Mr. Chupacabra. First, all, and I mean ALL, fuel costs are paid directly by the share-owners so your suggestion won't save or cost the company a dime. The only way the company can ever save money on fuel is on most ferry legs. We are starting to learn even reducing the speed on your ferry's is not saving as much as we originally projected which has something to do with MX/airframe time, etc.
Let me address some earlier posts simply by saying:
-No one is suggesting or has suggested in this post they wouldn't like to see your pay increased.
-No one said you guys don't do a good job and your level of service has not been criticized - even though you chose to slander the quality work by the dispatch dept.
-No one has said the company has not been profitable (except for this year's $6 mil loss) - only debating to what extent and how much they can afford to pay salary increases.
I am suggesting:
-The company has not initiated a smear campaign against pilots. Actually quite the opposite. In January 2005 NetJets began a pilot recognition program to show its appreciation to flight crews who demonstrated excellence. On April 20, 2005, the first recognition rewards were presented to one Flight Attendant and three Pilots, for their superior contribution who will be rewarded with a letter of commendation. In addition the amount of respect and gratitude from Bill Boisture himself on the behalf of pilots has been truly amazing. Smear campaign? Turning co-workers against you? Hardly.
Some Dude said:
The fact that you don't think that RTS would never lie to you and that he ( the company ) has a proven track record is just plain stupid, or it shows that you haven't been here very long.
I truely hope that you and the rest of the personel in CMH get the money that you deserve. (Except for Owner Services because they are nothing but liers). Educate yourself then you may get that raise at your next review.
>>>
One more thing can you really trust RTS after he allowed the schedulers to accept gifts and kickbacks from some loser pilots for better schedules? The schedulers should have been fired and the "A team" should have been fired long ago.
-Owner Services and Schedulers are not liars. For you to say this lets me know your level of integrity and lack of understanding. I have worked with both of them and seen the challenges they face and do the best they can to do our owners right. Do they make mistakes? We all do. Do they make the best decisions they know how with the information available with the best possible intentions? We all do. Does it always turn out right? No. Do we have to be accused of lying because of it? Apparently.
I have already mentioned in other posts that allegations made regarding "gifts" was formally investigated by a third party and the allegations were found to be false. You might have missed that memo.
RTS, from only my personal observation over the years, has not only kept his word, I have seen time and time again him going above his duty to benefit the employee. He never fired a single person when it would have been the proper business decision to do so during the recesion following 9/11. We were fat on personnel and he promised no one would lose a job - and kept it. How quickly you forget. If he has lied to you, then I don't know anything about it. I can only judge from my own experiences.
Some Dude said:
Yo! Dispatcher I have been here a looong time way before we even had dispatchers at eja/nja. Maybe you should thank me for your job. It was the pilots who fought to get a dispatch department set up at eja/nja.
I guess you were hoping I wasn't around then to know better. I'm calling your bluff. Not only was I an original member of dispatch I was hired long before it came into existence. You taking credit for dispatch is like Al Gore taking credit for the Internet. I know the people responsible for this department and you weren't one of them.
x402 said:
I was sent to BACK UP A VENDOR FLIGHT!!!!!!!!!!
Scheduling doesn't consult you either, I bet.
-NetJets only uses vendors to fulfill contractual obilgations and normally loses money by doing so.
You have to understand the basic concept for applying vendor trips. If I own a Hawker and the QS tail breaks and a QS tail of EQUAL or BETTER size/quality can't cover it and a vendor is called in - the vendor has to also be equal or better. Many times it will be better and we'll have to pay for a GIV or something but only take in revenue for a Hawker. In addition, if the owner is upset enough the company may choose to give him discount for the trip. You simply aren't considering the factors involved behind vendor coverage.
I don't know your specific example but if you were backing for a vendor trip than it was likely because you were not the equal or better vendor the owner was expecting or paying for and was likely the "last resort" in order to get the owner to his destination on time - a good business decision by NetJets. If your a/c was larger or better than the one you backed up perhaps it was an "over kill" and not what the owner wanted either. Still the right decision by scheduling. So why are you worried about it? I don't get it. The paranoia is out of control.
Some Dude said:
... If shutting down this place is what it takes then so what? RTS and Boisture PROMISED you that nobody in the flight center would be laid off. So, why are you scared of us striking?
Actually Boisture didn't promise no one would lose their job per sey. What he said exactly was that there would "still be work to do in the event of a strike". We have no contract, no gaurantees, no promises in the event it becomes out of control and detrimental. And he was speaking to the entire company. As for dispatchers, if QS tails aren't flying, there is no work for us to do, unlike owner service and scheduling. It's one "vacation" that I hope can be avoided. I am hoping for succussful negotiations over the next few months and we can get back to focusing on what we all do best. Keep'n em' flyin. Stay safe out there.