8sugarsugar
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2007
- Posts
- 306
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, that isn't entirely correct. First, there is a space problem, meaning gate space. Not enough extra space to bump US carriers out of route after route. Then there is a landing slot problem. Then there is the fact that people from the US won't fly to Dubai first, then backtrack to Europe or even Asia. Too far.
The Europeans, Australians, and some Asia carriers (like SQ) are having problems, primarily because the Gulf cities like Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Doha are in a straight line towards Europe, SE Asia, and Australia. Several European countries like Germany, France, and Austria have imposed limits on EK and more will join them if their own national airlines complain more. The problem with the other countries in Europe is that many of the national airlines are failing financally, and the Gulf carriers are willing to put up some money to buy influence it seems. (But not the biggies like Germany and France). Even Canada limits Gulf carriers to 3 flights per week, with only one city each in Canada. They see the big picture. Etihad has a codeshare with AC though, but it's a flow of pax through London Heathrow.
Will EK and the like affect US carriers in the US? So far, not really. EK will add a route to Milan from JFK and probably abandon it soon after thanks to 4 other carriers (DL, UA, AA, and AZ) doing it too. EK does have a codeshare with JB now that can allow pax to flow into the US, but in JFK the terminals are different, and BOS is the same, no direct access to connections. I guess it's better than nothing....
Will EK and others cherry pick key US routes to key INTL cities? They will try, and it all depends on how the US legacies defend their hubs and how full the airports are. Foreign Gov'ts also don't want extra competition for their own national airlines on those routes. Hopefully EK isn't using the EXIM bank subsidies anymore too. That was disgraceful. That money was for poor nations.
Bye Bye---General Lee
To waste my valuable time correcting General Lee......
http://www.exim.gov/about/whoweare/ no where does it say the Export/Import bank is only for poor nations. Plus, only 12% of all aircraft owned by Emirates were financed through the ExIm Bank.
well, most the US legacy aircraft (regionals) are financed by Canada and Brazil banks. To each his own. I bet those Canadians and Brazilians are upset too...... <*sarcasm*
"gosh darn it, it so SOOOOO un-american that you work for a company that buys American." says the average xenophobe.
The ex/im bank is doing exactly what it is supposed to do, make US products more attractive to export....what a novel idea.. On top of it, Emirates pays back the US Government interest on money it borrowed. As opposed to borrowing money from Europe or China?
what would you suggest? Would you be happy if Emirates dumped the $30billion Boeing order and switched to Airbus?
yep, i'm wrong just like the JFK-MXP flight that you claimed would NEVER EVER happen. ALPA, politicians would stop it dead.
sorry general, as time passes you continue to be proved wrong.
Will EK and the like affect US carriers in the US? So far, not really...
I'll take the higher road, Sniper you are more than welcome to interview here the next time Delta furloughs...if u need the job