP I believe sometime this year...BWI getting more...PHL will explode within the next 18 months with plenty of gates to choose from....MSY with more gates. Aren't sure about capital expenditures but would seem a lot of that has already occurred but I'm sure there are more plans/buildings to spend it on.

- Expansion in the training center with at least 2-4 more sims planned for. Architecture plans will finalize '04 with some sort of building expansion later this year or next. More sims, more pilots, more planes

- As always, our debt is low & there are "payment bubbles" out there like there are for some of the other carriers, i.e. pension payouts, aircraft payments, etc. Longterm debt is incredibly low compared to other major carriers & some LCC also.


Just a few ramblings from an FO who reads the fine print sometimes. Nothing is gospel of course unless you read it yourself or heard the guy say it yourself!!


Lots of reasons to smile. Critics will continue to disparage, for poolies & wannabees, hang in there continue to look at all options but certainly everyone has a chance at getting an interview & from there everyone has an opportunity to get on with SWA. Good luck. cheers,
 
Chase: Always refreshing to hear from a voice of reason.

A few points I heard in the webcast that I think are also telling:

1:BOD OKs up to $300M of SWA stock buyback in 2004;

2:Full fares inching steadily up, now 37%; and

3:Accelerating -200 retirements: 18 now in 2004 vice, I believe, 15 previously (with the exercising of 5 - 2005 options to firms).

The seas are heavy but SWA has the right people at the helm.
 
Phil & others

Thanks but it is more the voice of following a simple but straightforwrad business plan. The results aren't fancy but they do provide for longievity & job security which I'm rather high on in this day & time. Your points are well taken & I simply forgot to post these tidbits of continued good news. One other fact that Kelly alludes to when asked by one of the reporters is how much space SWA has to expand in PHL. He tap dances but makes it clear the potential is rather unlimited.

What I think he & our planners realize is that if USAir fails to turn things around (I wish their employees nothing but prayers & good luck for all their efforts to right their ship) and stumbles into Chap 7, by being in PHL, SWA will be in a position to provide air service for many folks who may not have USAir as an option. With airplanes to begin arriving this summer at a rate of 1 every 12 days, filling the void at PHL with just these aircraft alone would allow a rapid & profitable build-up IMHO.

The number of employees at the end of '03 was 32847, divided by 387 aircraft equals slightly less than 85 people per aircraft compared to 91 at the end of '02...a 2.3% decrease. The number of folks who aren't transferring from one res center to another turns out to be higher than what I predicted...approximately 1100 folks will depart voluntarily. 80% of fuel hedged at $24 a barrel, 70% for next year at this price. All good news. All of this comes from the Dallas Morning News. The industry is struggling to get back on its feet & we'll see how that all plays out but I like our odds at SWA in continuing toward a 32 yr of profitability & this quarter to be our 52nd qtr of profitability. We can only hope.

cheers,
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom