Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Shuttle/Republic Relations

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
godsgift2aviatn said:
Nope........We'll let the arbitrator speak for us. Have a great day!

Dude, not many people on the Shuttle A-list (which you'll be know as at CHQ) will affect my seniority. I'm just curious how you justify taking training dates when it is against the RAH contract we have with management?

Have fun working here, A-lister. It will be hell if these actions continue.
 
So CHQ's scope covers all aircraft operated by RAH and Shuttle's scope covers all aircraft operated by Shuttle America. I can't seem to find the scope that talks about all pilots trained in indoc, can someone please point that out so I can understand how these guys are accepting illegal class dates?

Also, just out of curiosity, using the same logic we are illegally flying the Saab's...why are you ok with that?
 
godsgift2aviatn said:
Nope........We'll let the arbitrator speak for us. Have a great day!

Actually your council will speak for you and the arbitrator will be listening. Afterwards he makes the decision.
 
selected exerpts: in context; just to clarify

Axel said:
...There is a faction of junior guys at RAH who have been yelling "STAPLE!!!" since day one for all to hear, claiming that anything else will delay their upgrade... the guys screaming the loudest were instructing in Seminoles (figuratively speaking) this time last year...

... They are a minority, but they are making so much noise that noone sees anything else. Their public willingness to climb on the backs of others (MAA and SA) in order to advance is seriously annoying a lot of people both within their own group and beyond...
 
To: Shuttle America and Chautauqua crews

The public display of internal disputes needs to stop.

I ask that both parties refrain from making anymore statements regarding this matter. Let the facts, history, and convictions be heard at the proper jurisdication.

An exposure of internal disputes can only bring more harm and escalate an even more fragile relationship between the 2 pilot groups. The more you post the Wh's and How's here and raised your own personal speculation and delibration can only increase the animosity between us all.

There are many facts and informations that are being witheld by both MEC for reason like this and more. Let them deliberate this through proper channels and go from there.

Do not stoop so low to harm your fraternal brother's and sisters and put harm to your future family!
 
i'mbatman said:
No CHQ pilot wants to see an Saab guy furloughed. We are irritated at our managements attempts to circumvent an arbitrators ruling purely in attempts to see how far they can push us. Let me ask you this, if the Saabs were going away and Shuttle was not owned by RAH, what would happen to junior captains? They would go back to the right seat of the Saab. That IS NOT HAPPENING. The CHQ pilots are not blaming the Saab guys for what is happening. We Cx an upgrade class that members of the CHQ seniority list could have held and then found out that pilots that were not on our list are going to that class. All we want is for the arbitration to take place and then for the company to staff as necessary. If this actually happens, then hypothetically Delta can buy CHQ and just train all of us for the left seat in the 777. Its the same thing.


Every commuter pilots wet dream!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom