Yep, Rez, guess I was thinking of someone else.
Yup....
I don't reply to the rest of your posts because it's always the same thing: stay the course, trust ALPA, get involved.
No... get involved. Challenge the leadership. effect positive change. Hint: ranting on FI is not challenging the leaderhip. Calling for a self destructive SOS is not challenging the leaderhip. Coming up with workable solutions is challenging the leadership. Running for office is...
If I'm willing to encourage and participate in a SOS, how does that translate to apathy?
It translates to stupidity and self destructive-ness..
Am I apathetic because I don't do union work now? Maybe that's because I got LAID OFF AFTER 17 YEARS WITH AN ALPA CARRIER. Maybe I wouldn't have gotten laid off if ALPA hadn't thrown my pilot group under the bus (like Pan Am, too). But you wouldn't understand that because it didn't happen to YOU--we're just a page in 'Flying The Line III'.
I won't bore you with my regressive career if you don't bore me.. We've all been hit hard.. let's look to the future.
It's real easy to sit in the office and pontificate, Rez, no one calls you on it.
Cause no one shows up the LEC meetings..
BTW, the first thing I did after AA bought us was get involved in the union on the Jumpseat Committee and sitting in when our elected reps. couldn't be at the BOD meetings. So you can take your apathy claims and shove them.
I am talking all of us. The majority...
ALPA hasn't done squat for any carrier outside of the Big 4 prior to 9/11 and the only success they can claim since then is FedEx. Big deal, I could negotiate FedEx's contract--they can't hide the money.
You da man...
Yeah, Rez, I've got a hard on for people like you. I don't like cheerleaders. All Rah, Rah and no answers. If a course of action isn't working, it's hard to continue supporting it.
I may be seen as a cheerleader however, my issue is guys like you offer no solutions. You are in a lifeboat and you are cursing the boat itself. Claiming the boat sucks and we should reject it and get out of the boat. You hate the boat.
The problem is if you destroy the lifeboat then you are in the water and your survivability is practically nil. I don't get it. Why do you want that?
My ideas may not be right, but at least I'm not pushing an agenda that's been proven to be a failure. TC
Why not promote a majority particaption? We all want the same thing: effective protection of our careers.
Please effectivly debate how promoting a majority of membership particaption will or will not work.
Also debate how an SOS will or will not. If an SOS is such a great idea, then why isn't it so? why haven't we seen a grassroots effort for an SOS? Why aren't EB and EC members pushing it? If it is such a good idea then
someone in the leadership organization would be talking about it....
Regardless if you want an SOS you are going to have to particpate. Wow isn't that what I am advocating? participation?
You can't expect the leadership to push forward an SOS without feeling out the membership and seeing what kind of backing there is... again...if you want an SOS you gotta get particaption...
We both want the same thing... we just have different routes....
[requesting line by line quote and response]