Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting numbers from the annual reports:
Delta fleet total: 453
Delta MX expense: $776,000,000
NWA fleet total: 356
NWA MX expense: $796,000,000
What do you expect when you've got a bunch of incompetent SCAB mechanics working on your airplanes?
Well if NWA guys get furloughed when NWA aircraft are getting parked, isn't that fair?
Delta is still hiring to staff the 777's...quote]
I thought that I had read somewhere that DAL was going to stop hiring now, with the possibility of starting again next fall/winter. Isn't there a posibility of displacements DAL with the parking of the 20 mainline aircraft (md88's and 757's)
We supposedly will hire another 100 total for the next 3 classes, and then stop until Fall. A displacement probably won't happen, since it costs the company money to pay for moves (family moves). So, what they would probably do is have a normally scheduled bid and just not fill in for the people going to other planes. IF 20 MD88 Captains got bids to 767 Captain, they may only award 5 MD88 Captains as backfill.
We do have 6 777LRs coming in a 3 month span (Dec 31st to Mar 31st) and we crew those planes at 19 crews per plane. We crew an MD88 at 5.5 crews per plane. Those 777s cause a lot more hiring and movement upward.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Point taken, Delta doesn't maintain the fleet too well?
I see a lot of airstart carts hooked up to your 88/90's at dtw. I guess not maintaining the APU's is one way to save on MX costs?
i will probably never get hired at NWA because i work at Pinnacle, but I wish the NWA guys the best of luck. I hope you pull through independent
We supposedly will hire another 100 total for the next 3 classes, and then stop until Fall. A displacement probably won't happen, since it costs the company money to pay for moves (family moves). So, what they would probably do is have a normally scheduled bid and just not fill in for the people going to other planes. IF 20 MD88 Captains got bids to 767 Captain, they may only award 5 MD88 Captains as backfill.
We do have 6 777LRs coming in a 3 month span (Dec 31st to Mar 31st) and we crew those planes at 19 crews per plane. We crew an MD88 at 5.5 crews per plane. Those 777s cause a lot more hiring and movement upward.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Wow, 19 crews per 777, that is high. What are the work rules on that that cause the crewing to be so high (do you do a double crew on most/all of the trips?)
Thanks,
Thanks for the reasoned reply.
Superpilot....
You going to be eating crow my friend. The numbers on the DC9's are astonishingly bad.
Wow, 19 crews per 777, that is high. What are the work rules on that that cause the crewing to be so high (do you do a double crew on most/all of the trips?)
Thanks,
Thanks for the reasoned reply.
All our beyond 12 hour flights are crewed at 2 Capt. and 2 FO's.
Just to put this argument to rest regarding the DC9's: First, a point worth clarifying regarding NWA scope is that when our narrow body floor is set next
month, the Co. can go 10 below the floor based on 90 76 seaters at Compass and Mesaba. Since they
are only ordering 72 76 seaters, NWA can go an additional 18 below the floor for a total of 28.
This allows NW to go below the 68 forecast for the end of 08' without penalty. We had 92 at the beginning of 08' minus 28 would put us at ~64 without having to start parking 76 seaters. So unless Northwest reopens the contract for negotiation, there isn't much room to park more DC9s.
Secondly, everyone thinks the DC9 is so fuel inefficient compared to more modern aircraft. The truth is that the DC9 has the same fuel efficiency on flights under 1 hr as an A319. It becomes much more ineffiencient on flights over 1 hour. Plus consider that they are paid for and the revenue/flight hr is not bad.
ALPA tried to work with AMFA. ALPA wanted to set up a coalition with all of the NWA employee groups so they could all work together and stand behind each other. AMFA's response? "We don't need any help from a bunch of pilots. We can handle things on our own." So, AMFA went their own way. They handled things on their own, and they suffered unemployment on their own.....and why didn't ALPA honor the mechanic strike?
LOL...the VERY LAST place I would troll for people-in-the-know is Airliners.net. Way to pick a "winner".
Fact is, starting in May, NWA can't park any more DC-9s, or any narrowbodies for that matter, without parking 76 seaters.
Nu
All our beyond 12 hour flights are crewed at 2 Capt. and 2 FO's.
Yes, and those types of flights are what 777LRs are designed to do. We get 6 in 3 months time, and supposedly will have up to 40 thanks to our 738 options being able to trade up for 777s.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Interesting numbers from the annual reports:
Delta fleet total: 453
Delta MX expense: $776,000,000
NWA fleet total: 356
NWA MX expense: $796,000,000
Just to put this argument to rest regarding the DC9's: First, a point worth clarifying regarding NWA scope is that when our narrow body floor is set next
month, the Co. can go 10 below the floor based on 90 76 seaters at Compass and Mesaba. Since they
are only ordering 72 76 seaters, NWA can go an additional 18 below the floor for a total of 28.
This allows NW to go below the 68 forecast for the end of 08' without penalty. We had 92 at the beginning of 08' minus 28 would put us at ~64 without having to start parking 76 seaters. So unless Northwest reopens the contract for negotiation, there isn't much room to park more DC9s.
Secondly, everyone thinks the DC9 is so fuel inefficient compared to more modern aircraft. The truth is that the DC9 has the same fuel efficiency on flights under 1 hr as an A319. It becomes much more inefficient on flights over 1 hour. Plus consider that they are paid for and the revenue/flight hr is not bad.
Point taken, Delta doesn't maintain the fleet too well?
I see a lot of airstart carts hooked up to your 88/90's at dtw. I guess not maintaining the APU's is one way to save on MX costs?
Compared to your DC9s? And maybe those are warm air carts for the cabin? How close are you getting to our MD88s and 90s? Security!!! Help!!
Bye Bye--General Lee
I have to taxi by OUR BC concourse everyday which is where 'YALL' park...and it ain't conditioned air hooked up bro...it's an aux power unit for a start. I didn't know you could blow air in the cabin via the start valve?
You sure you're a pilot General?
'Yall' go back to the Smith Terminal...it's more like ATL anyway.
Yeah, no kidding Robert E....he stands up!Sorry I don't go to Detoilet like you do.
I have to taxi by OUR BC concourse everyday which is where 'YALL' park...and it ain't conditioned air hooked up bro...it's an aux power unit for a start. I didn't know you could blow air in the cabin via the start valve?
You sure you're a pilot General?
'Yall' go back to the Smith Terminal...it's more like ATL anyway.
It's probably just a more modern aircraft than you are used to. I haven't flown the 88 in many years and I'm not sure what you were looking at, or where it was connected, but consider that the 88 can use three sources of air for on ground air conditioning.
Ground Sources for Air Conditioning
There are three methods used to cool the aircraft on the ground:
• using a conditioned air source connected at either the left side of the fuselage at the mid cabin area or at the right rear of the aircraft.
• using the APU pneumatics to operate the packs or,
• using an external pneumatic source connected at the aft left side of the fuselage to run the packs.
your plane swallows...
seriously...that's the best you can come up with General???
going to still make fun of me "being in ANC"? does my aircraft "suck" too.
get a clue, dude.
Mookie