Dixon Cider said:
Boisture makes 1.2 million, a man who has been this companies worst manager. The SEC filing last year for the BBJ 121 certificate. We make millions to loan to NJE. We buy and build hangers. We are in what is known as "aggressive expansion" mode. Not profit mode. Millions are being made, its just being spent.
Where do you guys get this number of 1.2M for Boisture anyways? I've seen it posted on this board several times, but have yet to see a reputable source of the info posted. Not that it matters anyways.....what do you think is fair pay for someone responsible for the livlihood of 4,000 employees and their families?
As for the aggresive expansion, I figured you guys would support this...it means the company is growing and most of that growth translates directly into more pilot jobs and more pilot dues for the union. What's your gripe with that?
The company has already said that NJA makes a profit and they are willing to give pilots a raise that reflects that profitability. So whats the problem?
Dixon Cider said:
August 19 Quote: Also, we aren't performing POORLY, (your comment pisses me off), we just quit giving 110%. Now we just give 100%. We do EXACTLY what we are supposed to. Nothing more, nothing less. We do our job.
Dixon Cider said:
August 21 Quote: I give 100%. What I said was, I quit giving 110%.
Care to do any more flip-flopping?
Dixon Cider said:
We aren't sh!tting on you. We just quit covering everyone elses mistakes. We won't fly broke, or tired. That is most of us are doing. It is totally legal. There are a few bad apples, but when the farmer (company) neglects the tree (pilots), a few bad apples will fall.
Despite your protestations, the pilot group is sh!tting on us. Just look at all the derogatory references to flight center personnel, managers, executives, and owners on this board.
I too have been here for years. I know that most of our pilots are great people and that most of the crap that I see on this board is done by a small group of malcontents. But these malcontents seem to be running the show. If you dont agree with their actions why dont you speak up and cry foul? If you fail to speak up then you shouldnt be surprised that people assume you agree with their actions.
And as for the legality issue, I suggest you start educating yourself on the RLA and what is permitted, or else you'll quickly find yourself in the same boat as the APA at American Airlines. Bottom line is that while in negotiations the company is not permitted to change any operating rules and the union is not allowed to deviate from standard operating procedure. Your increased rate of DNIF and bullsh!t writeups could end up costing you a multi-million dollar settlement.
Either you guys start controlling the renegades or you will all pay for their actions.
Dixon Cider said:
I love it here, I just hate how long it is taking and how the company views us. So your summary is correct on my part.
The old local and funk five MEC took three years. This new group has taken only 10 months to get a better deal at this point.
Sounds to me like your anger is misplaced. The company bargained in good faith with your duly appointed representatives and reached an agreement with them in late 2004.
The pilots didnt approve of that agreement and voted it down, which is their right. They also voted out the old leaders and replaced them with a group that you feel is more in tune with what you want.
The company has been right there, willing to negotiate with any representative you care to put forward. They have also been instrumental in getting a better deal done in just 10 months.
To go back to your analogy - the company can only deal with the people you put forward. If your representatives are out of touch, who's fault is that? Why are you hostile to the company for your MEC being out of touch?
Dixon Cider said:
There is the problem right there.....the books that the company is offering are not ALL of the books we want to see.
The company claims to have offered all NJ books for review. What books do you want to see that they have not offered? Geico? Dairy Queen?
I dont think NetJets has access to those, and I dont think they are pertinent to these negotiations.
Dixon Cider said:
By your board name, I assume you are a family guy. Well so am I. After child support, I have enough for rent and a car payment. Not much else. I fly the richest people in the world. Charter companies can turn a profit, why is it Netjets cannot (supposedly)? I don't believe they are not making enough money to give us a raise to bring us in line with the rest of the market.
Yes, I am a family guy. That is what is truly important to me. I have the same money concerns that you do. I could use a few extra dollars, who couldnt? But am I willing to burn down my house to get it? No thanks.
So you fly the richest people in the world around. Big deal. Does that mean you are entitled to something? It sounds like you feel that way in your mind.
You are entitled to a fair days pay for a fair days work. Nothing more, nothing less.
NJA is making a profit and they've put a respectable raise on the table that puts you ahead of Flight Options, FlexJet, and Citiation Shares. As you and many other pilots on this board have already acknowledged, you already have much better work rules and conditions than our competitors. What else do you want?
From my perspective, you want airline rules and Corporate flight dept pay. Aint gonna happen. You need to make up your mind which business model you want to be compared to. You cant cherry pick the best of both worlds. When you do that the managers have to do their jobs and protect the business. They cant agree to terms that would cause the company to lose money....this would put everyone out of a job.