Usual Suspect
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2003
- Posts
- 27
So many posts are base upon the logic "he has soooooo much money he should pay us more". That is a very poor premise and outnumbers all others probably 10 to 1.
Funny, any time I wanted a raise I went to my superiors and my basis was always "I should be paid more because ..... I am valuable because ... I do a better job because .... I can make you more money because .... I make the company better because...." My team members who want raises come to me with similar logic. I have never said "you should pay me more because you have so much money and wouldn't notice it" or something similar. But that is the overwhelming position not only on this board, but in the public campaign. It is all based upon NJA's $$.
The pilots know I support them. But the argument, position and strategy being employed is not one of strength and productivity but one of entitlement. Please don't shower me with messages about how productive you are, etc. - while that is true and I agree - that is NOT the emphasis of YOUR campaign and NOT the issue which the union is communicating to the owners. Maybe the union show have a survey company poll a demographic similar to the owners (like marketing companies regularly do) and see if the campaign is effective and communicating the proper message? If there is a "gaol sheet" of the objectives of the campaign, I seriously doubt they are being accomplished as far as the owners are concerned.
I think you're misinformed. When we say that NJA can afford to pay the pilots more, we're merely rebutting the company's claim. Right out of the gate, when the company decided to open contract negotiations, the first thing they demanded was pay cuts, more work for that lower wage, more for health insurance, etc. The reason they gave was that they needed to give BH a higher return. So you see, they are the ones that started the whole "you need to take pay cuts so we can increase BH's profit from 30 billion to 30.1 billion" nonsense.
The pilots never went to them and said "you should pay me more because you have so much money and wouldn't notice it" as you said above. We're merely sweeping aside their absurd demand that we take pay cuts when they tell recurrent classes how much money the company is making, how great sales are, how they had to raise prices on marquis cards because they're selling so many of them and BH's quarterly reports show that NJA is making lots of money.
If you're getting a different message than that, then I agree with your comment about the message needing some clarification. It's hard to explain all that on a picket sign.