kevdog
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2002
- Posts
- 888
big_al said:maybe some people mistake being drunk for being extremely tired
The blowanator never seems to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
big_al said:maybe some people mistake being drunk for being extremely tired
More like a lot of Mormons don't know what a drunk looks like, just a lack of experience, but they've heard stories, and this guy fit the description. LOLkevdog said:Are you suggeting the fine folks in SLC discriminated against this pilot because he is not a mormon?
Once again, what makes you think the pilot was drunk?time builder said:More like a lot of Mormons don't know what a drunk looks like, just a lack of experience, but they've heard stories, and this guy fit the description. LOL
frog_flyer said:is an A/L-300 type rating a herk?
so hes a mil dude, eh?
Fugawe said:Third -- show TSA folks common respects due other humans. Do you abuse the order-taker at McDonald's?
Gobi Gred said:12 hour bottle to throttle rule for 121 operators is coming sooner rather than later I think.
A Squared said:Perhaps, but will it do any good? Pure speculation here, but I think it's likely that this guy was in violation of the laws that already exist. In the case of the America West pilots in Florida, it's pretty clear that they were in violation of the 8 hour rule. So how would making the rule stricter help?
It's sort of like lowering the legal BAC level for driving to 0.08%. (and before any of you get started, I am not advocating or excusing drunken driving) It just seems to be taken on faith that lowering it is a good thing, and will make our world safer. Me, I'm skeptical, and I am of the mind that we should have good reasons backed up by fact before we make any laws more restrictive. So my question is: How many accidents are caused by drivers with a 0.08% or 0.09% BAC? I know this isn't scientific, but I don't *ever* recall reading about a fatal accident where the driver had a 0.09% BAC. Seems to me like they are generally .185 or .231 or some number a long way from 0.08%
If the drivers that are causing the problems are .15% or more, then how does lowering it from .10% to .08% make things safer?
Getting back to the topic at hand, if the problem pilots are already drinking within the current 8 hour time limit, then how will extending the time limit solve the problem?
FN FAL said:Eliminate crime, raise the Federal BAC to .08. It seems kind of funny that you can drive your car to work on the instrumentalities of interstate commerce, pump import/export regulated fuel in your car and drive your NHTSA/EPA regulated car to work with a .079 BAC, but if you jump in a plane, you go to prison if you're more than .039999 BAC.