Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Rip nji

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
There are so many things that could have been done to save jobs for instance less crew meals or stay in less expensive hotels etc, etc.

Or maybe would could have started to charge a baggage fee!!

If you don't see as a positive sign for your future employment at NJA, then I don't know what to tell you. This is a good thing, even if you are furloughed.

I'm dying to know what the Bubba Club is going to do?? This is possibly the worst news ever for them.
 
Just curious, is NJ really going to have G650s? Does anyone have a handle on the number of excess a/c in the fleet today and have they been successful in selling off this excess? Until this matter is resolved, does it make sense to add to the fleet?

It seems that there are still more shares being redeemed versus those being sold so the excess has to be increasing and given that most new a/c orders have been cancelled, why would one think that they will be rushing out to buy the new Gulfstream?

The discussion about who may be flying which a/c may be relatively moot.
 
There are so many things that could have been done to save jobs for instance less crew meals or stay in less expensive hotels etc, etc. Even if these things would have only saved a small percentage of jobs wouldn't it have been worth it.
Not one job would be saved by anything like that....

Concessions DON'T save jobs.

Even CRJ will agree with me on that....


The only thing that will save jobs or start recalls is more flying and aircraft sales. The largest part of that depends on the economy (and Tax Cuts for the Rich)... When you see the DOW rising toward its former Highs ... then there will be recalls.

Lots of flying and aircraft sales created all these jobs to begin with. Not me sleeping in a flea bag motel with the springs digging into my back or eating bologna sandwiches.
 
Last edited:
Jack, many NJA families sacrificed a lot to make it a place you wanted to work. Actually no they didn't. They majority of the VMs were done by pilots under the gun. MANY pilots who were in the retirement age and COULD retire with military or other pensions did not take the very profitable early outs for the simple reason of "I could retire, but I want to go out and fly a jet few times a month" I had many pilots tell me this in person. They collectively gave again to try to keep you employed. The economy is the enemy--NOT your fellow pilots or NJASAP leaders. Yes the economy is along with the current NJASAP leaders. The current NJA leaders are the ones that at the last minute locked us off the Eboard and did not push the issues of the seniority resignation process. NJASAP also allowed EJM to grow and take up 90% of the sell offs during the peak travel days with out hiring any furloughs (rumored 3 were hired). Now DS wants some relief on the sell off clause in the contract and who do you think will take up the increased selloffs?

You need to seriously think about the realities of the over 800 NJA employees that have lost jobs in the last 6 months. You don't understand what the F*&K you are talking about. Unless you were out on the line in the months leading to the Furlough or have been out on the street looking for work then you seriously need to shut your talk hole!

Haz, to answer your question: 1) NJASAP is obligated to safeguard confidential NJ information that gets posted in the Crew Room. There would be no deterrent (like losing active employment) to prevent furloughed pilots from revealing that info to an unauthorized source, especially for those with a new employer who weren't intending to return to NJ. Other areas of the message board remain open to furloughed pilots and they have been given their own section of the board. 2) See the unwarranted insults and groundless accusations above. Some NJ pilots are concerned that they will be subjected to this type of behavior from bitter furloughees taking their stress and/or anger out on the very pilots who made NJA the flying career that attracted them in the first place. I did not want to believe that would happen, but this thread has been an eye-opener. If it can happen to such a staunch supporter of the NJ FOs, like myself, then it would very likely happen in the NJASAP Crew Room.
That is a weak excuse for what happened. They could have put in a "read only" option for the furloughs as originally discussed. Then at 2359 on 1/14/10 they locked us out so no one could bitch about the last minute "switch-arou" black out. There were more then a few pilots promoting VOL for extended days during the furlough because "they were here during the pre 05 bad times and earned the right to pad their wallets while helping the company out". They claimed this would help get us furloughs back faster. THIS IS TOTAL BS! The way you run your mouth it seems like your husband is one of these pilots. You have no idea what you're talking about so please STFU!
 
Last edited:
That is a weak excuse for what happened. They could have put in a "read only" option for the furloughs as originally discussed. Then at 2359 on 1/14/10 they locked us out so no one could bitch about the last minute "switch-arou" black out. There were more then a few pilots promoting VOL for extended days during the furlough because "they were here during the pre 05 bad times and earned the right to pad their wallets while helping the company out". They claimed this would help get us furloughs back faster. THIS IS TOTAL BS! The way you run your mouth it seems like your husband is one of these pilots. You have no idea what you're talking about so please STFU!

Leaving aside the pros and cons? of allowing access, the decision should have been taken by the pilots. I'm tired of the E board making unilateral decisions because "we know whats best for the pilots".
 
Leaving aside the pros and cons? of allowing access, the decision should have been taken by the pilots. I'm tired of the E board making unilateral decisions because "we know whats best for the pilots".

This is the main problem I have with the Eboad and the "05 Hero crowd" The Eboard doesn't listen to anyone. There is also a select group of pilots that feel that because they were at NJA pre 05 they know everything and have the right to do as they feel. Any attempt to discuss anything with them ends with the line "I was here before the 05 contract and you were not. There for you can't possibly know what you're talking about.

There has been a 2 class pilot group ever since the 05 contract because of Union's lack of unity.
 
The biggest cluster F during the furloughs is the resignation letter fiasco. The union kept saying the company won't do anything unethical and we accept that. WTF I guess american was one big unethical company when you could send in as many resignation letters as you wanted and they weren't going to do a damn thing because there was no way to verify the letter was sent by the furloughee. They just felt it was better to throw those letters away and if they turn down the recall then that's proof that they didn't want to come back.

But oh no the Union AND the company had to reinvent the wheel. Why? Out of sight out of mind is my guess. I think that is at least one bone we could have thrown the furloughees.
 
There are so many things that could have been done to save jobs for instance less crew meals or stay in less expensive hotels etc, etc. Even if these things would have only saved a small percentage of jobs wouldn't it have been worth it.

This is a lot like fuel savings. I could save fuel my whole life here at NJA but one ferry from london to teb and that is out the window and then some. Staying in cheaper hotels, and degrading the QOL for ALL is not the answer. The savings would have been negligible and it would have avoided any real accountability in certain departments that were blowing through money quicker than charlie sheen goes through hookers.
 
But oh no the Union AND the company had to reinvent the wheel. Why? Out of sight out of mind is my guess. I think that is at least one bone we could have thrown the furloughees.

Why? I agree with your out of sight out of mind theory. But it will also save the company money to get guys off the seniority list since our seniority continues to accrue while on furlough. You know they would love for all of us to resign so they could hire a bunch of guys on first year pay when recalls and hiring occurs, instead of bringing guys back on year 7-8 pay.

Why? Because the company is being run by a bunch of f'ing bean counters. Good luck with that business model when running a luxury service. The market share will continue to go elsewhere. Trying to convert to an LCC of the fractional market is not something to be proud of. Especially when your prices continue to rise and the product gets cheaper and cheaper. And the fleet gets older and older. It won't take the rich folks too long to see right through this.
 
Last edited:
There are so many things that could have been done to save jobs for instance less crew meals or stay in less expensive hotels etc, etc. Even if these things would have only saved a small percentage of jobs wouldn't it have been worth it. Instead it sounds like the I got mine attitude.

That's ridiculous. Nothing would have kept us on the property. I'd rather have all that stuff in tact when / if I go back.

Place the blame where it needs to be. Voluntary measures were agreed to by the company, "no furloughs" was announced, then reneged. Why that hasn't been thrown back in managements face I will never understand.
 
The biggest cluster F during the furloughs is the resignation letter fiasco. The union kept saying the company won't do anything unethical and we accept that. WTF I guess american was one big unethical company when you could send in as many resignation letters as you wanted and they weren't going to do a damn thing because there was no way to verify the letter was sent by the furloughee. They just felt it was better to throw those letters away and if they turn down the recall then that's proof that they didn't want to come back.

But oh no the Union AND the company had to reinvent the wheel. Why? Out of sight out of mind is my guess. I think that is at least one bone we could have thrown the furloughees.

I also agree about the "out of sight, out of mind" thing with an exception. I've gotten two calls from line pilots I've never met asking how things were, inviting us to go visit, etc. There are also FWG members working hard behind the scenes. Saying that we're totally out of sight / out of mind is a slap in the face to those guys.

On the resignation letter issue, the union must defend the CBA. We all know what the language is regarding recalls, problem is there isn't anything in there regarding resignations. Since the company as decided to take a hard line on the subject, the union can expend resources fighting this now, later or never. Fighting it now doesn't accomplish much since the players in the game will surely change. NJA has been going through management quicker than I can go through a 12 pack. You think EL and "Am I. Communicating" will be there when recalls start? I don't. Fighting it now shows the cards on a hand that won't be played for years. Never fighting it means the union will allow the company to do whatever it wants with the seniority list. Might as well throw all the names in the hat and start drawing. (BTW, according to an EBoard member at a CMH union meeting, the seniority list belongs to the union).

I've posted my thoughts on the NJASAP board on how to handle those resignation letters. I THINK I've got a handle on it. PM if you need it.
 
Place the blame where it needs to be. Voluntary measures were agreed to by the company, "no furloughs" was announced, then reneged. Why that hasn't been thrown back in managements face I will never understand.


Good point. Alot of decisions were almost made after last July. If I would have acted on any one of them I would have been completely screwed. Luckily RTS was canned before I met with the realtor etc....

VM's may have saved jobs for a few months. Furloughs still wouldn't have happened immediately, it still would have taken 60+ days due to the mass layoff provisions. In essence we were allowed to stay for a couple months longer. BUT alot of people made decisions based on the fact we thought we were atleast a bit more safe. I'm referring to early outs, LOA's etc... If I hadn't had smoke blown up my arse and had that weekly breakdown of "hey guys we're almost there" I may have just elected to take the 1000/mnth plus benefits.
 
... They get the the info from their friends who still work there. ... The liability comes from not taking precautions to protect sensitive information; it is recognized that there are some situations beyond their control. In the above scenario, the fault would lie with those individual pilots who ignored the posted TOS. (2) the real reason for not allowing them on the board shows a total lack of respect for the unemployed. Man up and take the criticism otherwise things don't change for the better. The concern is that there would be peer pressure to make concessions --change for the worse -- without the intended objective of hastening a recall, which only increased flying demand can do. It is a legitimate concern; there are numerous examples of that happening in aviation and we see it in this post. Are the union officials so sensitive they couldn't handle frustration and anger from the very people they are supposed to represent. ... They are sensitive to their legal obligation of providing Fair Representation to all of the pilotgroup. DFR means they cannot allow members of one demographic group to pressure those who exercise their contractual rights. There are so many things that could have been done to save jobs for instance less crew meals or stay in less expensive hotels etc, etc. Even if these things would have only saved a small percentage of jobs wouldn't it have been worth it. Instead it sounds like the I got mine attitude. That would only be your personal frustration causing interference. I can assure you the EBoard searched for all viable answers to prevent the furlough. The best solutions (which beat out examples like those suggested above) were presented to RTS and resulted in the VMs that had been working to some extent. They were discontinued by DS and it cannot be denied that the VMs were unable to increase flying demand which is the criteria that staffing is based on.

By the way your rant is very different then when you came on here several years ago crying about living below the poverty line. Try thinking back to those days and try it with no income. Maybe your perception will change but I doubt it. Insulting one of the NJ FOs most steadfast supporters just strengthens the argument of those who believe furloughed pilots would harass line pilots in the Crew Room...:erm:

A few very important points of order: I was standing up for all of the under-paid NJ pilots in 2004-5, not just my own family. I campaigned here during IBB on behalf of the FOs even though my husband was a PIC. The situation was vastly different both times. NJA could pay fair wages and the decision to do so was up to them. The Company cannot change the economy nor demand that owners begin flying more.

As to the question of my perception changing, I assure you it will not. My family will continue to have NJFF donations automatically taken from the NJA paycheck so that funds will be available to those in need and I will encourage other NJ families to do the same. Just as my husband dropped from the 18 day schedule to the 7&7 during the VM months, he will not seek extended days and we hope that his example will again be noted by other pilots. Just as I posted here to encourage NJ pilots to participate in the VMs to forestall a furlough, I will post asking them to refrain from practices (like extending) that could delay a recall. The FWG is organizing an Outreach Committee whose members will maintain personal contact with the furloughed pilots in their assigned geographical region; I will offer assistance to the pilot assigned to my area in the hope that we can lend moral support and practical help to the furloughees living near us. Best wishes to all furloughed frac pilots, NJW
 
Njw are you a robot? Are handed these speaking points? It's the same old rant. We get it if the union sold babies on the black market you would defend it as unifying families. Try sometime to see things from the eyes of the people who are worried about losing their house and then have to come on here and listen to some guys bitch about a gulfstream upgrade or being forced to eat a sandwich. It's really has become the same old story what many predicted would happen has. Just remember it is only by good fortune you weren't in the bottom 500 and your number could be called anytime. Be humble alot of people would appreciate it
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom