Just to put this argument to rest regarding the DC9's: First, a point worth clarifying regarding NWA scope is that when our narrow body floor is set next
month, the Co. can go 10 below the floor based on 90 76 seaters at Compass and Mesaba. Since they
are only ordering 72 76 seaters, NWA can go an additional 18 below the floor for a total of 28.
This allows NW to go below the 68 forecast for the end of 08' without penalty. We had 92 at the beginning of 08' minus 28 would put us at ~64 without having to start parking 76 seaters. So unless Northwest reopens the contract for negotiation, there isn't much room to park more DC9s.
Secondly, everyone thinks the DC9 is so fuel inefficient compared to more modern aircraft. The truth is that the DC9 has the same fuel efficiency on flights under 1 hr as an A319. It becomes much more ineffiencient on flights over 1 hour. Plus consider that they are paid for and the revenue/flight hr is not bad.
I read recently that a DC-9 is 50% more expensive per seat/mile cost than a NG 737. Thats tough. Thats way more exposure to high fuel costs. With NWA having no replacement a/c on order (other than big RJ's) to replace the 9's I wonder if bigger cuts are coming. In the end, everyone will be hurting if fuel prices continue to climb. Some just more than others.