Net Jets Gateway Cities

[Quack]

Heard a rumor that NetJets was interested in reinstating its gateway city idea? Just curious if it's rumor or fact? thx

 

[theskyking]

Clicky...

http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?t=102809

 

[CA1900]

Heard a rumor that NetJets was interested in reinstating its gateway city idea? Just curious if it's rumor or fact? thx

Kinda sorta. The union and company have been in negotiations for a while now, and will be presenting a package for the pilot group to vote on. Among the changes will be a list of 100 crew bases (versus the 5 domiciles we have now), which were listed in this thread.

The package will be presented to the pilots on October 1st, and we'll be voting on it about a month later, I believe.

 

[skiandsurf]

The reality is that Netjets wants to give us all a pay raise, but the union wont accept the pay raise without opening more gateways.

So yes, more gateways if the pilots are willing to take a pay raise.

 

[IDEtoNJA]

The reality is that Netjets wants to give us all a pay raise, but the union wont accept the pay raise without opening more gateways.

Ski,

I am sorry! But, this is one of the most ignorant statements I have seen lately -- even for this board!

I know you follow the IBT board! Please ask your elected leadership and/or other volunteers whether the company WANTS to give us a raise on their own accord! I know you don't believe that one bit!

Thanks

 

[skiandsurf]

Ski,

I am sorry! But, this is one of the most ignorant statements I have seen lately -- even for this board!

I know you follow the IBT board! Please ask your elected leadership and/or other volunteers whether the company WANTS to give us a raise on their own accord! I know you don't believe that one bit!

Thanks

Sarcasim

 

[Big Wave]

Sarcasim

I did all of my early training to fly the Sarca in the Sarca sim. Outstanding training provided by experienced instructors!

 

[say again]

I did all of my early training to fly the Sarca in the Sarca sim. Outstanding training provided by experienced instructors!

:laugh::laugh::laugh:!!!!!

 

[FLYLOW22]

Heard a rumor that NetJets was interested in reinstating its gateway city idea? Just curious if it's rumor or fact? thx

NJA pilots have no reliable means of commuting about the country to and from work.

NJA has no real "hubs" or "bases" in the truest airline sense of the word.

NJA has no real schedule, per se, dictating that a certain type of plane will pass through from XYZ-PDQ at 10am M-F.

As such, NJA has a unique problem in positioning crews that they have solved by using planes, trains and automobiles to get crews into position with a plane.

NJ management has tried to control costs (in this time of record profits for NetJets) a bit too bluntly by restricting the pilot domiciles for newhires to the number 5. In doing so, they overshot the mark a bit and turn many qualified applicants away due to the restricted basing program.

I know... I'll hear the rhetoric that NJA has "no shortage of applicants to work for this fine institution" but the FACT is that if we are not attracting and retaining the finest of the pilot pool available out there then we just aren't attracting the pilots most sought after. I'm not saying the pilots we're getting are bad so please don't get offended.

Pilots on property in the fall of 2005, meanwhile, continued to live in 200+ cities called HBAs.

How does NJ management continue to ratchet on costs yet deal with the cernain uncertainty of the Frax business?? IBB.

Problem for the pilot group... how do we allow 2 factions of pilots to be in one seniority list (Restricted HBAs/Crew Base) and NOT think that it won't come back to bite us in the ass... again?

No, NJA does not want to go back to the 25 base model. Not that anyone I've talked to has heard.

The magic number is 100, but 100 is a dirty number so far (dirt in the details).

Does

 

[Guitar Guy]

Wait until early October to get a better read on what's potentially happening with basing at NJA. That's when we'll have a proposal containing all of the possible changes, including basing.

 

[DO-82 driver]

The HBA issue is far from the problem at this point. So many rules will be changed that people are going to be able to vote against the proposal based on a host of issues.

Yes, I'd like the post-rat guys to be able to fly from airports closer to their homes but I am not willing to give up certain work rules I voted for under our current contract.

This process seems to have gotten way out of hand.

This isn't an amendment to the current contract, its practically a total re-write.

And how many contract pass on the first shot?

And if the rumor about the negotiators not talking moeny until AFTER the vote is true.....well then I guess that might just doom the whole thing.

Again, I'll wait and review the final document.

 

[Guitar Guy]

This isn't an amendment to the current contract, its practically a total re-write.

It's amazing how large this IBB thing has grown. It's almost like Lay's potato chips: betcha can't re-write just one section.

And if the rumor about the negotiators not talking moeny until AFTER the vote is true.....well then I guess that might just doom the whole thing.

Again, I'll wait and review the final document.

Honestly, I really can't believe that our MEC and negotiating team would put something out for a vote with money "TBD at a later date". But the MEC is hosting meetings in CMH every Wednesday for the rest of the IBB period. If you can't attend one of those sessions in person, perhaps someone can ask the question for you and relay the answer.

As for waiting and reviewing the final document, those are indeed wise words. I hope most, if not all, of our co-workers will take that approach.

 

[imacdog]

And if the rumor about the negotiators not talking moeny until AFTER the vote is true.....well then I guess that might just doom the whole thing.

Again, I'll wait and review the final document.

What a silly rumor. It's been debunked anyway.

 

[DO-82 driver]

Agreed....the rumor has been de-bunked and is no longer a concern.

 

[brokeflyer]

yup the IBB will be dead before oct 1st....

the word on the board is big fat NO and everyone knows it......unless some major changes are made to it, its not gonna go anywhere....

 

[DO-82 driver]

Agreed....too many changes in too short of time.

I'm not going to make the same mistake I did back in 2005.

The Company needs more pilots based on their a/c orders and they can'y get them. After all, the Domicile system is working just fine for them. No need to change that.

I'm OK with where I'm at.,,,,2010 is fine by me.

 

[Hand Commander]

please, please, please open up at least one city in the Pac NW! Would love to work there but not a fan of LAX as the only westcoast option.

 

[skiandsurf]

I'm OK with where I'm at.,,,,2010 is fine by me.

I hope I fly with you, or other NO voters. I will do my job, as described in the FOM. I will not clean the cabin. I will not get the catering. I will do all of my duties in the cockpit, and when the passengers leave, I will be right behind them.

After the last flight, I will go to the hotel while you clean and restock the plane. And dont forget to put the engine covers on.

See you in 2010.

 

[RideandDrive]

Unfortunately the ibt1108 site has the same 30 loud mouths that post with some regularity. If the changes make it to a vote, I believe it will pass via the silent majority.

 

[gutshotdraw]

Agreed....too many changes in too short of time.

I'm not going to make the same mistake I did back in 2005.

The Company needs more pilots based on their a/c orders and they can'y get them. After all, the Domicile system is working just fine for them. No need to change that.

I'm OK with where I'm at.,,,,2010 is fine by me.

What was the mistake? Did you vote no? (Sarcasm alert)

Not to re-open a very old can of worms, but I thought you did pretty well with the '05 contract.

Now, as then, I'm guessing most are waiting for October 1 to see an official copy of the FULL PROPOSAL before making their decision.