To the AirTran pilots who replied,
Thanks for your perspective. In a perfect world, keeping our own brands is preferred for both airlines. I don't know if it would be a good fit or not for the two to merge, some of the points are well stated as to why a merger should not from the perspective of AirTran....some of those same reasons would apply from a SWA pilot's perspective also.
Some could argue, with some degree of justification, that AirTran has the greater "growth" potential simply based upon size as compared to SWA. From the perspective from someone who is very junior, any merger with an airline with older average pilots, that upward mobility could be stifled.
Age 60 will only increase retirements at SWA by 120-150 for the nearterm once 2013 rolls around so without growth at SWA, longer upgrades will be the norm. However, the ability to connect many of the 68 (soon to be 69 with Panama City) cities to ATL in which AT doesn't have city pairings on, an argument could be made that a new growth spurt could occur thereby making way for more growth opportunities.
SWAPA has been told we are overmanned, the precise numbers float between 200-350 depending on the time of the year....growth would solve that obviously, whether that comes from new city pairings or frequencies. In the last year, SWA's market share of domestic capacity has grown by nearly 12.98% to 13.85%, AT's has increased only slightly 3.33% to 3.4% but the important thing it has increased...the other major carriers have all seen a decrease so clearly the LCC like AT and SWA have synergies in terms of showing increased market share as significant.
GK has stated that each 1% of passenger revenue miles increases SWA's bottom line by $800m. SWA is still working off the hedge fiasco of last year and the previous year. AT's current CASM is lower than SWA's....some efficiencies would be gained from combining but again at what costs to the morale and expectations. Would Wall Street see a combining of two successful LCC as a plus or minus; capacity coming out of the marketplace isn't the intended goal longterm as any short-term capacity cuts could result in furloughs...no one wants that. Lots of interesting variables at play.
As some have said, it isn't always about $$$ and despite an increase from $153 to $204 for a 12 yr CA and an increase from $74 to $144 for a 12 yr FO, I can fully understand why some at AirTran would still choose keeping the status quo, known expectations vs. unknown (even though in this business some would argue there are only unknown vs. known expectations) and not supporting a merger. Change is difficult and mergers are full of changes to those involved.
The divergence of the topic to speaking about F9 and SWA is unfortunate as it doesn't pertain to the title of the topic but most understand what the purpose of the thread is all about. As someone earlier said, that is all history and how SWAPA and SWA would deal with AT and their employees would be very different I believe....two very different circumstances.
Thanks to those who have replied on theme, it makes for interesting reading and while I realize it is a small sample, it has helped me understand a little better what some of the concerns from the AT standpoint are.....if others from AT wish to continue the "education", please feel free to do so.