Which 3 UAE carriers are you against?
I should have said Gulf carriers sorry
Emirates, Etihad and Qatar sorry
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which 3 UAE carriers are you against?
Green, he has a problem with general math, geography and spelling!
Have you learned their language and pillars yet?
Changed your wardrobe maybe
Man that was a great comeback!!!
1. Since everything here is in English, the answer is no!
2. I am Catholic and my family and I go to a Catholic church here in DXB, so no Pillars for us.
3. My wardrobe, yes I did change that, it is a little hotter here than back home in the US so I am wearing shorts and flip-flops more often! Any other questions?
Bill, have you been to Dubai? I live in a very nice villa, in a very nice neighborhood, my kids go to a very nice school where they are getting a great education, I drive a nice car and I have never been insulted or mistreated by any locals! My work rules , they are ok, I fly 80 hours a month, get most of the trips I request and spend 15 to 18 days at home with my family every month. Pay is good and so are the benefits! Are there things here that are not so good, of course! There are things that are not so good every where in the world including back home but as long as the good outweighs the bad, I am happy! Actually my family likes it here and that is most important for me!
.
Those people don't want us there, they treat us no different than the Flips in the Grocery stores or the bangladeshi on the construction sites.....we are guests serving them and they let you know it. Watch out for the flip-flops and shorts during Ramadan....ahhh culture.
(rhetorical)
.
So what is to stop Emirites from having a US base? I can't think of any reason they couldn't. They will have to start pilfering pilots from US airlines to fill the cockpits of all the planes they have on order.
Not saying it's you personally or not, but......living in a foreign country is all about having the ability to respect different cultures rather than judge them compared to your own. If you are in someone elses country why would anyone think they shouldn't respect local customs? Overseas living, just like International travel is not for everyone. But I think those that have a career that includes expat flying have a richer life with wider experience because of it.
Some people have no problems living in foreign countries, others do. But those that do have problems can usually trace their difficulties to their attitude as the problem.
Not me...you are correct, I could care less about where they put me.
I just think they treat women like cattle over there and have lost respect for a lot of them. But if you have to live in the sandbox, the closest place for tolerance is DXB.
I'm confused as to how they treat women like cattle over here.
Can you please enlighten me and explain the ways you saw women being treated like cattle over here?
(GasP) Varmint.....drop your head in the sand and keep it there.
Covering the women up head to toe when its 50C....next door they wont even let them drive. Go the other direction next door and they impose sharia and marry them off at 11 and participate in honor killing etc.....stop defending the underlying extremist medeival attitude they have in the region.
Stay enlightened Varmint....Damascus and Beirut were once considered the safe dream of the sandbox.
So what is to stop Emirites from having a US base?
Earlier you spoke of profiling. I think you were right then, but I have to question this post. Are you denying that you have those sorts of problems over there? You might be in some protected little oasis, but there does indeed exist a problem with treatment of women in the region. Im not interested in splitting hairs or giving DXB or Emirates the benefit of the doubt. It's like profiling, really. As much as you might disagree, I don't see whats going on in DXB as a sufficient solution to human rights. Nor do I see DXB or Emirates as anything but a spoiler or de facto benefactor to the horrible things perpetrated by others from that region, religion or of that decent. After what our Country has had to come in and do in the region, I don't think a single company should come out of there flourishing where US companies are not. Least of all a commercial airline. Maybe I'm not 100% right, maybe not even 50%, I don't know. But I think that discussion ought to take place. It needs to be part of the dialog in what should lead to a national air transportation policy in the US.
I am not denying problems but I didn't make the initial unsupported statement either. Bill said he thought that they just treated their women like cattle over here...so I asked how.
I bolded a portion of your text above. What has the US been forced to come do in the UAE and how does that have anything to do with the UAE and Emirates? It was the choice of the US to go into Iraq and Afghanistan. The UAE supported the war on terror and allowed the US to operate in and out of here. Do you think that decision helped or hurt what other countries in the "region" think of the UAE and did it possibly put a terror target on its' back?
Your last comment regarding US airlines flourishing is understandable. However, if you want unrestricted access to the world you have to offer unrestricted access to the world. I think a free trade and a free enterprise society is much more beneficial and lucrative to everyone involved than a protectionist society is. It forces competition and forces companies to strive for their "A" game if they want to remain viable.
With AA's link up with QR ... Etihad linking up with Deltas ugly sister Air France....the 777X described as the 777EK by Willie W. & Al Baker...
...I think it's pretty obvious where corporate America's priorities lie.
Roll on MIA DTW ORD PHL ATL.
And if the bookings stay like they are now for MXP-JFK...look for more of the same.
fv
So what is to stop Emirites from having a US base?
They'd have to hire US flight attendants. I don't think anyone wants that.
There is no reason a US citizen would fly through DXB or AUH to go to Europe or Asia.
We already have access to the World, and negotiate directly with other countries, not via Gulf Carriers. I would bet that countries like Japan and China don't really want your A380 flying NRT to LAX or PVG to LAX, primarily because it could hurt their own national airlines. Not every country wants you to move in on their own airlines' turf. The 3 big Gulf carriers are going to get so many new planes (wouldn't that involve crushing debt for MOST airlines?), of course they are looking for places to put them.
Bye Bye---General Lee
I am not denying problems but I didn't make the initial unsupported statement either. Bill said he thought that they just treated their women like cattle over here...so I asked how.
I bolded a portion of your text above. What has the US been forced to come do in the UAE and how does that have anything to do with the UAE and Emirates? It was the choice of the US to go into Iraq and Afghanistan. The UAE supported the war on terror and allowed the US to operate in and out of here. Do you think that decision helped or hurt what other countries in the "region" think of the UAE and did it possibly put a terror target on its' back?
Your last comment regarding US airlines flourishing is understandable. However, if you want unrestricted access to the world you have to offer unrestricted access to the world. I think a free trade and a free enterprise society is much more beneficial and lucrative to everyone involved than a protectionist society is. It forces competition and forces companies to strive for their "A" game if they want to remain viable.
I don't think Japan and China think any differently of an Emirates 380 coming in than they do a Delta 747. Both are foreign carriers flying in their country.
Are we discussing Dubai or next door? I've never defended the "region"....I just correct statements that are incorrect or skewed.
Last time I checked, most women in Dubai dressed themselves and didn't have someone dress them. There are no laws stating that the Abaya has to be worn here and there are plenty of women who don't wear it. Some do CHOOSE to wear it.
I asked a simple question.....for you to back up your statement with facts. So far, you have only come up with "covering the women up from head to toe when its 50C". Care to add anymore? The rest of the accusations were for other countries. Because Mexico is in the same region as the US, should I make blanket statements regarding problems there when speaking specifically of the US?
Trying to personally insult someones level of awareness and intelligence to take away from your inability to answer questions and back up statements that you made is a cheap shot. You tend to do that a lot.
The UAE may not have as expansive rights with the same number of countries but they have a good amount.
I don't think Japan and China think any differently of an Emirates 380 coming in than they do a Delta 747. Both are foreign carriers flying in their country.
Lets not ignore the important contributions NWA (absorbed into DAL) made to Japan. They helped start Japan Airlines. In fact there would not be a Japan Airlines without NWA. NWA did similar important flying for China. Emirates isn't going to make that sort of contribution, they have one goal: dominate and take everything. ICAO and "freedoms of the air" came to exist after WW2 because it was feared that US airlines would dominate world air transportation. US airlines were stopped then, why should Emirates, Ethiad, and Qatar not have their growth plans checked just as ours were?
Yeah, they don't mind you flying from their country to YOUR new country. But, your grandiose plans of flying A380s from Haneda to LAX, ummmmmm yeah, they and JAL/ANA may have a problem with that. Same with China. Not many countries want to affect their own people who work for their national carriers. Italy allowed you to fly from MXP to JFK because, well, they are Italy and they are having problems now themselves, and Alitalia too has been a thorn in their Govt's side. Italy was trying to sell off the rest of it to AF/KL, and allowing EK to move in might be a "hint" to get things moving. Most Govts are more like Canada, France, and Germany, which are more protective of their national employment numbers.
Bye Bye---General Lee