Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

MN crash

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quimby
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 34

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I don't buy this "bullying owner/customer" thing. If I had 100 million dollars in the bank I would have A LOT to live for. Certainly not worth toying with weather and a little 20K pound jet. It's called Pilot In Command.
 
No difference between a small or large plane when it comes to WX; remember the L-1011 accident in DFW?
 
I don't buy this "bullying owner/customer" thing. If I had 100 million dollars in the bank I would have A LOT to live for. Certainly not worth toying with weather and a little 20K pound jet. It's called Pilot In Command.

Bullying by owners/customers happens every single day all over the place, and unfortunately ALOT of pilots bow down to that crap.

Not saying that it happened here. I think the pilots, or the captain anyway, simply made a bad choice to land when he had pure evidence of pretty strong wind shear on a 1 mile final.
 
Bullying by owners/customers happens every single day all over the place, and unfortunately ALOT of pilots bow down to that crap.

Not saying that it happened here. I think the pilots, or the captain anyway, simply made a bad choice to land when he had pure evidence of pretty strong wind shear on a 1 mile final.

I'm confused. Where did you see that they had stong wind shear and KOWA. I thought I heard a windshear alert given out by the RST controller. I was assuming he was talking about Rochester. I may be wrong but I would highly doubt that OWA has windshear alerting equipment.
 
I don't buy this "bullying owner/customer" thing. If I had 100 million dollars in the bank I would have A LOT to live for. Certainly not worth toying with weather and a little 20K pound jet. It's called Pilot In Command.

But you don't have 100 million and based on that comment and your "little Jet" remark you have obviously not flown folks who do. Very often their ego is just as big as their bank account. They do not accept the word no very well.
 
I like, "Safety is my concern, not your appointments."

And I'm not kidding, I've said it to many people.

sure ya have...

Im sure your employers love that line. "me PIC, me in charge"....

There is nothing to prove, no contest. The pax can say what they want, stomp their feet. Its our job to smile, be sure their catering is right (LOL) and simply fly the plane safely from Point A to B (or its alternate).....regardless of external pressure.

Hold your line on safety (In a polite way) and never fly for a place you cant walk away from in 2 seconds.
 
I think the pilots, or the captain anyway, simply made a bad choice to land when he had pure evidence of pretty strong wind shear on a 1 mile final.

This is EXACTLY what upset me so much about the ATC clip supplied by WCCO. The average Joe, and obviously many pilots, will take these two pilots for absolute fools for landing with reported windshear and excessively high winds. The windshear was reported from an airport nearly 40 miles away! And even if the RST controller was running all 3 freqs, they'd already switched to advisory freq and never would have heard it. Better yet, even if they had heard it, it didn't apply to their airport.
I feel terrible for these guys. Not only for what happened but now how the misinformed perceives them thanks to that clip.
 
sure ya have...

Im sure your employers love that line. "me PIC, me in charge"....

There is nothing to prove, no contest. The pax can say what they want, stomp their feet. Its our job to smile, be sure their catering is right (LOL) and simply fly the plane safely from Point A to B (or its alternate).....regardless of external pressure.

Here here, Gulfstream 200. Like it or not, all of you are replaceable. There is another guy just like you who would love to fly for these guys and who won't give them any crap. Not all employers are like that, but my husband has worked for a few of them. Sucks, especially when they don't offer life insurance to guys with families.

I'm praying for all families invovled...
 
This is EXACTLY what upset me so much about the ATC clip supplied by WCCO. The average Joe, and obviously many pilots, will take these two pilots for absolute fools for landing with reported windshear and excessively high winds. The windshear was reported from an airport nearly 40 miles away! And even if the RST controller was running all 3 freqs, they'd already switched to advisory freq and never would have heard it. Better yet, even if they had heard it, it didn't apply to their airport.
I feel terrible for these guys. Not only for what happened but now how the misinformed perceives them thanks to that clip.

Who reported the 20 knot loss of airspeed on a mile final?
 
sure ya have...

Many times......

And alot of other good ones. Its all in how you go into a job, I lay out my demands at the interview. Just like I just did with the new company I'm starting with.

Im sure your employers love that line. "me PIC, me in charge"....

Thats correct....IN CHARGE!!!! Plane parks on the ramp, they are in charge again. Pretty simple.
 
Here here, Gulfstream 200. Like it or not, all of you are replaceable. There is another guy just like you who would love to fly for these guys and who won't give them any crap.

Problem is: Most pilots need any job they can get. I won't fly for the type of owner that is in the cockpit every 5 minutes and hounding you all the time while your flying. Not worth it. There's actually too many jobs out there with owners/companies that do not do that cheezy crap.

My friend "worked" for a 91 operator (Global Express, Challenger 604 and a Lear 60), the owner was typed on two of them and thought he was JoePilot. He would actually be in the cockpit inbetween the two pilots helping them with the checklists. On final approach he would drop flaps and mess with other items. All the pilots had to get together with the D.O. and threaten a walk-out if it didn't stop. It stopped immediately. But you have to have the balls to tell these owners, thats all.

Its either fly and be a happy/safe pilot or fly and be a miserable/unsafe pilot, I choose to be happy/safe in the cockpit.
 
Many times......

And alot of other good ones. Its all in how you go into a job, I lay out my demands at the interview. Just like I just did with the new company I'm starting with.



Thats correct....IN CHARGE!!!! Plane parks on the ramp, they are in charge again. Pretty simple.

Of course you are "IN CHARGE" there Captain PIC..:0 ....but my point is that kind of attitude might find you bouncing between rather crappy jobs! - YMMV

Most of us know who is in charge without having to confront the passengers about it.

And really, do you fly these kind of jerks on a regular basis?....you gotta wonder about the quality of the job itself.

At my present job (about 6yrs) I, nor the 18 other pilots I fly with, have been questioned in the least about a safety/weather decision...and we have some VERY demanding execs.

Its all in the presentation IMO. We give realistic predictions and provide acceptable alternatives FAR IN ADVANCE to get the person where they need to go, thats the goal right? your existence as a department? I thought it was simply your JOB as Captain PIC IN CHARGE?

some simple examples:

Snow storm predicted? advise 24hrs out that leaving 8hrs early/late might be necessary?

Severe Tstorms? - advise early that delays can be expected (show up early!) - car standing by at alternate airport?

Fog Predicted? - again, cars on stby at clear alternate? can we leave earlier in case as to not delay your meeting?

A last minute "My job is to fly the plane, not worry about your meetings" is just not acceptable where I work....and Safety is simply a given. No need to declare it.

Remember who you work for!
 
Last edited:
Who reported the 20 knot loss of airspeed on a mile final?

Apparently someone landing at the RST airport. Unless somebody has read an article saying a 20kt loss was reported at OWA? I haven't seen one saying anything about a shear at OWA.
 
Apparently someone landing at the RST airport. Unless somebody has read an article saying a 20kt loss was reported at OWA? I haven't seen one saying anything about a shear at OWA.
The 20 knot loss was reported at the end of the audio clip (see post #14) for RWY 31 at RST. That came well after cancelling IFR and cleared for advisory frequency change.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom