Nah, I'm not anywhere near perfect. I imagine that I fall somewhere around average. I do the work, study, keep my Jepps up to date, and try to not get violated. In my seat, I'm moderately senior. When there are 3 days, I can hold them in the middle of the week. Even if I were at the top of the list, I would think that there needs to be something other than pure seniority.
I hear your arguments, and they are well received. It would be difficult to get a system together with protections against abuse, but that is why we have a union right? Is the union nothing more than a seniority list? That's the way it sounds, since we would lose everything we've fought for if seniority went out the window. It just seems that seniority is an antiquated system, and it needs to be updated. Maybe seniority plus merit of some kind. A blend?
This might be interesting, but clearly wouldn't be accepted by the pilot group. Since FOQA (FDR downloads) is on the way, we could use that as a reliable measure of proficiency? Right now it is de-identified, but what if it weren't? What if you are judged based on how many infractions your flights record over the course of a year? (Flap overspeeds, speed below 10,000 feet, G-loads, hard landings, etc.) It could see who was PF based on the XFR switch, plus averaged over a year, you would see patterns, I'm sure.
Our union has some smart people in there, right? Why can't they come up with a good system to augment seniority? Of course the senior people want to keep seniority. It's like tenure, once you get there, you don't have to do anything to stay there. Just keep breathing, and keep studying a little 2 days prior to a checkride. No one cares how you fly in the 5-6 months no one is watching!
I know I'm banging my head against the wall. It would just be nice if you people would think outside the box sometimes.
As in law, most of the time generally accepted practices evolve into traditions and customs for good reason. This is usually because, through trial and error, "distilled methods" become "best practices!" I did not invent the wheel, but after thousands of years, it is still used today. I have read the early history of our Profession, and I fully understand why the "Seniority System" was adopted, and why much of early Union work in ALPA, was committed to establishing this system, and it was paid for with alot of negotiating capital. There were alot of really smart people that started this Union in the 1930's, and I think they cracked the code on something tried and true, even back then! ALPA's goals are to promote Safety, and to protect Pilot's Wages and Benefits. Over the years, they have done a pretty good job of that considering the stacked deck in Politics and Pro-Management administrations in the Executive Branch. The "Seniority System" has been the foundation of our Union. It was fought for, early on, against some pretty ruthless managements that saw the system as a threat to MGMT's ability to contain low costs. Really, some of those variables have not changed. ALPA gains, along with the general Union movement, has improved Safety, wages, and working conditions, not only for it's membership, but raised the bar for Non-Union workers in country for years.
I can think outside the box. But, I also have another philosophy, "If it's not Broke, Don't Fix it!" Also, there are usually reasons for why things are the way they are! Study the History! I can be open minded to new thought, but new thought will always be met with great skepticism. Your proposed system, is based on merit? Does Merit mean if you hang out in the CPO, that you get special favor? Some of what you propose cannot be adequately defined, and to be honest, IMHO, would provide an environment that pilots could be constantly abused and never be able to prove it. Granted, there may be no perfect system, but, the Seniority System is superior to what you have not adequately defined that would be open to wide interpretation and possibly promote the Good-Old-Boy network. Read "Flying the Line!" You should have received a copy in your new hire class when you got hired. It may enlighten you a bit, and possibly you will see that not much has changed in some ways since 1931.
There is value in downloading FDR's to track negative trends. However, I doubt what you are suggesting of grading a pilot would ever be allowed. This could easily get out of hand also. There are too many opportunities to single out MGMT undesirables, and apply disparate treatment.
If you strive to be a Professional, you understand that our job is a constant learning environment for our entire career. I am relatively Senior, and I would never show up for a check ride or loft, without proper preparation. This really means constant study and flying standard, so that I may not have to cram a week or two before a check-ride. It has always worked well for me, as it gives me the confidence I need to tackle the other things that may happen that I have little control over. I don't need special recognition in any way for doing my job and being a Professional! I always expect a positive outcome because I do my part!
You seem to claim to think outside the box on this issue. Yet, in your 4th paragraph, you want someone else to figure it out for you! Why don't you come up with the plan instead of sitting back and wanting someone else to do it for you. I respect people who can think outside the box--but, more importantly only those who can develop solutions instead of making general statements that sound like whinning, and someone implying that " the rules are not fair!"
Take some good advice, at your next job, get your appication in earlier! Seniority is everything in this industry, and that will never change!