CE750Driver said:
Netjets pilots are not your enemys.
Then you must be our friends.
Wait... No friend of mine will put my job in jeapordy for his own personal benifit. Sorry, but you wreak of hypocrosy.
Conversely, who said anything about being an enemy in the first place? The only people I've heard bring up the topic are NJA pilots.
Let's make it simple (again). You won't find too many people in the Casino who won't support a pay raise for crews. That's never been the issue for them. Most people never cared until recently when the issue of the strike came up. That is what people are concerned with - not your paycheck. See, we can be just as selfish. Most really only care about there own livlihood when it comes down to it.
It's not what you want, it's what you threaten to do if you don't get it. This quote sound familiar from anyone you know recently???
“Suck it up, we’re at war here!” So the flow of information will be unrelenting until our objectives are achieved
or the doors are closed." [emphasis mine]
So whose the real threat? If the company gets their way Casino employees are safe - if the pilots don't get what they want - sounds like the only thing they care about at that point is revenge. Ya, keep trying to make me us feel like you're the victim and you're on our side.
CE750Driver said:
We are asking for and will not accept anything less that what NJI has. How can the company claim we woud go out of business to pay us more, then on the other hand pay another section of the company in this manner. NJI flys from home, I thought this would break the company? Really, ask yourselves why is there a split here?
Fact is you don't know what the bottom line is for either company - it's all perception until Union leaders actually want to look at the facts. Very telling that they continue to refuse the company's offer for the books to be opened by a third party.
CE750Driver said:
You ask why one of our MEC would not sign a non-disclosure form. This union has said they always will keep the lines of comunication truthful and OPEN. The fact that this man would not sign it, even though it would make him look bad to some people, should show you the resolve and INTEGRITY of this man. A man of lesser character may have broken, signed it, and broke his promise to the pilot group. I applaud him. You should too.
I'm rather pleased with him myself. If he continues to keep it up - the threat of a strike becomes less and less likely as the mediator can clearly see that the union is unwilling to have reasonable discussions and look over vital financial information. In order for the union to release you to strike, Netjets has to be found faulty at some point in the bargaining process. So far, that just isn't happening - no matter how badly you want to punish the company for not paying you what you want.
You're paying them to bargain a new contract - seems like that isn't even on the unions mind anymore (or the pilots they represent) - I could be wrong. The non-disclusure issue seems to make that case. What's more important? Do you want all the nitty-gritty details or do you trust your MEC chairman to handle the facts on his own and get you a new contract? Non-disclosures shouldn't become a road block in these kinds of negotiations.
CE750Driver said:
You ask why we will not believe the chosen books provided by management, when they do not contain much of the truth. Does it show the 57 dollar quarts of oil at our own facilties, does it show the overpricing that FlightSafety charges Netjets? That money goes from one BKS pocket to another. Is that money shown on the profit line. Who insures our airplanes? Is it a BKS company? Are they competitive rates or is money shifting pockets there too? What about the money customers pay up front for engine reserves, they pay up front and the engines are done every 4 or 5 years. What is the interest on that amount of money? Is it shown on the profit line? How bout the loans to NJE? Are they paying them back? With Interest? A zero interest loan would save the company millions wouldnt it? Would that be shown on the profit line?
There are so many more examples. Can you honestly tell me that this isnt happening? If so, you are naive.
Can you say
you know the motives, reasons, facts, figures behind all the business decisions? Did they ask for your advice?
PLEASE... stick to flying planes. That's all they need you for.
CE750Driver said:
You ask why we would take this job and yell about the pay 7 years later. I took this job to build time and leave. RTS spoke at Hamilton road in my first year. Yes Brideway was not even a dream then. He told me and about 100 pilots directly, that he would make this the place to be in aviation. He told us he realized the pay was low and it would change. He spoke with such conviction, I, and a lot of pilots belevied him. ITS BEEN 7 YEARS. Time for him to put up or shut up. I have done my part to keep this gorrilla growing. It is his turn. Is he the type of man that will go back on his word? Does he have half the integrity our union leadership does? We will find out.
Alot of you have become unwitting pawns the company is using against the pilots. This is sad. Believe half what you hear from management and realize even the true parts will be spun. Please keep posting your questions, but with the tone that is used most of the time, its hard to believe that you dont see why most pilots see it as flame.
Funny, the only one trying to tell me how I should feel is pilot groups. I started thinking for myself quite a while ago.