FD109
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2002
- Posts
- 68
Re: In addition to the FARs
Re: the reg quoted above
The incident I am describing happened at PIE with a departure to the south. This put the derarting aircraft below Class B until above 3,000 feet. There was a fed (operations inspector) on the jumpseat.
The aircraft was a DC-9-51
Clean minimum maneuvering speed was 215
Slat Ext/Flaps Ret minimum maneuvering speed was 185
The SID required the aircraft to climb to and maintain 1,600 feet (below Class B)
The captain flew the normal climb profile that called for "cleaning up" at 1,000 feet. He climbed to and maintained 1,600 feet and maintained the min maneuvering speed of 215 knots. (below Class B)
The fed attempted to violate the crew for exceeding 200 kts below class B. His argument was that by leaving the slats extended, the pilot could have complied with the 200 knot restriction and that the company's procedures allowed for this.
Note: This carrier's FCOM contained a statement that it is acceptable to deviate from the standard climb profile above obstruction clearance altitude or 400 feet whichever is higher if necessary to comply with ATC restrictions and for operational reasons at the PIC's discretion.
The fed knew the carrier's manual well and used this statement to try to get the crew.
The violation was finally dropped, but the disagreement on who was right was really never settled.
Comments?
Rvrrat said:
(d) If the minimum safe speed for any particular operation is greater than the maximum speed prescribed in this section, the aircraft may be operated at that minimum speed.
Re: the reg quoted above
The incident I am describing happened at PIE with a departure to the south. This put the derarting aircraft below Class B until above 3,000 feet. There was a fed (operations inspector) on the jumpseat.
The aircraft was a DC-9-51
Clean minimum maneuvering speed was 215
Slat Ext/Flaps Ret minimum maneuvering speed was 185
The SID required the aircraft to climb to and maintain 1,600 feet (below Class B)
The captain flew the normal climb profile that called for "cleaning up" at 1,000 feet. He climbed to and maintained 1,600 feet and maintained the min maneuvering speed of 215 knots. (below Class B)
The fed attempted to violate the crew for exceeding 200 kts below class B. His argument was that by leaving the slats extended, the pilot could have complied with the 200 knot restriction and that the company's procedures allowed for this.
Note: This carrier's FCOM contained a statement that it is acceptable to deviate from the standard climb profile above obstruction clearance altitude or 400 feet whichever is higher if necessary to comply with ATC restrictions and for operational reasons at the PIC's discretion.
The fed knew the carrier's manual well and used this statement to try to get the crew.
The violation was finally dropped, but the disagreement on who was right was really never settled.
Comments?
Last edited: