Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Plane forced to abort landing in high winds

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Kwick, I hope that you're just being a troll. Because if you're serious, you shouldn't be flying an airplane for a living. Just saying.
 
Kwick, I hope that you're just being a troll. Because if you're serious, you shouldn't be flying an airplane for a living. Just saying.


So you don't believe in using the
rudder in a crosswind landing
either?

How did you ever get a license?

Did you just buy one ?
 
So you don't believe in using the
rudder in a crosswind landing
either?

How did you ever get a license?

Did you just buy one ?

Is that what he said?

No one is impressed with the assumptions you've made on this thread-
 
The real story is that they received a wind shear warning at 50 ft and performed a wind shear escape maneuver. A Lufthansa 737 then landed and was asked if they received any wind shear. I kid you not, the krauts said they received multiple reactive wind shear warnings and continued to land...the radio was silent and Emirates diverted.
 
The real story is that they received a wind shear warning at 50 ft and performed a wind shear escape maneuver. A Lufthansa 737 then landed and was asked if they received any wind shear. I kid you not, the krauts said they received multiple reactive wind shear warnings and continued to land...the radio was silent and Emirates diverted.

Someone real creative could probably do a great "Hitler debriefs a crew for landing during a windshear alert" spoof using the clip we all have seen.....That makes total sense and what the more insightful posters surmised on here. It appeared as nothing more than a textbook perfect approach and miss....yet there were still some that thought they needed to criticize, amazing. They probably spend their days off watching cable news thinking they are learning something and have very big watches and very little......
 
and Kwick, you're an idiot dude. In any large jet you simply hold a crab in till you are ready to flare then you straighten out the nose with the rudder and a little opposite aileron. If you think he wasn't using rudder properly from that video you must think the "cross control" method of landing wasn't being used. Well guess what, that works in a Cessna 150, airline pilots don't do that.
 
and Kwick, you're an idiot dude. In any large jet you simply hold a crab in till you are ready to flare then you straighten out the nose with the rudder and a little opposite aileron. If you think he wasn't using rudder properly from that video you must think the "cross control" method of landing wasn't being used. Well guess what, that works in a Cessna 150, airline pilots don't do that.


It sounds like you have the right idea,
you just have to execute.

If it's within limits, you use the the rudder
and make the landing.

That's the difference between a Pro and
a "Wanna-be"
 
It sounds like you have the right idea,
you just have to execute.

If it's within limits, you use the the rudder
and make the landing.

That's the difference between a Pro and
a "Wanna-be"

So how did you see from that video that it was in limits and he was wrong to go around? I don't know about you, but for me it's a seat of the pants decision made looking out the window. I'll I saw was he saw something that warranted a go around and did a textbook one. Untill then it looked like a spot on approach.
 
A wind shear warning would warrant
the consideration of a go- around.

But you can't successfully argue against something as
clear cut as the use of the rudder,
when the manual excerpt is provided,
and successful Boeing landing videos
are posted.

You're just making excuses for
the mediocrity that seems to be
overtaking this industry.

And if you can't argue against the facts,
then try do discredit the person that holds
a different view than your own.
 
Why would you use rudder when you are performing a windshear escape maneuver. As sugar explained earlier they received a windshear warning, not a caution, a warning mandating a G/A with no config changes until clear. Applying rudder would just degrade performance at a time when max is called for.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top