Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ohplease! said:oops! did him get hims wittle feewings hurt? awww ,I'm sorry about that. Lighten up pinhead! can't take a joke? You opened the door. I just walked through it. I didn't realize you were such a well school and sophisticated guy. My bad.
now you're getting the hang of it.HoserASA said:But, I did stay at the Holiday Inn Express last night! I'm done...you can have it.
Hoser
My MEC Speaks For Me!
not excited, realistic. go back and look. I said it wasn't a good thing and I'd hate to be in your shoes but, its whats going to happen. No matter what any of us thinks about it.boxjockey said:OHSKEEZ is the same person who was all too excited at the chance of us losing our flying. He's the type of person who only cares to further his own agenda, regardless of what damage it does to others. You need to go work in the corporate world, im sure you would fit right in with all of the backstabbers....
box
GO AROUND said:First question was why we don't have a contract yet? He started that answer with "he fired Billable Bill Hires the company lawyer as of today." That he is still committed to getting the contract done as soon as possible and they are working to do things to do that.
Profit sharing was the next topic and why we still havn't gotten much info on how it relates to us. He said that he gave a presentation to Bob and Dave this morning and that it will be offered to the pilots just like every other group.
Biggest subject was the 70 seat paycut. He was upfront and said that it needs to come down to be competitive in bidding for flying with Mesa and CHQ. It doesn't have anything to do with any other carriers than the ones we compete against for flyingfor DAL. It was put out there that what if that is not acceptable to our pilot group what would happen? "ASA would shrink" was his answer.
Someone asked if the 5 70's that went to SKW was because of our cost and he said yes. He also said that he hears terms like whipsaw between ASA and SKW and that is not what he wants. He doesn't want the two pitted against each other and make things worse but those are the facts.
Someone asked about new bases or mini hubs for ASA like SKW has. He said not at this time for the forseeable future. SLC came up again and his answer changed from last and he said SLC base is at risk for ASA but still is dependent on if DAL grows or shrinks SLC.
Someone then asked what the contingency plan was if DAL goes under? He said we would repartner with whoever picks up ATL and do it quicker than you could believe. The 26 gates in ATL are a big plus in that situation. ATL is too big a hub and there will be others to partner with.
A couple guys said they would be happy with SKW contract. Jerry was very intrigued with this and put it back to them that we would tear up our contract and use the SKW contract? I said no, that there are work rules in their ontract that are nice but there are things we have they don't.
Big subject that came up was the pass benefits ordeal. Jerry said that it was done at the end of the deal with DAL for us and that they temporarily agreed that it would be status qou for three yrs or until they worked it out. He said DAL came back in negotiations and basically told him that they owned our seats and they would go to DAL employees first. I cant show you the middle finger he gave DAL but he said that was unacceptable and told them to F*ck off. So they are at a standstill and havn't talked in about 3 mnths.
Jerry was asked about merging the 2 pilot groups and he said he was not opposed to that if it was best for all involved including the company.
A lot was talked about with the lack of trust with managment. He said that needs to be fixed, is trying to do things to facilitate that and wants ASA to be a great place to work.
It was brought up that ASA has become a career airline and that managment has made it known that if you are here longer than 5 yrs you have been here to long. He said that is not what he wants and is no longer the attitude of ASA managment as far as he knows.
My overall impression is that he is good for ASA and he didn't just sit up there and tell us what we wanted to hear. Good or bad he answered all the questions and it is what it is. As for the contract, every time they got rid of Hires we have gotten a contract in a few months. He said the union and managment sent a message to the mediator to get more dates and get the contract done.
Take it for what its worth, if I know most on here you are too far gone with animosity for managment that it wont matter.
I for one am willing to put some trust in him and believe it when I see it.
ohplease! said:that makes no sense at all to me.
ASA_Aviator said:I, for one, was impressed with Jerry. He seemed sincere an honest. Sure, I don't much like what he had to say, but at least he was direct. I definately like him better than Brian LaBrecque. That guy just comes across as a slimy, tap dancing scumbag.
Well that's just super! You two will make a fine couple, I'm sure. My garbarge man dumps trash all over my lawn when he picks up the garbage, but he sure is a "straight shooter!" Please wake up people! Please!! This is the same show we've seen time and time again, only the actors have changed! Perhaps we really do need more female pilots, at least women NEVER forget anything!:blush:
I was there for the whole thing, and I was glad to hear that our 50 seat pilots are sticking with the 70 seat pilots, even though the 8% isn't coming from them. The pilot group has to act together. I think ultimately the rate will be cut to some degree, but likely not all of the 8% they are asking for. I'm hopeful that the profit sharing does end up to be worthwhile, and that Jerry is right about it making up some of the difference.
You're really glad our 50 guys are sticking with our 70 guys?!??! Are you serious? That's a bit like saying "I sure am glad that during the Gulf war the Navy didn't start throwing the Marines overboard. Golly, that sure was nice of them!" It's a F&^*ing TEAM sport here people!!!! And in case you're not clear on it the team is ALL pilots on property (hopefully someday to include ALL pilot on any Skywest Inc. property)!!!:beer:
That being said, I don't like the attitude I see on here about "only the MEC speaks for me." I am plenty intelligent, and independent minded enough to speak for myself. If I want to go to a meeting to hear what a CEO has to say, I will do so. If I have questions, I will ask them. The MEC may speak for me in negotiations, but I speak for myself when on the line or in a meeting. I don't, for the life of me, understand people who are willing to give up their voices and defer to someone they don't even know, just because that group was elected into power. Use your brains, and speak up if you have something to say!
If you don't know or haven't met the members of the MEC, that is your fault. Go talk to them. They are YOUR voice. If you disagree with them, let them know.ASA_Aviator said:I don't, for the life of me, understand people who are willing to give up their voices and defer to someone they don't even know, just because that group was elected into power. Use your brains, and speak up if you have something to say!
Pogue Mahone said:If you don't know or haven't met the members of the MEC, that is your fault. Go talk to them. They are YOUR voice. If you disagree with them, let them know.
I think you miss the point. No one is going to tell you not to go listen to the man speak, but we are more effective when we speak as one. If you think anything you say in one of these fireside chats changes his opinion on anything, you are being a bit naive.
Save your opinion for your reps, your p2ps, and the CNC. They are the ones at the table. Jerry is just there to manage your expectations, spread doom and gloom (ala our cost structure) and then appear to be the messiah when he throws a little bone your way.
They are a one trick pony.
Hold Fast!
ASA_Aviator said:I think both of you misunderstand me. I'm supporting the pilot group. I make it no secret that I am anti-union though, and no amount of peer pressure or snide remarks will change that. (On the contrary, it will reinforce it.) It is possible to support each other as a group, and still not buy into the union bull. After all, think about the pay increase we all could have across the board if we ditched the union just in regained union dues... Yes, I am bitter that I have to pay dues for a inherently corrupt and manipulative group. The only reason I joined is so I have a vote. (I'm not going to pay for something that I can't vote in.)
Bizjet said::angryfire So ASA Instigator care to name those that are inherently corrupt and manipulative in the union group. Or are you just a cheap myopic finger pointer who wants to blame those that are trying to get us a descent contract. That is what Agency Shop is for--whiners like you who don't want to pay their way!! You can go to work when the rest of us are walking the line if you are so financially strapped. Maybe they will agree to pay you double time to fly struck work pinhead. You and JoeMercant and his significant other can carpool together. Just think of the money you can save. Maybe you can even go to church for confession and then take a couple of Ten Spots out of the collection plate to help pay for your commute.
ASA_Aviator said:I make it no secret that I am anti-union though, and no amount of peer pressure or snide remarks will change that. (On the contrary, it will reinforce it.) It is possible to support each other as a group, and still not buy into the union bull. After all, think about the pay increase we all could have across the board if we ditched the union just in regained union dues... Yes, I am bitter that I have to pay dues for a inherently corrupt and manipulative group. The only reason I joined is so I have a vote. (I'm not going to pay for something that I can't vote in.)
ASA_Aviator said:After all, think about the pay increase we all could have across the board if we ditched the union just in regained union dues... Yes, I am bitter that I have to pay dues for a inherently corrupt and manipulative group. The only reason I joined is so I have a vote. (I'm not going to pay for something that I can't vote in.)
D'Angelo said:Agency shop is for nazis! Only those who voted in the union should have to pay for it! If that were the case though Dr Phil err I mean Duane wouldnt make his big time salary. Yea the alpa koolaid is much worse than management koolaid! as always the truth lies in the middle
D'Angelo said:Agency shop is for nazis! Only those who voted in the union should have to pay for it! If that were the case though Dr Phil err I mean Duane wouldnt make his big time salary. Yea the alpa koolaid is much worse than management koolaid! as always the truth lies in the middle
rjcap said:Documentation of what ?????? Sober up.
I have heard plenty of mgmt promises over the years. I'll believe it when I see it. I will make one promise to you. If JA comes through and turns this place around I will be the first to admit I was wrong and you were right.
Until then, go have some more company kool aid.
rjcap said:With regard to the first get together in SLC, I just noticed that the argument for the 70 seat paycut has shifted from ASA vs Skywest to ASA vs Mesa and CHQ.
I guess this guy changes his story whenever its convenient !
I know, I'm just throwing a tantrum.
GO AROUND said:Documentation of our costs for the 70 that they say is too high. I was in the middle of looking for it when I was called in for a nap. I would have liked to have gone in there and had the numbers to back up my question.
As for me being a Kool aid drinker, look at my past posts and you will see I am a bigger skeptic than most. I was just posting what he said, I never said I was right.
Like I said, you remind me of a two year old.
007 said:What!!
He didn't dangle the Coex's 69 airplane carrot again!!
GO AROUND said:Documentation of our costs for the 70 that they say is too high. I was in the middle of looking for it when I was called in for a nap. I would have liked to have gone in there and had the numbers to back up my question.
As for me being a Kool aid drinker, look at my past posts and you will see I am a bigger skeptic than most. I was just posting what he said, I never said I was right.
Like I said, you remind me of a two year old.
rjcap said:Since you keep referencing your 2 year old son. How is the little bstrd. Have you figured out who the father is yet ??
79%N1 said:Dude, that was pretty low, and despicable. Not funny at all. If I were him, I'd find you and kick the crap out of you for that statement.
rjcap said:Since you keep referencing your 2 year old son. How is the little bstrd. Have you figured out who the father is yet ??