Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Stay and the new UAL or go to SWA?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
depends on what kind of bird is in the hand and what kind of bird is in the bush. If they are the same bird or bird of relatively close value i would agree. But maybe the birds in the bush have so much more value then the bird in the hand it would be worth going after them.
 
depends on what kind of bird is in the hand and what kind of bird is in the bush. If they are the same bird or bird of relatively close value i would agree. But maybe the birds in the bush have so much more value then the bird in the hand it would be worth going after them.


And the bush at SWA is much better lucking than the bush at UAL.
 
Ordinarily, I'd advise anyone in your position to leave UAL for SWA. But in this instance, I'd stay because UAL is now being run by CAL management...and that right there is a huge plus over the old UAL.

I have a friend who was at Fed Ex and left for DAL (when DAL was "all that"). Looking back now...he regrets it. Don't leave CAL because you never know what's going to happen. 10% of the list below you is nothing to scoff at (especially at a huge airline). I think you'd do much better to stay.
 
Why do you believe this, given the recent history? When given the chance for organic growth SWA declined in favor of an acquisition.

Airtran had a lot to offer in respect to what they owned on the east coast. You just cannot create that with slow organic growth. They needed the gates and all that came with them. Not to mention with the exception of one crusty old guy who was bitter that the "junior" guys who have only been their ten years were selling out the retirement of the senior guys, they are a great bunch of pilots. There will be bumps down the road but when you combine two good groups of pilots I do not see how they could screw it up and make a US airways out of it. By the way, the two companys in question (SW and United), I would be honored to work at either one of them.
 
Why do you believe this, given the recent history? When given the chance for organic growth SWA declined in favor of an acquisition.

Once we tap the international cherry Gary will not be able to stop. That plus the "way" we would fly into Atlanta with connections out the wazzu.

We'll be fine here. We just have to get this crap behind us.

Gup
 
What do you mean by "once we tap the international cherry"? Do you think you are going to be some sort of international powerhouse? Out of what hubs. International is a whole different animal and favors the network carriers hub and spoke route systems. AirTran's international flying is not even considered international at AA/CAL/UAL/DAL for crew purposes and cabin service standards. I'm curious why some SWA pilots seem to think that they are suddenly going to go international and kick some ass. It just isn't going to happen unless we are talking about flights to Cancun and Belize or something. You guys tout your RNAV/RNP stuff but we've been doing that for a decade at CAL and AA etc to South American cities like Quito and we're good to RNP values of .15. I think you need a reality check my friend. SWA is one hell of an airline and they are going to become even stronger with the addition of AAI. AirTran has been doing all the right things for over a decade and will add significant value to your airline. That being said, I welcome the competition you think you are going to bring to the international arena.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top