Recent FedEx meet/greet anyone?

[BonesF15]

I am bringing a bud in for the handshake session later this month.
I read somewhere that the applicants are getting interview type questions.
Any recent experience?

 

[Spur]

Great.

Now dudes are gonna need meet & greet prep...

 

[rk772]

Did mine 3 months ago. I was asked 3 interview type questions:
1) Why FedEx
2) Why hire you
3) tell me about your history

The rest of the time was general (get-to-know-you) conversation. It lasted about 30 minutes. It was a very relaxed atmosphere.

 

[AlbieF15]

Hallway gossip overheard included:

How do you feel about unions? What do you take to the union? To the company?

How will you balance your ANG/Reserve job with your airline career?

Why you?

Tell me about your leadership experience?

ANY skeletons?

All anecdotal--but it is a lot more formal than in the past.

 

[1st Overnite]

What's next, pre-meet-and-greet? Then meet and greet. Then interview. Then post interview. Then job offer. Then pre-class interview.

This whole process is stupid.

 

[boost]

Sorry but I have to disagree with you on this one. The current system, imperfect as it is, is one hundred times better than anything HR would come up with. At least the path to the interview is controlled by pilots and not some HR person. The more pilot controlled the interview process is the better off we all are!

 

[JDriver]

My M & G was mixed with some interview type questions and some lets get to know this guy to ensure he is not a moron questions.

My .02 is that I have no problem with them doing whatever they are doing. If you have basic communication skills and can keep your terets (sp?) syndrome symptoms under control you should have an enjoyable M&G.

 

[pilot141]

If you have basic communication skills and can keep your terets (sp?) syndrome symptoms under control you should have an enjoyable M&G.

It's Tourette's Syndrome. WHORE!!! Don't ask me (BIATCH!!!) how I know this. SLAPPY WHITE COONT!!!!

See, no problems at all. :laugh:

 

[Uppercrust]

Great.

Now dudes are gonna need meet & greet prep...

Does Albie do a meet and greet prep session???

 

[AlbieF15]

You don't need us for that...see above posts....

Some guys who are hot for the the seat have come to us first, but I don't think you need to delay a M&G for coaching. Just get in there and get in the cue...

 

[majortool]

I'm not familiar with the FedEx M&G - if you get a M&G, are you automatically interviewed? If someone has a better M&G than someone else, do they get an interview sooner?

 

[pilot141]

I'm not familiar with the FedEx M&G - if you get a M&G, are you automatically interviewed? If someone has a better M&G than someone else, do they get an interview sooner?

No and yes.

Think of it this way:

FedEx says that you must have a sponsor to walk you in and say "This is my #1 dude!" You sit down with an ACP and they go over your resume. The results of this can vary based on both you and your resume. If you are a good dude with good time then you'll get put in the "good pile" of apps and can expect an interview call. If you have some red flag (ie lots of training busts, a long break in flying, etc) you might get put in the "red pile" of apps - meaning no chance of an interview. There is also a "middle pile" for those folks who are riding the edge. The meet and greet thus acts as a second line of screening (the first being getting a sponsor at FedEx). Remember - the ACP's have no way of screening who comes in for the M&G. You could bring a guy with 100 hours of recip into a M&G, but he would get nowhere.

For those who go right into the "good pile" - no worries: an interview is coming right up. For those who have something come up and end up in the "other" piles - then it is time to get your FDX friends working for you and telling the ACP why you should get called. If not, you can languish for months and months before you get called for an interview.

Each ACP has his own piles, so the timing for interview calls can sometime make no sense at all.

 

[Echopapa]

Hallway gossip overheard included:

How do you feel about unions?

How will you balance your ANG/Reserve job with your airline career?
quote]

Wow...both of these questions seem to be to be improper...and could be interpreted as illegal.

If they are asking about union membership then they are setting a hiring criteria that would restrict hiring for those who are "anti" union. I don't think federal labor laws allow this type of union busting "pre-screening".

Along the same lines, it was my understanding that employers are not allowed to discriminate if you are a military reservist/guard.

If I went to a pre-screening with these questions, and was not hired, I would definely call the cochran firm.....

Has anyone actually had these questions? If so please let us know so we can go to the Union and have this behavior stopped.

 

[Ready2Fly]

Hallway gossip overheard included:

How do you feel about unions?

How will you balance your ANG/Reserve job with your airline career?
quote]

Wow...both of these questions seem to be to be improper...and could be interpreted as illegal.

If they are asking about union membership then they are setting a hiring criteria that would restrict hiring for those who are "anti" union. I don't think federal labor laws allow this type of union busting "pre-screening".

Along the same lines, it was my understanding that employers are not allowed to discriminate if you are a military reservist/guard.

If I went to a pre-screening with these questions, and was not hired, I would definely call the cochran firm.....

Has anyone actually had these questions? If so please let us know so we can go to the Union and have this behavior stopped.

First it was PFT, now it's SFT.... Sue for Training!

 

[T-Ball]

paranoid anyone?

Wow...both of these questions seem to be to be improper...and could be interpreted as illegal.

If they are asking about union membership then they are setting a hiring criteria that would restrict hiring for those who are "anti" union. I don't think federal labor laws allow this type of union busting "pre-screening".

Along the same lines, it was my understanding that employers are not allowed to discriminate if you are a military reservist/guard.

If I went to a pre-screening with these questions, and was not hired, I would definely call the cochran firm.....

Has anyone actually had these questions? If so please let us know so we can go to the Union and have this behavior stopped.

I had both these questions and was hired. I even had on my resume that I was an active union volunteer.

The question is not about union busting it's about finding out how you interact with people when being asked a critical question.

If you lie and tell them what (you think) they want to hear they will most likely send you packing. If you're honest and have a valid reason for your position on the answer given you will make it to the next round.

 

[PurpleTail]

What's next, pre-meet-and-greet? Then meet and greet. Then interview. Then post interview. Then job offer. Then pre-class interview.

This whole process is stupid.

I didn't get a first hand experience of 'the fun' myself but ask someone that went threw a United interview years back during their hiring boom. They were hiring maybe 1 out of every 4 interviewed and most candidates left the interview ready to go postal on someone. I've heard some crazy stories.

Now, compare that with the FedEx process and you'll be pleasantly surprised. Yes, the process can be frustrating but is dignified and respectable. You will leave the interview feeling you did the best you could do and feel like you will get a fair shot at getting hired. Not everyone does but at least you don't get raked across the coals during the process.

 

[AlbieF15]

I'm not saying these questions are legal, smart, or appropriate. I'm regurgitating what I've heard.

As a Guardsman, when I hear an airline interivew has asked "how do you plan to integrate your reserve duties with your job..." I want them to say "any way I damn well please--its the law..." However, looking at your interviewer and saying "that's a BS illegal question..." is a sure ticket to fail "another" portion of the interview. So--I often cover techniques for such questions, regardless of whether or not they are "legal".

However, EchoPapa...I'm with you 100%. For what its worth, many of these are attritbuted to a particular ACP. You can likely figure out who, but lets keep only our clean sheets our here in public eye. If you have "issues" with anyone in particular your block rep will know who it is and the best way to approach the problem.

 

[Resume Writer]

FedEx is not the only one asking these questions - I have had candidates at UPS asked these questions also. While the question about your Guard/Reserve duty is definitely illegal, you cannot question them in the interview, nor can you really do a lot about it. It is a he said / she said type of situation - prove they asked it.

FWIW, I believe I know why they are asking the reserve question. This is what I have been told, by pilots who do this and other individuals in the hiring process (do not shoot the messenger - just passing on the message).

Like it or not, the aviation industry runs on a schedule and needs their employees to work, so as not to cause stress to the operation. Some pilots who have been hired at both of these carriers, and other airlines as well, have had crappy airline reserve schedules, and had their units take them out on special projects so they do not have to work those schedules. Unfortunately, a few bad apples have ruined it for everyone else, so there is heavy scrutinizing in this area.

Do not be surprised in a UPS interview if they take some issue at your current airline and ask you about it. It has happened to every pilot I have prepped for them. The same thing is happening at FedEx.

As to the issue about having Meet and Greet Prep, I would say be as prepared as possible - whether you practice with a spouse or pay someone to prep you. These are the same type of questions asked by SWA and everyone else, they are just in a different order.

While the FedEx process may seem cumbersome, I think you are getting a better shot at having someone actually get to know you in the interview process. Do not be caught unaware - they are still evaluating you. The main job of anyone interviewing, whether it is another pilot or HR, is to eliminate people. I know that sounds harsh, but if you consider the number of candidates applying for these positions, the sheer numbers become difficult to manage.

The best way to get into the "yes" pile is to be prepared. Be able to articulate why you want to work for them and align your values / personality with their operation.

Good luck to all the Meet and Greet Candidates!

 

[VaB]

You can likely figure out who, but lets keep only our clean sheets our here in public eye.

I don't know, Albie. A little public humiliation goes a long way in cleaning stuff like that up. It works pretty good in ANC and SFS. That's what I hear anyway.

I'm not suggesting that you name names, especially since folks know who you are. Sometimes it's warranted though.

 

[Scarabus]

So where can you find info on the type of questions and answers HR people are looking for.

 

[Resume Writer]

So where can you find info on the type of questions and answers HR people are looking for.

You can do an internet search on "behavioral interviews." There are also books available at your local bookstore that cover these topics. However, these sources are going to be very general in nature.

I just attended a Resume Writer and Career Coach conference in SFO. One of the topics was on interviewing techniques from a coach perspective. While I thought some of the information was valuable, it did not really address all the "corners" that job seekers could get backed into - which I think that every career/interview coach should understand. The woman conducting the presentation has written a good "general knowledge" book for jobseekers, called "Boost Your Interview IQ." You can probably pick it up on Amazon.com

 

[Echopapa]

If its illegal then it should stop. We do need to talk about it so that we can approach our union legal department and at a minimum send a cease and desist letter. That way the word will get out to "rouge" managers.

How do you prove it?

Easy...have a few pilots who interviewed and are already on property file a grievence. Since they already interviewed and are already on board (preferably over one year..off probation) there is nothing to lose. In fact you gain some protection by filing a grivence since the company will go out of its way to ensure you are not fired so that it won't look like retaliation.

Testimony is evidence. If you have more than one person testify to the same or similar occurance then it leds more credibility. There is absolutely no need for tape recordings. Rape allegations are tried and convicted everyday based only on the testimony of one victim.

My point is this...if they are asking the question during an interview then its important. They wouldn't ask it if it wasn't a basis for their decision.

The reason I asked if this was really happening was becuase I wasn't asked anything like this during my interview.

I certainly don't recommend that anyone confront the interviewer during the interview....but....after you are hired and and property, or if you are not hired, then approach the subject.

Sorry for the long post...if you have encountered this question I ask that you contact the Union legal department. This is exactly why we pay dues.

 

[Rez O. Lewshun]

If its illegal then it should stop. We do need to talk about it so that we can approach our union legal department and at a minimum send a cease and desist letter. That way the word will get out to "rouge" managers.

How do you prove it?

Easy...have a few pilots who interviewed and are already on property file a grievence. Since they already interviewed and are already on board (preferably over one year..off probation) there is nothing to lose. In fact you gain some protection by filing a grivence since the company will go out of its way to ensure you are not fired so that it won't look like retaliation.

Testimony is evidence. If you have more than one person testify to the same or similar occurance then it leds more credibility. There is absolutely no need for tape recordings. Rape allegations are tried and convicted everyday based only on the testimony of one victim.

My point is this...if they are asking the question during an interview then its important. They wouldn't ask it if it wasn't a basis for their decision.

The reason I asked if this was really happening was becuase I wasn't asked anything like this during my interview.

I certainly don't recommend that anyone confront the interviewer during the interview....but....after you are hired and and property, or if you are not hired, then approach the subject.

Sorry for the long post...if you have encountered this question I ask that you contact the Union legal department. This is exactly why we pay dues.

ugh....... no.

Where in the contract is there language concerning agreements on interview requirements. Only with a CBA section to reference can you begin to file a grievance...

Unions and Air Line Pilots don't run airlines! Including the hiring!

Seems to me, interviews are like life... sometimes it isn't fair. The trick is... can you deal with it and come out clean (or hired ) on the otherside....

Good luck!

 

[AlbieF15]

EP...contact your mil affairs chairman. This has been noted and done. Details from them...but not here in this forum.

You can look me up in VIPS and call if you'd like--I'll vector you to the mil affairs rep--or just go to the ALPA board and look the guy up.

 

[Quiet Flight]

ACLU would love this thread. I'd just sack up and deal.

Interview stuck to the pre-printed script. I was asked the following in my M&G:

"Why you instead of the 11k others?"

"How'd you get to this point?/Tell me about yourself."

"How do you know (sponsor)?"

"You a football fan?"

In/out 40 mins. Easy day.

 

[1st Overnite]

I didn't get a first hand experience of 'the fun' myself but ask someone that went threw a United interview years back during their hiring boom. They were hiring maybe 1 out of every 4 interviewed and most candidates left the interview ready to go postal on someone. I've heard some crazy stories.

Now, compare that with the FedEx process and you'll be pleasantly surprised. Yes, the process can be frustrating but is dignified and respectable. You will leave the interview feeling you did the best you could do and feel like you will get a fair shot at getting hired. Not everyone does but at least you don't get raked across the coals during the process.

I agree it is probably better than United in their heyday, but I have been trying to schedule a meet-and-greet for 6 months. This last time, I called from 745am MEM time until 1100am. Left the message about 815am and got no response. I felt as if I was calling in for a radio prize and kept getting the busy signal. I'm just frusterated that I have done everything, except go to MEM and wait in line with the other 35 pilots on opening day of scheduling season, to schedule a meet and greet.

 

[Resume Writer]

If its illegal then it should stop. We do need to talk about it so that we can approach our union legal department and at a minimum send a cease and desist letter. That way the word will get out to "rouge" managers.

How do you prove it?

Easy...have a few pilots who interviewed and are already on property file a grievence. Since they already interviewed and are already on board (preferably over one year..off probation) there is nothing to lose. In fact you gain some protection by filing a grivence since the company will go out of its way to ensure you are not fired so that it won't look like retaliation.

Testimony is evidence. If you have more than one person testify to the same or similar occurance then it leds more credibility. There is absolutely no need for tape recordings. Rape allegations are tried and convicted everyday based only on the testimony of one victim.

My point is this...if they are asking the question during an interview then its important. They wouldn't ask it if it wasn't a basis for their decision.

The reason I asked if this was really happening was becuase I wasn't asked anything like this during my interview.

I certainly don't recommend that anyone confront the interviewer during the interview....but....after you are hired and and property, or if you are not hired, then approach the subject.

Sorry for the long post...if you have encountered this question I ask that you contact the Union legal department. This is exactly why we pay dues.

I am not sure that I would suggest that anyone try to sue over this or make a huge deal with union reps about it. This is a very small industry and that person (or people, if several decide to make an issue) would have their names all over the place.

As for believing that the union will protect your job - think again. If you become enough of a thorn in management's side, they will find a way to make your life miserable or fire you. We had a Captain at my old airline become very vocal about certain issues. They found a way to fire him. It took three years to get his job back without back pay. We were an ALPA carrier as well.

Understand that management will take a gamble in firing you. It is like a roll of the dice to them, and they will take pleasure in making an example out of you to keep the troops in line. I have seen it happen so many times at different airlines.

We had a guy who was organizing the union for the ramp agents. They did not go after him, but went after his wife who was a flight attendant. They said she failed a drug test. The FAs were union. It took another three years to get her job back, however she did get back pay, which is very rare because an arbitrator does not expect you to do nothing to mitigate your circumstances while you are not at the airline.

We had two FAs fired for supposedly stealing headset money. They decided not to fight it. Another FA I know has been waiting three years to get his job back because the company said he was one minute late to board the airplane. All unionized employees - so do not think they won't fire you.

I am just providing these examples of real life situations - all of which happened to union employees. Do I think it is right? Not a chance. But I would sure proceed with caution.

 

[Echopapa]

Where in the contract is there language concerning agreements on interview requirements. Only with a CBA section to reference can you begin to file a grievance..

I don't agree about having to be a contractual issue to have the Union involved.

There is nothing in our contract that prevents the company from killing crew members that block out late....but they still can't do it...its illegal.

If it is in fact against federal labor laws (and I"m not sure it is) to pre-screen against union membership then it should be addressed by the organization that has most to loose by that illegal behavior..our union.

As far as being fired...I see things completely different. Not all companies are the same...but what I have seen here is that if you file a complaint you actually are more protected from arbitrary firing...in this case you have a case to make for retaliation and the company knows that.

 

[Rez O. Lewshun]

As for believing that the union will protect your job - think again. If you become enough of a thorn in management's side, they will find a way to make your life miserable or fire you. We had a Captain at my old airline become very vocal about certain issues. They found a way to fire him. It took three years to get his job back without back pay. We were an ALPA carrier as well.

So did the union protect his job or not? I am confused. Oh, you want instanteous gratifiaction in the legal system...... Maybe a drive thru court system. Order a #3 combo legal special....suprsize!

Maybe you shouldn't a thorn is managements side. Don't take that the wrong way... It is all political. And one has to learn to choose his battles and realize what he can win and can't, even if he is right....

This is all about the life isn't fair...something mama should of taught along time ago.

 

[Rez O. Lewshun]

I don't agree about having to be a contractual issue to have the Union involved. .

You don't have to agree. However, the way the grievance process works is, a pilot must cite a contractual section that was violated. This is elementry and fundamental.

There is nothing in our contract that prevents the company from killing crew members that block out late....but they still can't do it...its illegal..

Right, but state and/or FED law would be involved. Unions lawyers aren't criminal lawyers or DAs

If it is in fact against federal labor laws (and I"m not sure it is) to pre-screen against union membership then it should be addressed by the organization that has most to loose by that illegal behavior..our union..

Again, unions don't represent potential members. They only represent active members. If applicants can gain the resource of the union simply by interviewing, the union wouldn't be a union. It would be the ACLU, which many would argue is the same anyway....

What you really need is labor lawyer. Becuase this type of issue really isn't union specific, although the question in question is.... There are many illegal questions that can't be asked and yet still are.... Should the union represent applicants for gender questions? Or is that for the NOW? What about guard/reserve questions? Should the DOD handle that? What about politcal questions? Are you a memeber of the DNC cause we are all GWB men here. A DNC lawyer or should the union represent....

As far as being fired...I see things completely different. Not all companies are the same...but what I have seen here is that if you file a complaint you actually are more protected from arbitrary firing...in this case you have a case to make for retaliation and the company knows that.

I guess where we disagree is with whom to file the complaint....

I say F. Lee Bailey....