Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pay raise for Hawaiian Airlines CEO

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Just got back from a 17 hour day flying in crap weather, and am beat. This thread has gotten interesting huh? Want my opinion? Well I'll give it to you anyway. This "merger" is totally theoretical at best. Rumor and conjecture is all we have at this point, and I have way too much going on in my fuct up life to get too worked up over something that at this point in time does not exist. My personal opinion at this minute (could change tomorrow) is don't sweat this too much. Does a merger make a lot of sense to me right now? Probably not. I certainly hope that the allmighty Dunk knows what he's doing, and that he wouldn't enter in to something that would bankrupt the company (again). God knows I don't want my furlough extended one day more than it has to be, so of course a merger would concern me. I was against the last merger attempt strictly due to a fear of being furloughed. Guess what? I was furloughed anyway.

The biggest problem with this "merger talk" is that it is getting emotional, when it shouldn't be. No one (at least that I know) at Hawaiian wishes any of the Aloha pilot's any hardships. I personally have many friends at Aloha, and hope that they all have long, successful careers ahead of them at AQ. I am also sure that most of the AQ pilot's wish the best for Hawaiian and it's pilots. The days of bad blood between AQ and HAL are over, and I hope that it remains that way. All of the arguments, pro or anti merger are not meant to be "my airline is better than yours" statements.

Flicker Fade, myself, and the rest of the furloughed HAL pilots feel very strongly about the airline, and it's success (as well as our recall). We have watched our airline go Chapter 11, our CEO removed, our company turn aircraft back to Boeing, and a scum bag trustee drag out the bankruptcy for 2 years, hoping that sooner or later, some progress would be made, and we'd be recalled. Almost three years later now, Hawaiian has been making money pretty consistently, they got rid of Gottbuam, and are talking about expansion. The furloughed are finally thinking that there may be an end to their misery in sight. Que merger rumor. Of course it rattles the guys and gals who were finally hoping that they would be back in their comfy 76 in the near future. Of course it stirs up emotions, and of course it wories the hell out of them. It in no way has anything to do with Aloha, or it's pilots.

I guess I am a little worried about how things will turn out, but no one on this board has any power to do anything but complain (which we all will). I have spent the last 3 years giving myself an ulser worrying about this crap, and I am just too tired to continue to do so.
 
mdanno808 said:
No one (at least that I know) at Hawaiian wishes any of the Aloha pilot's any hardships. I personally have many friends at Aloha, and hope that they all have long, successful careers ahead of them at AQ. I am also sure that most of the AQ pilot's wish the best for Hawaiian and it's pilots. The days of bad blood between AQ and HAL are over, and I hope that it remains that way. All of the arguments, pro or anti merger are not meant to be "my airline is better than yours" statements.

I heard a HAL pilot at the "Brenneman Show" say verbatim "Aloha people haven't suffered enough." If I were a HAL pilot, that guy would have gotten a healthy dose from me right then and there at that meeting in front of EVERYONE because he disgraced the entire pilot group with these kinds of remarks.

Like I said, when I jumpseat on HAL, I'm treated AWESOME about 98% of the time. Every airline has 2-5% 'asshole-factor" and one of the now-retired, legendary check airmen at Aloha told me 'you just look at them, smile, and say, THANK YOU - glad I'm not one.'

I just hope that should there be a merger again, that the animosity won't be evident in the cockpit. It's a long 5 hour flight to be putting up with petty crap that neither guy had anything to do with. Last merger - I'd be bringing popcorn on the jumpseat just to watch what goes on after leveling off, or bring a striped black/white shirt and ref the fight.
 
Freight Dog said:
I heard a HAL pilot at the "Brenneman Show" say verbatim "Aloha people haven't suffered enough."

You are right, there are always a couple of idiots at every airline. I've found them at all the airlines I've worked for.

mdanno808 said:
Flicker Fade, myself, and the rest of the furloughed HAL pilots feel very strongly about the airline, and it's success (as well as our recall). We have watched our airline go Chapter 11, our CEO removed, our company turn aircraft back to Boeing, and a scum bag trustee drag out the bankruptcy for 2 years, hoping that sooner or later, some progress would be made, and we'd be recalled. Almost three years later now, Hawaiian has been making money pretty consistently, they got rid of Gottbuam, and are talking about expansion. The furloughed are finally thinking that there may be an end to their misery in sight. Que merger rumor. Of course it rattles the guys and gals who were finally hoping that they would be back in their comfy 76 in the near future. Of course it stirs up emotions, and of course it wories the hell out of them. It in no way has anything to do with Aloha, or it's pilots.

Probably the best and most concise description of what we've been through I've seen yet. Thanks mdanno.

AQ PILOT said:
Still, something aint right with the mentality between our two groups.

That is the real world situation between any two pilot groups when seniority is involved. There has never yet been any merger/acquisition/etc where the two groups get along great, because of the seniority issue. When your experience, pay scale, and seniority are not portable between companies, pilots will fight to the death to protect as much of their seniority as possible.

I do hope it is a false rumor. If not, you can bet that flicker, mdanno, myself, and the rest of the furloughees will fight with everything we have to preserve our places on the HA seniority list. We've fought too hard to let bad business decisions take it away from us.

I also hope that this: http://www.hawaiianair.com/about/corporate/NewsRelease/Section_489.asp

isn't the 'big news' we've been hearing so much about. The marketing guys probably love it, but it means nothing for the rest of us.

HAL
 
Last edited:
Here's what I know. Dunkerly has been asked point blank if there is any truth to the rumor? his answer was "no comment" so read what you want in that. During an informal Q and A in the lounge he did make some points. #1 he said he was very sensitive to the seniority issues and IF there was any deal it would have to include the furloughed pilots. He said they have no interest in Alohas route structure. When asked what is of interest, he said the gates and the inter-island traffic. He said as we speak (8/19) Hawaiian has a team in Australia looking at 8 717's. He said even the 757 is too small for us and they are continuing to look for more 767's. But for sure, any purchase of Aloha assets would not include their trans-pac flying becoming part of Hawaiian Air.

Now before any AQ folks jump on me, let me make some more points. I was in favor of the merger before. Who knows, but if I was betting on it, under Brenneman I don't think any HAL pilots would be on furlough now and I think we would have had about 20 inter-island 717's and a big enough fleet of 767/757's that no one would have been furloughed. Those who got there wish of sticking with Adam's rather than going with Brenneman didn't realize how close to the edge we would get. Anyway, it's water under the bridge.
Now for thinking out of the box, when Dunkerly says they are not intersted in Alohas current business plan and that any deal would first have to include ALL furloughed pilots being back, that doesn't neccesarily mean the AQ pilots have to be screwed. Hawaiian has been looking at generating it's own feed on the mainland. The Chief Pilot confirmed that 717's based in LAS IS being looked at. Who's to say the 8 717's in Australia aren't for inter-island and Alohas 737's couldn't all be based in LAS as a hub feeding our vegas flights? Ranch has a lot of money and they are looking at every opportunity to expand, they know what they are doing and will jump on anything that makes sense.
Finally, the point has been made already, both airlines have a tight pilot group and both airlines have a few arseholes. It's a little foolish to take any comment personally, the arseholes opinions say more about who they are than who they are talking about. The vast majority of pilots at both airlines get along just fine, we all have friends at both. The best man at my wedding was a fellow Hawaiian pilot married to a Aloha FA.
For the Aloha folks, I do have to say, I agree with what everyone feels here, any expansion of Hawaiian with our assets has to include our furloughed pilots first and foremost. We have come a long way and they are part of us that will not be forgotten, Dunkerly seems to agree with the pilots that any deal with our money has to be good for EVERY Hawaiian pilot. That said perhaps there is some synergy between Hawaiian and the redeployment of Alohas assets that could benefit everyone.
It's waaay to soon to start the name calling. Hawaiian is looking at lots of options and I'm sure Aloha is looking at all their options too.
 
Dan, now there's a novel idea... turn our -200's into beer cans as one of your pilots put it back in the merger days and replace them with 717's, turn our ETOPS operation into the mainland feed with 737NG's (way better range on those than on 717) for 767's and get more 767's to expand the long-haul and international routes.

....who is da lolo who stole my pakalolo......
 
I know Dunkerly and Carty have recently met with Boeing and I think we all agree that the 717 is the better inter-island plane and the 737's would be more versatile for feeding LAS.
 
FlickerFade said:
I just don't know how all of this works. HAL isn't as strong as AA was when they bought all of TWA's debt and AA flew some TWA aircraft for at least a while.

APA member, by chance ? This is one of the myths that help them rationalize their hose job of the TWA pilots.

AMR "bought" none of TWA's debt. None, nada, zilch. They assumed lease payments, facility rents, wages, retiree medical benefits, etc., and realized significant cash gains for some of the assets that they later sold, like the TWA share of Worldspan. The whole purpose of the engineered bankruptcy of TWA was so that AMR could acquire assets unencumbered by any attached debt.

And they still have over 100 TWA airplanes, with fewer than 500 TWA pilots left working.

Not picking on you, I just hate to see this drivel perpetuated.
 
Dan,
NOT to start anything here, but when you say the 717 is a better interisland airplane, what are you basing that on? Don't ask me how, but we made money with our 73's these last couple months. I don't know the breakdown of your operation, but out interisland is what saved us. What took you guys down? ER too, or was it interisland?
 
Pay scales come to mind. Also although AQ did make money I think your BK attorney fees sucked a majority of it away.
 
What took you guys down? ER too, or was it interisland?[/QUOTE]


None of the above. It was John Adams. Not sure how close you followed our deal, but as was said in the beginning and time proved it, our Bankruptcy was a scam by Adam's (Boeing proved it in court and he lost control of the airline). We never had any debt just lease rates he said were too high and an underfunded pilots retirement. At the time we were debt free and down to 20 mil in cash as a result of Adams taking 25 mil in cash out of the airline (stock buyback). He has to be kicking himself, by the time he was booted out we had completed the transition to our new fleet and have been making solid profits ever since than. Any losses shown have been paper losses. Our cash level has increased significantly every qtr since (presently over 160 mil unrestricted cash) This last qtr was the first time we showed a loss for a qtr, but it turns out we had an operating profit (our cash level increased), but it was shown as a loss coming out of bankruptcy.
This explains it:

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050818/latu106.html?.v=22


Even more significant, those results include a 10 mil payout for fuel hedges. 40% of our fuel is now hedged (eff june 30).

I'm NOT trying to start a debate here either, but when you make a comment about what brought us down as if our airlines are in the same boat, I have to set the record straight. Nothing personal, it's just apples and oranges. I must say, it's my prespective that Aloha has always talked stink about Hawaiian. In the news they even blamed Hawaiian for their bankruptcy! Not poor management. As far as the 717 vs 737, inter -island, nothing meant by it, I was just saying that your 737's would be better deployed feeding us on the mainland than our 717's (if it happened that Hawaiian started a LAS hub), as the 717 has been an excellant inter-island airplane. I'm sure we agree that you need new aircraft inter-island as the old 737's are terrible with gas prices were they are. Again, nothing personal, just an observation. Expensive fuel and an airplane that burns a lot of fuel are a bad mix.
 
No offense taken, and as you and I have talked about before, Adams is a disgusting creature on all fronts. I don't think he is what has impacted you recently though.

Gotta admit though, I don't like it much the way you put it when you say "like we are in the same boat...." That sounds somewhat condescending. You guys were pretty well bailed out of some pretty nasty crap over there. It's not like you're the next generation SWA.

Before you go off half cocked and take that all wrong, let me head you off at the pass by saying that I hope you guys do become the next SWA. I hope everything turns out rosy for everyone involved at HAL. You think we talk stink about you guys? Especially in the media? He11, our spokesman couldn't put a positive spin on finding the meaning of life! We can't even effectively communicate with ourselves let alone put together an organized "talk stink" campaign!

As for the 737 vs 717 issue. I'm probably gonna have to agree with ya. The higher fuel goes, the better your bird is. Like I said I wont shed a tear when those -200's go away. The lease rates are so inexpensive on them that with reasonable (what is reasonable today anyway) fuel prices, it made more sense than the higher rates you were paying for the 717s.

'nuff of this stuff. I work 2 more days and then I'm off for almost 3 weeks without a day of vacation. When I get back I expect all of you to have this $hit worked out, Dan you're in charge, Freightdog play nice with other.... Just tell me where my locker is and what we are serving for first class....
 
AQ PILOT said:
Just tell me where my locker is and what we are serving for first class....

Dude... where's MY locker?

Now for first class, we're serving dry hamburgers made last month or a week old pizza with a pink ooze as a topping. Going the other way, we serve ramen noodles with some tan ooze and call it alfredo, or the other choice is the previous day's leftovers from Chowmein Express.

Bon appetit.

Hope this helps.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom