Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope for all our sakes that pilots are not still doing this. Why on Earth would you want to pi$$ off 117-137 passengers by having them sit on a hot airplane just to save a few gallons of APU fuel? We are in the customer service field guys. That means keeping the customer HAPPY from the moment they make their reservation to the moment they pick up their baggage off the conveyor. Turn the APU on BEFORE the first passenger steps foot on the aircraft. At destination -during taxi in-, turn the APU on so conditioned air is ready to be introduced into the cabin the moment engines are shut down. Leave the APU on until the last passenger deplanes -or- external air conditioning is hooked up.
Please Please Please do not subject our passengers to hot, and/or low air movement cabin conditions. We need for them to be repeat customers...not go to the competition.
. I have a question for you though. How many sections got ta'd when MB was our negotiator?? Exactly 0.. And if you know MB, you should know why.
.... And I'm not a fugging coolaid drinker..
You've got to be kidding us?? He's been there 9 years and his going to leave and start over at a company that pays 30/hr?? Throw in the 65 issue and that will thwart his upgrade over at CAL. He must be really burned out of the scabs at Valuejet.I walked in a 9 year AirTran captain's resume to our chief pilot here at Continental a few weeks ago. He wants to remain ananamous for several reasons. His reasons were many but overall he wants to have more variety in his flying. He is saving up for the huge paycut as we speak.
IAHERJ
Training costs money, Chief . . . about $22K per pilot . . . so a first year FO is as expensive as a third year pilot. . . . and less productive, since the first three and a half months he's not even flying the line..
You've got to be kidding us?? He's been there 9 years and his going to leave and start over at a company that pays 30/hr?? Throw in the 65 issue and that will thwart his upgrade over at CAL. He must be really burned out of the scabs at Valuejet.
No, he wasn't. You'd have to work here to understand... topic for a different thread if you really want to know.Maybe he was talking about on arrival....
ROFLMFAO!!!I think, historically, you were deprived of air in the birth canal.
Quite possibly this is true for the top 1/3 of the seniority group.IMHO a major reason guys are leaving is because the incompetence of certain management personnel has become rather apparent. IF you could work for the next 20 years for profitable, yet pilot-friendly management, then why work instead for a company that seems to think that the only way to make money is by squeezing the pilot group . . . .
I'll take that bet. I bet you a C-note that the first T.A. that comes around with a small increase in B-fund, a substantial cut in health care costs, and 10-15% raises (just BARELY better than COLA) will pass.People are voting with their feet, and I'll bet that if the company rolled over completely and accepted the Union's proposed pay rates right now, they probably couldn't get it to pass a vote by the pilot group.
It was ValuJet, and FYI there are more scabs at CAL then at da 'Tranny......
I'm speaking to what this pilot group has done the last couple of years to save AirTran millions of dollars. I for one don't appreciate the way this management team has disrespected this pilot group with their childish games. There is no accountability in the middle management ranks and it has lead to poor morale. I wasn't impressed by the VP's letter at all. It was a slap in the face and shows they again aren't willing to face up to the reality of what really is wrong with our operation internally. They hear and do what they want and blame the pilot group when something goes wrong. This pilot group has been very professional and has saved AirTran Millions! I know for a fact a couple of guys who took other offers after that Christmas fiasco and the disrespect shown by management. I'm totally not surprised with the high attrition currently going on.I hope for all our sakes that pilots are not still doing this. Why on Earth would you want to pi$$ off 117-137 passengers by having them sit on a hot airplane just to save a few gallons of APU fuel? We are in the customer service field guys. That means keeping the customer HAPPY from the moment they make their reservation to the moment they pick up their baggage off the conveyor. Turn the APU on BEFORE the first passenger steps foot on the aircraft. At destination -during taxi in-, turn the APU on so conditioned air is ready to be introduced into the cabin the moment engines are shut down. Leave the APU on until the last passenger deplanes -or- external air conditioning is hooked up.
Please Please Please do not subject our passengers to hot, and/or low air movement cabin conditions. We need for them to be repeat customers...not go to the competition.
You are a DumbA$$. That comment just shows what an A$$ you really are.Maybe he wants to be around the professional scabs?
Amen brother. Management is the first to tell themselves how great they are with yet another bonus while at the same time spitting on labor with their uncaring callousness and intimidation tactics. Typical for this airline.I'm speaking to what this pilot group has done the last couple of years to save AirTran millions of dollars. I for one don't appreciate the way this management team has disrespected this pilot group with their childish games. There is no accountability in the middle management ranks and it has lead to poor morale. I wasn't impressed by the VP's letter at all. It was a slap in the face and shows they again aren't willing to face up to the reality of what really is wrong with our operation internally. They hear and do what they want and blame the pilot group when something goes wrong. This pilot group has been very professional and has saved AirTran Millions! I know for a fact a couple of guys who took other offers after that Christmas fiasco and the disrespect shown by management. I'm totally not surprised with the high attrition currently going on.
Having it and using it are two different things altogether. I'd have to disagree with you on that 95% figure.We have gate air at all ATL and almost all outsatation jetways. 95% of the time there is no real need for the APU to be on, and if there is one then mine is on.
Calling our management Frank Lorenzo style management was the start of the piss poor negotiations.
The truth in this entire B.S lies somewhere between what the union and the company have to say.. Its not 100% the company's fault and not 100% the unions fault..... .What amazes me though, is you don't seem to give a rats @ss that MB was sitting on his @ss being payed by the union for the last couple months while doing jack chit... If he was removed from negotiations, his @ss should have been back on line within a month.. Not 4 months later while drawing a salery that WE the pilots pay for..
You (meaning all you "company men") are the reason no progress has happen in the pass. Do you really believe that removing one person at the table would change anything.
After reading this entire thread (and remembering my old nasty commuter job and what we had to go through), can't help myself but to pray that the meh/aai merger doesn't go through.
Wolf, you gotta remember... the majority of the rank-and-file pilots don't suffer anything except for a long contract negotiation without COLA raises.After reading this entire thread (and remembering my old nasty commuter job and what we had to go through), can't help myself but to pray that the meh/aai merger doesn't go through.
Out of my class of 15, 14 are still here over 5 years later.
Really? From what I can tell your contract is a lot worse than AirTran, But hey your management loves you. So you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Wolf, you gotta remember... the majority of the rank-and-file pilots don't suffer anything except for a long contract negotiation without COLA raises.
I've been reassigned ONCE in a year. That includes being on reserve. 99% of the time I complete my flight as-scheduled which means I really haven't been bothered with the management tactic of rescheduling pay.
I was already off for Christmas Eve and simply didn't answer my phone the couple days leading up to Christmas Day when I had to work. No Junior Assignment.
The majority of us don't have a problem and aren't really negatively affected. This place is SO much better than where I came from, that I have a hard time staying mad when I hear something the company is doing, because it doesn't affect me or many of the pilots I know here (I can think of 2 out of dozens I know who were affected by recent side letters and pooch screws).
Do I like the way the company violates our contract? No. Do I like the way our negotiations are going? No. Do I think it affects only a small percentage of the overall group? For now, yes.
THAT'S why I worry about a sub-standard T.A. The Association isn't shooting for anything that would bring us on par with even JetBlue's blended rates, much less SWA, and the rank-and-file guys don't see what the MEC officers see with what management does every day. A LOT of our pilots think this job is fine, and would be happy with a few tweaks (hence the 40/60 split on the last election vote).
I can't imagine that the line operations at MEH are that much better. Most of us come to work, do our jobs, go home, and get paid properly, just like you guys. I don't think it'd be a huge decrease in QOL for the MEH guys to be AAI pilots.
Not that I'm "for" such a thing now,,, far from it, as you already know.
Just my .02 cents.
Get your facts straight. . . . quit being a useful idiot . . . It wasn't Mike Best that made that statement, it was Steven James, who has been gone now for over two years.
Here is the quote . . . and it rings even more true today than it did then:
"Pilot leaders say they're also angry about fat pay raises for AirTran's top executives last year, disclosed shortly after the airline asked for concessions in the next pilot contract. . . . .
"We have a Southwest [Airlines]-style contract implemented by a Lorenzo-style management," complained union official Stephen James, likening AirTran's executives to former Texas Air chief Frank Lorenzo, who was reviled by labor leaders after taking over several big airlines in the 1970s and '80s and slashing costs and jobs.
Invoking Lorenzo is an indirect shot at AirTran Chief Executive Joe Leonard, one of Lorenzo's lieutenants in the mid-1980s. He was chief operating officer of now-defunct Eastern Airlines when it was part of Lorenzo's empire and was ripped apart by labor strife. . . . . .".
.