XPOO
You are now free to...
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Posts
- 1,874
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you ask me, SkyWest not being an ALPA carrier is what's draining ALPA's funds. All of those dues going to feed and entertain pilots they don't even represent. I can't see how collecting some $20 million a year from SkyWest pilots is going to push them further into the red.
It isn't. And trust me, the free ride is about to end for the SkyWest pilots, regardless of the vote outcome.
But no one did ask you. You are not a pilot, some things are over your head, thats why you are a simple minded dispatcher. Not trying to offend you, you know the saying, those who can fly, those who cant dispatch.If you ask me, SkyWest not being an ALPA carrier is what's draining ALPA's funds. All of those dues going to feed and entertain pilots they don't even represent. I can't see how collecting some $20 million a year from SkyWest pilots is going to push them further into the red.
ALPA will lose money representing SkyWest pilots. Etc. Etc.
Why do some of you keep saying that ALPA only wants Skywest for its dues money? Skywest will be a net DRAIN on the ALPA treasury during its entire membership to the Association if it is voted in, and ALPA leadership knows that. If all ALPA cared about was the ALPA treasury, every regional in ALPA would be booted, and they certainly wouldn't be trying to recruit yet another one.
There was an attempt at United to start a new Union, true. I think they just sent out their final communication a week or two, as the drive has failed. It was created by a small group of pilots who were unhappy with ALPA. We have 1000's of pilots at ALPA and obviously some guys are not going to be happy with their representation, just like at any other airline. It was their right to seek a change in representation, it couldn't convince our pilots that it could do a better job than ALPA, and now it's done as far as I know. If there is a group of pilots at any airline who have a better solution than ALPA (despite its warts), I'm all ears.
There are plenty of reasons why a Skywest pilot might want to vote no for ALPA representation on their property, and that's fine. I personally think the good reasons far outweigh the bad reasons, but that's for the Skywest pilots to decide. However, to say that ALPA just wants Skywest for its dues money is ridiculous for the reasons stated above.
Good luck with your vote. If your ALPA vote fails, I hope you guys find a Union that will work for you.
Don't you have some internet porn to attend to? Not being a pilot you probably won't understand this. There is always a vocal minority group of selfish, self serving clowns who want whatever they don't have at the moment. But then you might understand, being myopic and kinda dense, will allow you to subscribe to half truths and lies as if they are the truth. Nice that you spend your day "dispatching" trolling FI.So, care to explain United reasoning then? Or is it just beneficial to know why US Airways is doing so? I guess you're only a half the story kind of guy then.
I guess the line pilot who sits on the interview board has no say.The nice part about this drive is that in about 5 weeks all the talk about unions and skywest can finally stop one way or the other. It amazes me how much time people spend trying to convince others what is right for THEM and the industry, (and then threaten them with open ended questions about how it will effect a future position with other airlines).
I have an answer, it wont effect it at all. Remember who does the hiring at these jobs. Its not unionized line pilots thats for sure. Or maybe you will have to show your APLA card just to get into the interview.
Lessee,I don't care about ALPA one way or the other. But unions are businesses, plain and simple. They need money. When they see a pilot group as large as SkyWest all they see is dollar signs. SkyWest is also a business. I don't see how you can seperate the two. Both are out to make money. You say SkyWest wants to throw it's pilots under the bus to make a buck. Well who is to say ALPA wont do the same? They are BOTH businesses. ALPA uses your money to put ads in newspapers, makes keychains, lanyards, pamphlets, hot dogs, burgers and sodas for non-union members....and you don't see that a inappropriate use of company funds? Shouldn't the money you pay to the union go to things other than supplying food and accessories to non-union members?
No flame, honest question that is pertinent to this discussion:
As a PDT pilot, what is your "riff" with ALPA? Is it more with National, or AAA?
Again,I wasn't directing any of my comments directly at you, I was simply addressing the whole forum. But...those shareholders that SkyWest is looking out for also happens to be the very pilots you are talking about as well as every employee in the ESPP plan. Those margins translate over to our bonuses. Sure, if you want $20 more a month now and will forgo $300 per bonus check to do so, management will hop all over that. Why would they want to pay you $300 every three months when they can just pay you $60 in three monthly installments? Your logic is flawed. And my math is overexagerated to drive home a point, I in no way intend that number to be realistic so don't come back bashing the numbers.