Maybe a reson to vote Dem.

[Rez O. Lewshun]

With all due respect, all YOU care about is YOURSELF. "My job, my profession . . ." All things are secondary to you keeping your precious airline job. All other issues facing America are secondary.

Typical.... accuse others of what you are guilty of...

Professions are important to the common good of the public.... ask your doctor.

I can respect that. Yet you fail to list a single specific federal policy or proposal that would further this effort, beyond pension reform, which is pointless as few airlines have pensions anymore.

I never meant to list anything... however I'll give you the congressional agenda of ALPA.

Foreign Ownership
FFDO
Flight Time Duty Time
Collective bargaining
nmb appointments
etc..

"The government" will provide everything you need/want. How? I listed some possibilities on what could be done to strengthen airlines in the US; try and do the same to prove you have some inkling about business, energy, the free market and the US economy.

Air Line Pilots are responsbile for the economy? What are you doing about these things? Voting for POTUS?

While I pity pilots who lose their homes and their jobs, I can tell you that it will never happen to me.

This suggest you are 24 years old. How old are you?

Live below your means, always keep a 6 month savings reserve (minimum), and have a backup plan. Basic responsible Adulthood 101.

I've done that. Got any other great ideas?

If your plan is "the gub'erment gonna' save me", you're a fool.

So I guess FFDO's are just gov't welfare recipients that lobbied congress the right to carry guns and defend themselves, their crew, pax, aircraft, the profession and country. According to you they should just let the terrorist let in....

 

[Jmoney]

Liberal.....

There is no reason to ever vote for a f--king democrat. There is more to this than your airline job. A vote for a democrat is a vote to provide free everything to the masses. What money you have will be gone once those liberal POS gets into the White House.

I agree.....

As a kid, I used to wonder why my Grandparents disliked Jimmy Carter so much.... After watching that idiot buddy-up with every anti-U.S. dictator in the whole freaking world, I have come to better understand their concerns. This Curious-George-looking freakshow makes Carter look ultra-conservative. There is no telling the damage he would do to our economic freedoms and civil liberties.

I would much rather risk the short-term damage to my career that you all seem to be so afraid of than risk losing whatever if left I value of this country. There is more at stake than what the govt. can do to protect your career.

Personally, I would rather pay for my own healthcare than pay 86% taxes and get it for "free."

 

[Nightrain_080]

Ah. The only issue pilots are allowed to vote on is "their profession." As defined by you.

Neither my happiness nor my livelihood is determined by my job. How pathetic for those pilots who fall into that trap. I didn't think you of all people were inflicted with SJS. It's just a job.

When the airlines shrink by half and most of us are out for good, I'm gonna remember the good times and move onto something better. America still rocks and is the absolute land of opportunity. Christ, reading your dribble you'd think we were in the great depression or something. Go talk to your grandparents and find out what real poverty, suffering and despair really is.


Thank goodness it's one man, one vote. Pricks who run around looking down their condescending noses telling everyone else what's good for them make me sick.

your right! It is just a job.

Although maybe this country needs a real lesson. 4 years of comrade nobama might wake up the USA. You really think your going to get a middle class tax break? Dream on. Try polling some docs or people in the medical field and see if they support socialized medicine. 9 out of 10 know its the path to horrible service.

I never thought I would be hoping that Hildabear gets the nomination. At least she has some experience. The pant suits may even only be able to hold 4 years. I could almost hold the puke in for 4-8 yrs of more clinton vs comrade nobama.

Oh and by the way I love reverend wright. He is a great associate of nobama. A real close friend of the family. If I were really worried about my lively hood, I wouldn't be voting for someone that associates themselves with such a worm like reverend wrong.

"oh just a second sweetie"

 

[andyd]

This Curious-George-looking freakshow makes Carter look ultra-conservative. There is no telling the damage he would do to our economic freedoms and civil liberties.

Yes! Another ignorant racist comes out of the closet! We have lost more civil liberties in the past 7 years since they we're signed into law with the bill of rights. Gawd you freakin rightwinger's never cease to amaze and sicken me.

You deserve what is comming.

 

[spinproof]

Yes! Another ignorant racist comes out of the closet! We have lost more civil liberties in the past 7 years since they we're signed into law with the bill of rights. Gawd you freakin rightwinger's never cease to amaze and sicken me.

You deserve what is comming.

So Hussien Obamma's comment that his Grandmother was a "typical white person", isn't??? How about Obamma's wife saying for the first time in her life, she is proud of America???
What exactly is coming we should deserve???

 

[Jmoney]

Curious George....

Yes! Another ignorant racist comes out of the closet! We have lost more civil liberties in the past 7 years since they we're signed into law with the bill of rights. Gawd you freakin rightwinger's never cease to amaze and sicken me.

You deserve what is comming.

I learned how to read from Curious George. That little fella is adorable. Obviously you learned to write from "Dyslexic Danny." Curious George is a great character for kids, it is just a very unfortunate look for an adult.

-No racism here, just a statement of fact-Obama absolutely looks like the cute little children's book character.

-Did I ruffle your feathers because you look like Lunus? Settle down, sparky! We still love the special kids!

 

[PCL_128]

I might also add that POTUS "O" wants to raise capital gains taxes, which will make the growth of your 401(k) slow considerably.

Your 401(k) is shielded from capital gains taxes. An increased cap gains rate will not affect tax-shielded accounts. Since most middle-class Americans own their equities through tax-shielded accounts, a cap gains rate increase will not affect them.

 

[PCL_128]

You might need to watch Fox News and open up your eyes and ears.

That was a joke, right?

 

[flyinsick]

Obama is a joke. He has no experience to speak of yet the liberal news media throws softball questions at him and avoids the real issues. He is too afraid to even go on Sean Hannity.
I agree all three leave alot to be desired but he really scares me.
If he gets elected were gonna have the gays getting more rights than everyone else not to mention his views on life issues. Granted McCain might not be the best but to me moral issues are more important if this country is gonna survive.

Hillary had the stones to go on Bill Oriley, Someone who asks some real Questions. Not saying she is a good candidate.

 

[flyinsick]

Because there is no need to listen to Air America... many Americans know how to think independantly.

Many Americans don't need Sean, Rush and Bill to tell us what to think and believe....

Only Bill, Rush & Sean to bring out sometruths

 

[flyinsick]

Only Bill, Rush & Sean to bring out sometruths

I should have said they keep people accountable , Reps & Dems.

 

[atlcrjdriver]

I should have said they keep people accountable , Reps & Dems.

You're kidding, Right? Rush and Hannity are the true pompous arrogant wannabe elitists on the airway. I suppose its not there fault as, lately, that is the republican way isn't it. As your true leader Cheney once said, if you don't like what we do "so".

 

[Soverytired]

Your 401(k) is shielded from capital gains taxes. An increased cap gains rate will not affect tax-shielded accounts. Since most middle-class Americans own their equities through tax-shielded accounts, a cap gains rate increase will not affect them.

With all due respect: "No Duh" Your reply was an almost verbatim regurgitation of Obama himself when asked this question. The fact that reporters didn't pounce on the obvious shows that they're "in the tank" for him, ignorant about retirement savings, or both.

Your 401(k) will not pay capital gains taxes, or the bevy of new taxes on "evil" corporations that are sure to be a part of the next 4-8 years (or more) of democrat rule.

However, 401(k)s are mostly just tax sheltered stock accounts (crude but short summation, I know). Stock performances will be depressed as corporations post lesser profits under the weight of new taxes. "Windfall profits" are exactly what any stock holder (and 401k owner) needs to make their portfolio grow.

You're a smart guy. You know that the difference between a portfolio compounding at 9% a year vs. 5 % a year is HUGE.

This is not to say that new taxes on corporations might not be necessary. But don't kid yourself . . this WILL affect your retirement bottom line as well.

 

[Soverytired]

I never meant to list anything... however I'll give you the congressional agenda of ALPA.

Foreign Ownership
FFDO
Flight Time Duty Time
Collective bargaining
nmb appointments
etc..

Air Line Pilots are responsbile for the economy? What are you doing about these things? Voting for POTUS?

This suggest you are 24 years old. How old are you?
.

Pilots are not responsible for the economy.

Pilots who's sole reason for voting is to enact sweeping regulation should be able to define what they want more than "change" and "hope".

Remember . . . Regulation is just a polite way of saying compulsion at the end of a gun. Proceed with caution and try and think long and hard before you start taking away freedom.

So . . . as to your issues: I'm curious how a single one of them will do anything to either guarantee airline jobs or strengthen the underlying economics of the airline industry. This is not to say there aren't laws that could and should be enacted, but these are non-starters.

Suppose the laws changed tomorrow and:

• Every pilot was armed
• every union was able to strike with 15 minutes notice
• all foreign ownership was banned (as it is now),
• pilots were limited to 8 hour work days,
• every NMB mediator was elected by popular ALPA vote

Mission accomplished! You've "won"! How did any of this make your job more secure? If anything, the airlines just became a lot more expensive to operate. Is your job more secure, or less?

-I'm old enough to know that the airlines are in serious trouble and that fundamental changes are coming. I'm also old enough to understand that no job, anywhere, is secure. A large and constantly evolving skillset is the only way to continually thrive. This can be scary, but thank god we live in a country that abounds with freedom and opportunity.

I help the economy by being an asset to my employer and the workplace instead of a drain. I don't look for handouts and I take care of me and mine.

 

[PCL_128]

With all due respect: "No Duh" Your reply was an almost verbatim regurgitation of Obama himself when asked this question. The fact that reporters didn't pounce on the obvious shows that they're "in the tank" for him, ignorant about retirement savings, or both.

Your 401(k) will not pay capital gains taxes, or the bevy of new taxes on "evil" corporations that are sure to be a part of the next 4-8 years (or more) of democrat rule.

However, 401(k)s are mostly just tax sheltered stock accounts (crude but short summation, I know). Stock performances will be depressed as corporations post lesser profits under the weight of new taxes. "Windfall profits" are exactly what any stock holder (and 401k owner) needs to make their portfolio grow.

You're a smart guy. You know that the difference between a portfolio compounding at 9% a year vs. 5 % a year is HUGE.

This is not to say that new taxes on corporations might not be necessary. But don't kid yourself . . this WILL affect your retirement bottom line as well.

Agreed. Your previous post made it seem as though you were saying that your 401(k) itself was being taxed for cap gains. Just wanted to clarify.

I'm not a fan of corporate taxes. I think they're useless, as corporations will simply pass on the cost of the increased taxes to the consumer. If I had my way, corporate taxes would be completely eliminated. However, I love cap gains taxes. The rate needs to be jacked back up to where it was under the Clinton administration. Low cap gains taxes have allowed men like Warren Buffet to pay less in taxes as a percentage of total income than their secretaries who make $50k/yr. We should raise cap gains and dividend taxes, and shift to a more progressive income tax, shifting more of the tax burden onto the wealthy.

 

[Abernathy]

I agree.....

As a kid, I used to wonder why my Grandparents disliked Jimmy Carter so much.... After watching that idiot buddy-up with every anti-U.S. dictator in the whole freaking world, I have come to better understand their concerns. This Curious-George-looking freakshow makes Carter look ultra-conservative. There is no telling the damage he would do to our economic freedoms and civil liberties.

I would much rather risk the short-term damage to my career that you all seem to be so afraid of than risk losing whatever if left I value of this country. There is more at stake than what the govt. can do to protect your career.

Personally, I would rather pay for my own healthcare than pay 86% taxes and get it for "free."

There's a sucker born every minute.....

 

[Smarta$$]

To what end.... how much of a degredation are you willing to take? Will you have life, liberty and happiness if you can't afford a house, have no money for your 401k, can't afford to eat out and no prosperity.

There are too many pilots that are already living this way... and more to come...

One issue democrates and trade unionism.... that should be the first issue: which is my house, my family and my future. After those are resolved we can talk about gays, guns and abortion.


pilot comes home: Honey, great news, we won the abortion legislation. It becomes law tonight...

Wife: the bank called, we are three payments behind. They are going to foreclose!

Pilot: did you hear me!

Wife: Did you hear me?

The problem is pilots, vote issues other than their profession. They will put social issues, like gays, guns and abortion before their house payment, retirement, work rules, etc...

Very, Very, Very well said. I don't know why people don't understand this.

 

[PCL_128]

Very, Very, Very well said. I don't know why people don't understand this.

It took me a long, long time to come around. I held on to the RALP (Republican air line pilot) mentality with a death grip, but I finally came to my senses. Thankfully, Rez didn't give up on trying to convince me.

 

[Smarta$$]

Agreed. Your previous post made it seem as though you were saying that your 401(k) itself was being taxed for cap gains. Just wanted to clarify.

I'm not a fan of corporate taxes. I think they're useless, as corporations will simply pass on the cost of the increased taxes to the consumer. If I had my way, corporate taxes would be completely eliminated. However, I love cap gains taxes. The rate needs to be jacked back up to where it was under the Clinton administration. Low cap gains taxes have allowed men like Warren Buffet to pay less in taxes as a percentage of total income than their secretaries who make $50k/yr. We should raise cap gains and dividend taxes, and shift to a more progressive income tax, shifting more of the tax burden onto the wealthy.

Just my opinion, but there is no guarantee that a corporate tax cut would trickle down to the consumer or employees. It is more likely that it would be paid out in large part to executives and investors.

 

[PCL_128]

Just my opinion, but there is no guarantee that a corporate tax cut would trickle down to the consumer or employees. It is more likely that it would be paid out in large part to executives and investors.

Oh, no disagreement there. My main point is that increasing corporate taxes will only result in the cost being passed on to the consumer. Anyone that thinks they can "stick it to the execs" by increasing corp taxes is barking up the wrong tree. Best thing to do is increase cap gains, dividends, and upper marginal income rate taxes.

 

[Smarta$$]

agreed.

 

[Soverytired]

Agreed. Your previous post made it seem as though you were saying that your 401(k) itself was being taxed for cap gains. Just wanted to clarify.

I'm not a fan of corporate taxes. I think they're useless, as corporations will simply pass on the cost of the increased taxes to the consumer. If I had my way, corporate taxes would be completely eliminated. However, I love cap gains taxes. The rate needs to be jacked back up to where it was under the Clinton administration. Low cap gains taxes have allowed men like Warren Buffet to pay less in taxes as a percentage of total income than their secretaries who make $50k/yr. We should raise cap gains and dividend taxes, and shift to a more progressive income tax, shifting more of the tax burden onto the wealthy.

Mostly agree.

Warren Buffet is a jackass. He's constantly talking about how guys like him need to pay more taxes . . .then proceeds to lock all his personal assets up in foundations that are tax-free protected.

 

[PCL_128]

Mostly agree.

Warren Buffet is a jackass. He's constantly talking about how guys like him need to pay more taxes . . .then proceeds to lock all his personal assets up in foundations that are tax-free protected.

Warren Buffet is a jackass? The biggest charitable contributor in history? Sorry, beg to differ. Buffet plays by the rules. If you design a system that benefits the rich guy by allowing him to shelter his money from taxes, then he's going to use it to his benefit. Don't blame Buffet for a system that favors the wealthy, especially since he's a vocal opponent of said system.

 

[Soverytired]

Very, Very, Very well said. I don't know why people don't understand this.

I don't disagree with pilots voting for any party or platform.

I don't have a problem with pilots voting primarily because of a candidates' stance on unions.

However, I'm very hard pressed to find anyone here who can cite a single union issue that is being pursued that will strengthen the airline economy as a whole. The silence here is deafening when one asks what ALPA is even pursing in terms of regulatory actions . . . few seem to even know the obvious ones; blind faith is for children and zealots.

Ultimately it comes down to this: ALPA and unions are nice, and important and necessary. However, having airlines actually stay in business is even more important (job security, right?). There are dozens of possible aids to airlines the government can encourage/force, but no candidate, party, or union is discussing them.

If you believe that encouraging strong airline heath is a more legitimate voting criteria than blind faith and support in unions, then you might understand pilots backing parties or candidates on things other than "labor politics."

Pro-labor, pro-business . . . either way, I'd like to hear exactly what laws and government actions should take place in order to save airlines. What candidate or party is proposing them? What union is discussing them?

 

[Soverytired]

Warren Buffet is a jackass? The biggest charitable contributor in history? Sorry, beg to differ. Buffet plays by the rules. If you design a system that benefits the rich guy by allowing him to shelter his money from taxes, then he's going to use it to his benefit. Don't blame Buffet for a system that favors the wealthy, especially since he's a vocal opponent of said system.

Perhaps hypocrite is a bit strong then? To use the law to your advantage is certainly what a smart person does.

To advocate higher taxes then put your money in untouchable trust funds (even though I agree that his affiliation with the Gates Foundation and their goals and methods are mostly above reproach) is a bit two-faced. In fact, the last time I checked all the money that went into that foundation was conditional based on it remaining in a tax-free status.

"Do as I say, not as I do" isn't a great way to inspire sweeping policy change.

 

[PCL_128]

Soverytired, you must have missed that Congressman Oberstar and Senator Rockefeller have been talking of holding hearings specifically to address possible re-regulation of the airline industry. Do you think they dreamed this up on their own? ALPA works behind the scenes. When you see a lawmaker make a statement in defense of our profession, it's a good bet that ALPA was behind the scenes talking to him first. When you see a reporter grill an airline exec, most likely ALPA "helped" that reporter with some research for those questions. When hearings are suggested on things like airline safety and re-regulation, you can bet that ALPA had a hand in it.

 

[PCL_128]

Perhaps hypocrite is a bit strong then? To use the law to your advantage is certainly what a smart person does.

To advocate higher taxes then put your money in untouchable trust funds (even though I agree that his affiliation with the Gates Foundation and their goals and methods are mostly above reproach) is a bit two-faced. In fact, the last time I checked all the money that went into that foundation was conditional based on it remaining in a tax-free status.

"Do as I say, not as I do" isn't a great way to inspire sweeping policy change.

I don't really see any hypocrisy in what he's doing. He's not going to single-handily save the world by not sheltering his own wealth from taxes. The entire system needs to change, and he's trying to get it changed. Until it is changed, I see nothing wrong with him working the current system. He didn't become the second richest man in the world, allowing himself to be the biggest charitable contributor in the world, by not being smart with how he shelters his money. He wants a system that is fair across the board. He doesn't want to try to be a one-man army that only contributes his own billions to the federal coffers.

 

[Smarta$$]

I don't disagree with pilots voting for any party or platform.

I don't have a problem with pilots voting primarily because of a candidates' stance on unions.

However, I'm very hard pressed to find anyone here who can cite a single union issue that is being pursued that will strengthen the airline economy as a whole. The silence here is deafening when one asks what ALPA is even pursing in terms of regulatory actions . . . few seem to even know the obvious ones; blind faith is for children and zealots.

Ultimately it comes down to this: ALPA and unions are nice, and important and necessary. However, having airlines actually stay in business is even more important (job security, right?). There are dozens of possible aids to airlines the government can encourage/force, but no candidate, party, or union is discussing them.

If you believe that encouraging strong airline heath is a more legitimate voting criteria than blind faith and support in unions, then you might understand pilots backing parties or candidates on things other than "labor politics."

Pro-labor, pro-business . . . either way, I'd like to hear exactly what laws and government actions should take place in order to save airlines. What candidate or party is proposing them? What union is discussing them?

We are only having this discussion about airline survival now that fuel prices are at out of control prices. However, during all the times that the airlines were making money or paying HUGE bonuses to executives, the employees were left with pay cuts. Because they had an administration that gave all the leverage to the executives and took leverage from employees.

Labor friendly administrations can't force airlines to be profitable (unless regulated), but they can give us a seat at the table during the good times and help us not suffer so dramatically in the bad times.

The difference is who will benefit in good times. I am ready for my turn, my CEO has had his.

 

[Rez O. Lewshun]

We are only having this discussion about airline survival now that fuel prices are at out of control prices. However, during all the times that the airlines were making money or paying HUGE bonuses to executives, the employees were left with pay cuts. Because they had an administration that gave all the leverage to the executives and took leverage from employees.

Labor friendly administrations can't force airlines to be profitable (unless regulated), but they can give us a seat at the table during the good times and help us not suffer so dramatically in the bad times.

The difference is who will benefit in good times. I am ready for my turn, my CEO has had his.

It is all about being represented...

The current laws, policy and culture in this country favor corporate America. The intent is to have your voice heard. Is that unamerican? Give those who have all the power and wealth....more just seems unreasonable...

Fuel prices out of control..... who should pay for it? Your CEO thinks pilots and the rest of labor should. Why should he work harder at being a CEO when he can use fear and force pilots to give up their pay...when it won't matter... the point....

The laws, policies and culture in our country help and allow him to do so.....

I want representation in Congress and from POTUS that doesn't allow my CEO to do so....

 

[Soverytired]

If your position is that the entire airline industry needs massive federal subsidizes and re-regulation, then I agree . .the Dems are probably the party most likely to favor this route.

I personally think this would lead to very high prices for the consumer, a loss of between 1/3 and 1/2 of all pilot jobs, and the elimination and/or shrinkage of quite a few carriers. However, for those lucky pilots who are "in" and survive the shakeout, it would probably lead to greater job security.

That said, two elected officials offhandedly mentioning maybe having hearings in the sometime-future to totally upset the apple cart by massive federal intervention in the private market isn't something I'd hang my vote on. For me, there are more important issues and certainly much better ways to deal with the airline economy that are both far less intrusive and much cheaper for the taxpayer and the flying public.

Nor am I impressed with the "ALPA behind the scenes" train of thought. This means they can claim credit for everything . . . while never being held accountable for anything. ALPA has an official regulatory agenda, and that is what they must be judged on. Their record of accomplishments in the past decade has been less than impressive (duty time, lost on the age 65 rule, etc.) I know it's been a tough environment for them, but they should be judged on results, not empty promises.

However . . . if your #1 voting criteria is airline re-regulation to "save" the airlines, then I agree you're choosing the correct party.

Soverytired, you must have missed that Congressman Oberstar and Senator Rockefeller have been talking of holding hearings specifically to address possible re-regulation of the airline industry. Do you think they dreamed this up on their own? ALPA works behind the scenes. When you see a lawmaker make a statement in defense of our profession, it's a good bet that ALPA was behind the scenes talking to him first. When you see a reporter grill an airline exec, most likely ALPA "helped" that reporter with some research for those questions. When hearings are suggested on things like airline safety and re-regulation, you can bet that ALPA had a hand in it.