That's pretty good, and they all got their frozen pensions. But I do have a question, are their names still on NWA's seniority list?
Bye Bye--General Lee
NWA list update twice a year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's pretty good, and they all got their frozen pensions. But I do have a question, are their names still on NWA's seniority list?
Bye Bye--General Lee
It was three, it my seniority number was correct.
NWA list update twice a year.
01! Hey your prediction still 7-5 ratio with the bottum 3-400 NWA!
Lots of 'em.....you have read our closing arguments haven't you? If so, you would know exactly. Start reading around page 30....Any reason why the NWA snapshot was done on Jan 1st, 2008 (3 months prior to the announcement of the merger) vs July 1st, 2008? DTW320? Nu?
That's one clip.....there are many more reasons given. Read.The significant difference between the two groups’ approaches is the time period
utilized. We used a twelve-month average for the period up to the snapshot date of 12-
31-07. The DAL pilots elected to use a single month, a month that reflects staffing long
after the two companies began merger discussions and several months past the actual
merger announcement date.
Lots of 'em.....you have read our closing arguments haven't you? If so, you would know exactly. Start reading around page 30....
Lots of 'em.....you have read our closing arguments haven't you? If so, you would know exactly. Start reading around page 30....
That's one clip.....there are many more reasons given. Read.
Umm..No. You must not have read the same closing arguments that I did. And, BTW, YOU have NO idea what message the arbitration panel took away from anything. Go back and read again, starting around page 30.Wasn't it so you could count all the DC-9's, 757's, 747-200's, and A319's that you parked this year as being what you brought to the merger? That way you could create a few hundred phantom jobs to artificially inflate the ratios in your favor. That's what I read and I'm fairly certain the arbitration panel got the same message.