Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest Airlines Expands Atlanta Service With Two New Nonstop Destinations

  • Thread starter Thread starter SWA/FO
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 40

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Noserider76, you do realize you guys were in BANKRUPTCY a few years ago don't you?

Sure do. What's that got to do with anything? You realize you have been around a fraction of the time most airlines were building the current air traffic infrastructure don't you? You realize you guys were signing 10 year substandard contracts while big airlines were trying to better the pay and work rules for the industry don't you?

Sorry, no ill will toward most SWA employees. Just some of the self-righteous jackasses that seem to be prevalent lately.
 
Last edited:
DL has a habit of crushing ATL competitors


SWA DL's worst night mare.......they will back down just like the brain surgeons at United did in DEN (their words not mine) you know another one of those really great ALPA carriers.

FYI ALPA just took the mother of all beat downs at the hands of SWA and SWAPA, it was good to see an out of control union take it in the a$$ for a change......hope and change is next along with Hoffa and his union thugs that are killing our country, shut them all down......Boeing wins big in South Carolina also

I hate out of control unions
 
I'll concede that SWA coming to ATL is an annoyance to DAL.

I'll concede that DAL would prefer that SWA not operate in ATL.

That being said, ATL is ATL because of DAL and their route network. It really could have been just about anywhere in the region.

Take out DAL and what ATL really is...the part that SWA is competing for, is just another 500k large O&D market. Right between Tucson and Albuquerque

The passenger that is flying from MCO-LHR via ATL is not going to all of a sudden be fying on SWA, regardless of how funny your FA PAs are.

With that it mind, it is hard to imagine SWA CRUSHING Delta when you won't even be competing for the majority of the passengers.

The bigger CRUSHING possiblity comes from the passenger that chooses to go MCO-DAL-LAX vs MCO-ATL-LAX. But that has always been there and has nothing to do with SWA getting into ATL.

Later
 
Last edited:
I was never really concerned about SWA coming to ATL competing against DAL a few months ago and now i'm really not concerned at all about it. At this rate, you will self implode like USAirways
 
March 10, 2012; 4 SWA/AAI 737s non-stop to Vegas vs. 3 DAL 767-300's and 5 DAL 757-200s. I guess that's fights on, if that's what you're looking for.

Just remember, fare wars hurt the profit-sharing checks, but not the exec pay.
 
Can anybody name more than one ALpA carrier that hasn't been through at least one bankruptcy? I think ALpA is batting 100% on bankrupt carriers.

What profound ignorance that you somehow equate legacy carriers going through bankruptcy as an ALPA weakness? Had it not been for ALPA, the pilots would have been hammered even harder while various managements abused the BK courts. Had it not been foe ALPA salvaging what they could, carriers like SWA would be competing with airlines with even cheaper labor costs. You could even make a case that pilots going to work at LCC's like SWA and working longer hours for less pay while being willing to forego traditional retirement plans is what the legacies have had to deal with and has been the reason our profession has slipped backwards after years and years of gains made by the ALPA carriers.
 
March 10, 2012; 4 SWA/AAI 737s non-stop to Vegas vs. 3 DAL 767-300's and 5 DAL 757-200s. I guess that's fights on, if that's what you're looking for.

Just remember, fare wars hurt the profit-sharing checks, but not the exec pay.

It's kind of sad that our profession has descended to pilots thinking kicking each others ass is a positive thing. Thank you SWAPA.
 
Sure do. What's that got to do with anything? You realize you have been around a fraction of the time most airlines were building the current air traffic infrastructure don't you? You realize you guys were signing 10 year substandard contracts while big airlines were trying to better the pay and work rules for the industry don't you?

Sorry, no ill will toward most SWA employees. Just some of the self-righteous jackasses that seem to be prevalent lately.

I just got out of the water at Sunset Point and had 2 glasses of wine, you said it better than I.
 
I'll concede that SWA coming to ATL is an annoyance to DAL.

I'll concede that DAL would prefer that SWA not operate in ATL.

That being said, ATL is ATL because of DAL and their route network. It really could have been just about anywhere in the region.

Take out DAL and what ATL really is...the part that SWA is competing for, is just another 500k large O&D market. Right between Tucson and Albuquerque

The passenger that is flying from MCO-LHR via ATL is not going to all of a sudden be fying on SWA, regardless of how funny your FA PAs are.

With that it mind, it is hard to imagine SWA CRUSHING Delta when you won't even be competing for the majority of the passengers.

The bigger CRUSHING possiblity comes from the passenger that chooses to go MCO-DAL-LAX vs MCO-ATL-LAX. But that has always been there and has nothing to do with SWA getting into ATL.

Later

I agree with much of what you said- Atlanta city limits are relatively small- but business wise its largerthan it's population- and you have to see how that interacts w/ swa's desire to attain more business travel. With so many fortune 500 companies based in ATL- we can't ignore it.
ATL does have only about 500,000 people- small- but it's ranked 8th as an economic center in the US. It's also ranked 8 in terms of GDP per capita. Now multiply that by all the US population that does business in ATL.

List of cities by GDP

This is a list of the richest cities and/or their metropolitan areas in the world by GDP according to PricewaterhouseCoopers[1] and other sources.

For cities in the OECD, data are based on city-level GDP per capita estimates on 2002 data from the OECD’s Competitive Cities report (2006), projected forward by PricewaterhouseCoopers to 2008. For non-OECD cities, data are not readily available from a single source. In some cases GDP per capita estimates at city level were available from national sources, but in many cases PricewaterhouseCoopers was only able to make approximate estimates based on plausible ratios of city-to-national GDP per capita.[1]

As such, the 2008 urban agglomeration GDP estimates should only be taken as broadly indicative of relative economic size of these cities in both OECD and non-OECD countries, as through PricewaterhouseCooper's methods only. Other surveys and methodologies, such as surveys from national governments, or other private companies were not taken into account when this list was compiled.

Show List of cities in the world by GDP

Show Top 5 per region

Show Top 10 cities in the European Union

Hide Top 10 cities in the United States

Rank City State GDP in $ID B Population M GDP per capita $ID K Area
1 New York City *****New York $ 1,466 19.25 $ 78.6 M
2 Los Angeles *****California $ 792 12.22 $ 64.8 M
3 Chicago *****Illinois $ 574 9.80 $ 58.6 M
4 Philadelphia *****Pennsylvania $ 388 5.36 $ 72.4 M
5 Washington, D.C. *****District of Columbia $ 375 4.25 $ 88.2 M
6 Boston *****Massachusetts $ 338 4.72 $ 71.6
7 Dallas *****Texas $ 304 4.47 $ 68.0
8 Atlanta *****Georgia (U.S. state) $ 301 3.36 $ 89.6 C
9 San Francisco *****California $ 297 4.39 $ 67.7 M
10 Houston *****Texas $ 292 4.47
 
Haven't really competed directly against them that much. Other than some SLC flying...very little direct overlap.

Some- really? I think Delta has seen this before. Just a refresher-

Morris Air was a low-fare airline based in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. It began operations in 1992. It was sold to Southwest Airlines in December 1993 for over $130 million.[1] The airline officially became part of Southwest in Summer 1994.

You really crushed Delta with that purchase, how many departures do you have from your previous staple job's hub? (35). Most of you SW A-holes seem to suffer from a severe case of arrogance and are a little delusional.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom