Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pinnacle, Mesaba, Colgan SLI

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You forget PDT/ALG a few years ago, and I think more recently, CHQ & Shuttle America.

No sheet Shirlock, I'm not talking about simple 2-airline mergers! Arbitrator Bloch just did the recent Delta and Northwest SLI. There are plenty of examples of just 2-airline mergers. Those are far easier than taking 3 (or more airlines) and merging them into one list. Arbitrator Bloch will have very few examples, Eagle being one of them.
 
DOH will not be accepted at Colgan or Pinnacle. Mesaba won't like straight relative. Its going to have to be some sort of combo. How DOH is weighted toward Relative is the big question.

LOL! I love how people can speak like they can think what the arbitrator will rule or that they can somehow rule a binding arbitration decision. Face it, DOH *can* happen and if it's decided in binding arbitration, you will live with it.


I say again, we expect to be fairly integrated. I dont think that is unreasonable.
I don't think Colgan deserves anything but DOH. Your carrier, of all 3, has the fastest movement, and there are no 'by choice' FOs of 3-4+ years. Mesaba and Pinnacle are filled with those. On the CA side, Colgan is super junior because of fast movement, while Mesaba and Pinnacle are not (at least, not anymore).

But who am I to say? I highly, highly doubt the 3 pilot groups will agree on a method with 100% mutual agreement. This will go to the arbitrator, and a binding arbitration decision will be made.
 
My bet is on an arbitrator. If I show up junior to a guy with half my longevity things will get ugly.

And very much a possibility if relative integration is decided. A 2 year Colgan FO will have 'relative seniority' to you as a 4 or 4.5 year FO at Pinnacle. And in fact, he may even end up being more senior than you. I honestly can't see any "split"... like a partial DOH and a partial relative integration. And people need to stop comaring us to US Air/Am West. Entirely different situation there altogether. We are regionals, and as much as I hate to say it, we are very similar (as opposed to Am West/US Air). If I was a bettin man in Vegas, my guess of an arbitrated decision would be DOH.
 
What you fail to consider is that Mesaba's FOs have much less longevity than Pinnacle's as well. Your small footprint is not as small as you think.

And what's not fair about date of hire? Time served is the one thing we all have in common.

Not really, and you are forgetting that thanks to the end of the old NWA Saab flying the DOH for captains here is quickly heading north of the pre bankruptcy days of 2005.
 
Having a 2 year pilot from Colgan placed in front of a 3-4-5-6-7... year pilot at pinnacle or Mesaba in not "fair". If you were hired 2 years ago, you go behind someone hired 3 years ago. That is "fair".

I should think that with how Colgan has gotten so many improvements with this contract that they should not be looking to have a 1 year guy bump a 7 year guy at 9E or XJ. I mean come on, lets be real. When I look at this TA and I see my healtcare only getting a little better, vacation getting a little better, and ready reserve rules being thrown out the window I should think maybe xj should get something on SLI. I am just saying........ You (colgan) get great new work rules, huge pay raises and now you want my seniority? We all know DOH is not likely to happen as is straight relative is not fair either. Some mix of all will most likely prevail. But that is not for us to decide, that is for our 9 negotiators to agree upon. I do not envy their next few months. in the end we might all think we got screwed and that is how the arbitraitor might rule is "fair". Oh and to you colgan guys and gals, I should think that your most senior people have nothing to worry about, none but a couple of our top 200 live out east and want to go to the Q400. who knows, maybe some fences is not a bad idea to protect some of your current positions and bidding seniority and CA slots. in the end it is not us, but our designated guys who will figure this all out. cross your fingers
 
How about DOH 9L and XJ then with that list relative to 9E?
 
We'll know when we know...until then, this is all a game of "pin the pen*s on the guy that desperately needs it"...but I'm guessing DOH...
 

Latest resources

Back
Top