Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pet peeves from the ATC folks

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catbert
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 49

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Hold West said:
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Hold, Why does the "turn the slow aircraft" rule only apply when the slow aircraft is non-airline?? When the overtaking aircraft is corporate, ATC turns or delays the corp aircraft instead if the "slow" airliner. Why the double standard?

See example on pg 5 of this thread.
 
Hold West said:
What are you filing as your aircraft type? The Eclipse is a DV20, if you are filing DA20, that's wrong. I might even bite on that one for a sec, confusing it with the Falcon 20 (FA20).

If it's a radio thing, what are you giving as your aircraft type? Diamond? Diamond Eclipse? DA20-C1 (shudder)? Curious about this. I would call it a Diamond Eclipse (Make/model) I think, but just Eclipse should get the idea across.

I've filed DA20. Definately use DV20 from now on. For the call sign, we just use Diamond. I think using Eclipse would cause more confusion, being too specific since a lot of people still refer to them as Katanas, which is close enough for me.
 
Hold West said:
Please don't sit up there in cruise flight playing with your WhizKid nav system until you find some obscure fix that I've never heard of, then ask to go direct there.
How about when the fix is in your own airspace? Many times we file to a fix, then we are read off a full route with radial/dist to radial/distance. No big deal there, but one day I decided to plot that mysterious PBD/PBD compared to the filed intersection. The intersection of the two radials was within 1 degree of heading and less than 1/2 mile from the filed fix. Here's your sign.......

Other times ARTCC says descend to cross 130nm south of XYZ at FLxxx, when there is a perfectly good intersection close to the requested PBD.
 
HS125 said:
So that must have been you that I was talking to...

Not unless you're one of those really old and crusty captains :) -- I left FNT in '78 for a twenty year stint at ORD. Procedures may very well be the same now, though, I think there's still a NWS on the field at FNT.
 
Well, I'm late to this party, but just chock full of observations. First, I can identify with everything Hold West has said!

Pilots who don't listen. Listening is more than just reading back the clearance, it's the guys who change freqs and start transmitting without ever listening to what's going on the frequency. As HW said, if I issue a clearance, I need a read back of same. That 2 second pause between the time I unkey and the recipient answers is NOT a good opportunity for you to ask for direct to ZFDAT or whaerever that dang fix is. Or, just as soon as I tell two guys to stand-by while I coordinate, not 3 seconds will go by before more folks start transmitting. Hello! Good pilots can tell a lot about what's happening by listening to what the controller is telling the other guys, if they just listen up a bit. Yes, I know there's facilities and freqs so busy you have to butt in to be heard, but way too many guys are blocking readbacks when all they had to do was listen for 10 seconds first.

Descents; I know you guys are under constand pressure to save fuel, but there's a reason why I said "Descend and maintain XX", and it often has to do with separation. I almost never say "Pilot's discretion" anymore, because I don't have time for any. Yet I often still get pilots reading back "Roger, discretion to six." You just went from #4 to #6 in line fella. And even when you do read it back correctly, I can't make you #2 because if I tried, you'd be 1500' above glideslope at the LOM. That's right fellas, some of you are getting a 20 mile final instead of 10 because you won't get that hot-rod jet down and slowed in a timely manner, so I'm not screwing up the finals by trying to shoehorn you into a 7 mile gap at 240 kts and a grand high. You're going to the end of the line. There are some Mitzi drivers I know who are good enough, I don't know you.

"With you". I hate it, didn't use to bother me much, now I get Students and Private pilots calling me out of the blue "With you". That's nice, did you want something? A transponder code? Flight following? Anything in particular?


On the flip side,

Runway changes and slam dunks. I try to be conservative here, because of stuff I hear on boards like this, but I work with controllers who use them gleefully; because nobody complains, and some guys will ask for them to get to the airport 30 sec faster. That's right, it doesn't do a damn bit of good for me to tell my peers and trainees "Try not to switch runways on them inside 15 miles" and then have three pilots the next day offer to switch runways at 6 miles to beat the King Air to the ramp. Same for the slam dunks. I just saw an Emb 170 the other night do a dam fine impression of a B727 that I didn't even think was possible in the newer jets. I didn't instigate it, they did it on their own. A non-pilot controller sees that, and some will assume every airliner can do the same.

It used to really annoy me that some pilot's obviously never even looked at a chart or DP when they filed, but then I learned that a lot of you aren't filing yourselves anymore. Still, it's mildly annoying to see a C-750 filed for FL410 on a DP which is clearly marked for aircraft AOB 11,000'...:erm: Stand by while I fix this....

Enough for now, more later.
 
Last edited:
B757s, 767s, and A300s especially flying freight. I know you guys are often light on the way in, but I swear, I've got Caravans and Centurions doing S-turns to try to follow you from 10 miles in. Can't you at least do 160 kts to the freakin marker? I'm getting groundspeeds in the 100-110 kt catagory from you guys on final, right up there with the C-172SPs. :uzi:

"I think we have it in sight."
"I think you're cleared for the visual approach."



Seriously, this has been all in good fun, but there's not near enough communications anymore between pilots and controllers. Between no more FAM flights, and restrictions (now mostly gone) on Tower/Tracon visits, we never talk to each other except on the radio. There really needs to be more give-n-take. So I'm suggesting this:

Buy a controller a beer night. :D :D :D
 
Last edited:
heres o few Q's that i have

when told to stand by when do some people read it back?

Ident - why do some read it back? i thought the highlight on the scope was good enough.

when at an airport that only has one taxiway leading to the full length how does callling ready in sequence gonna help the controller? all that hes gonna say back is #xxx hold short. i think that is unnessisary congestion and i dont call untill im #1. and callin ready for departure when you can see someone on short final?

then again im not a controller but is my plan B, thinking i should have made it plan A
 
Hold West said:
Yep, bigger'n sh*t, there's Maverick VOR/DME. Well...

My suggestion is you throw exactly what you just told me on a NASA ASRS form and send it in. Do that every time it happens. Enough of that and ASRS will send it on to the FAA, and it should show up in refresher training for us controllers. I highly recommend ASRS, not just when you think you might get dinged for something, but whenever something is FUBAR - it makes a record of the situation and if enough pilots do it, someone will take notice...

Good idea. I hadn't thought of that. I guess if I don't do something about it, I have very little right to complain.


This thread is one of the best I've seen here in a while.
 
Before 9/11, we had a fam program where we could jumpseat with the air carriers, and that's where a lot of us got some real world experience in what you speak of. Now we are having a new generation of controllers check out who've not had that experience, and it shows.

Yep. It's a dirty shame, too.
 
Kream926 said:
heres o few Q's that i have

when told to stand by when do some people read it back?

Because *some* controllers go off on pilots when they *don't* read it back. Doesn't make sense, but it happens. It was mentioned on a thread here recently.
Kream926 said:
when at an airport that only has one taxiway leading to the full length how does callling ready in sequence gonna help the controller? all that hes gonna say back is #xxx hold short. i think that is unnessisary congestion and i dont call untill im #1. and callin ready for departure when you can see someone on short final?

Because *some* controllers will ignore you till you do call ready, or peevishly ask you if you're ready, if you haven't called ready. This also has been discussed on threads here.
 
Runway changes and slam dunks. I try to be conservative here, because of stuff I hear on boards like this, but I work with controllers who use them gleefully; because nobody complains, and some guys will ask for them to get to the airport 30 sec faster. That's right, it doesn't do a dang bit of good for me to tell my peers and trainees "Try not to switch runways on them inside 15 miles" and then have three pilots the next day offer to switch runways at 6 miles to beat the King Air to the ramp. Same for the slam dunks. I just saw an Emb 170 the other night do a dam fine impression of a B727 that I didn't even think was possible in the newer jets. I didn't instigate it, they did it on their own. A non-pilot controller sees that, and some will assume every airliner can do the same.

My complaint about the slam dunk usually comes when their's a regional coming into the airport and the controller is "doing me a favor" by getting me in. Happens a lot at Chico coming from the East and Redding coming from the North and West (read mountains). I know there are MVA's and such but why does one controller insist on 9k 20DME from RDD and another will let me go to 7300 at 20DME? I ask...no one knows. Going from 9000 to 5500 in 3 miles is a lot harder on the old piston twin than going from 7300 to 5500 in 3 miles. Sometimes...sometimes...if the stars align and the controller is in a good mood and his wife didn't yell at him that morning...I can get 6000 at 20DME...oh...I live for those days!!

In my younger days, I'd try to beat feet in, try to shave that 3 minutes off, try to beat the KA with my 340. Ain't worth it boys. You shave 3 minutes...guaranteed you're gonna lose that 3 minutes going home. Guarant-d*amn-teed. If it means that much to you to beat the RJ into SMF or OAK...knock yourself out. I'm getting paid by the hour!

Eric
 
NJA Capt said:
Hold, Why does the "turn the slow aircraft" rule only apply when the slow aircraft is non-airline?? When the overtaking aircraft is corporate, ATC turns or delays the corp aircraft instead if the "slow" airliner. Why the double standard?

NJA, I can't give you an honest answer to your question re a C750. At my place, I don't work with any controller who wouldn't take the opportunity to put a C750 in front of a B737. That's a no-brainer. Now, a C500, ugh, I've worked Cheyennes and Super King Airs that would eat you alive in the climb....
 
NJA Capt said:
How about when the fix is in your own airspace? Many times we file to a fix, then we are read off a full route with radial/dist to radial/distance. No big deal there, but one day I decided to plot that mysterious PBD/PBD compared to the filed intersection. The intersection of the two radials was within 1 degree of heading and less than 1/2 mile from the filed fix. Here's your sign.......


NJA, we had that exact same scenario here for a few years until we got the DPs all published and sorted out. (A sorry tale of Govt inaction if there ever was one...) We were told we had to read the Prefferential Departure Route, (PDR) exactly as it was printed on the strip. Didn't matter if there was a fix 3 miles away on the same radial that would have worked as well. The strips said XXX 088/052 and that's what we had to read. Believe me, we liked it no more than the pilots.
 
While we are at it, I was wondering if anyone else ever has problems dealing with Colombia FSS in MO. These F#cking idiots are the bottom of the barrel! The one lady sounds like she is on oxygen and can hardly breathe. (If you need real time help with a T-storm or any other weather she will gladly read the TAF to you!) The other two guys that I normally talk to can't figure out how to bring up a canned flight plan, so they make me file a new one! It is a crap shoot when you call that place. If you guys have any kids that work at McDonald's and that's not working out for them, tell them to apply to the Missouri flight service station.
 
Vector4fun said:
That's right fellas, some of you are getting a 20 mile final instead of 10 because you won't get that hot-rod jet down and slowed in a timely manner, so I'm not screwing up the finals by trying to shoehorn you into a 7 mile gap at 240 kts and a grand high. You're going to the end of the line.
This is where a nationwide standardization policy would help out. Approach controllers work "their" area, while we are flying into 500 areas. Each controller wants it done the "local way." If you come into the NYC area and slow below 240 kts you get yelled at. Then you go to CLE or IAD and they think people are still flying DC-3s (170 kts???) You enter NYC airspace at +/-2000 AGL. At places like MCO and ATL they vector a downwind at >9000 MSL and give a 20 mile final in VMC.

I am always (ok almost always) glad to help out. I can fly slow and I can come down fast. BUT.....We can't slow down while coming down fast (>2000fpm), the laws of physics won't allow it.

Guys in FTW DFW/DAL.....Thanks for the good job. The only controllers in the US with passing lanes on the arrivals. :D
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom