lookin4better
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2005
- Posts
- 6,970
Thats just their point..... UAL/DAL are and will be " subsidising " Bedfords little dream of an airline and I am sure they dont like it.
Regardless of the certificate shuffle being performed..... they ( the airlines using RAH as feed ) can use any just cause they want to cancel the contracts.... and " subsidising " Rev Bedfords new airline ( competition for them ) seems like legal enough reason to cancel any current contrats. Just because he hides it under one certificate and funds it with someone elses money doesnt mean UAL and DAL cant cancel with cause.
If they have to pay a small penalty to starve their new competition..... Im sure its a small price to pay..... Bedford isnt the only one with " business smarts "
Regardless of the certificate shuffle being performed..... they ( the airlines using RAH as feed ) can use any just cause they want to cancel the contracts.... and " subsidising " Rev Bedfords new airline ( competition for them ) seems like legal enough reason to cancel any current contrats. Just because he hides it under one certificate and funds it with someone elses money doesnt mean UAL and DAL cant cancel with cause.
If they have to pay a small penalty to starve their new competition..... Im sure its a small price to pay..... Bedford isnt the only one with " business smarts "