Soverytired
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2006
- Posts
- 1,572
If Obama is weak, McCain is (understandably) unstable.
I really don't see, btw, how Obama is "weak." Is it because he uses real words and speaks coherently, instead of using phrases like "bring it on" and "git'er done"?
Does Obama use too many big words? Is it because he's not a "regular guy" like the rest of us? As if that's a bad thing?
Come man, tell. But cut the crap and tell us. Going off on his Pastor and people he met 20 years ago shows just how desperate you people are you find something to stick to the guy.
Ah. The stereotypical Obamican. I won't bore you with policy discussions . . it's unlikely you know anything of substance anyway.
1. John McCain, last year's "reasonable" Republican to the democratic party, is now "unstable." Or "confused". Or "senile". This used to be considered "agism" . . .unless you're Obama.
2. Obama uses "big words", and that threatens the dummies (re: anyone who disagrees with him). He's not a "regular guy" . . .he's BETTER than a regular guy ("this is a good thing"). This is normally called "elitism" . . . except when it's Obama.
3. "Bring it on" . . . how odd. I thought this was a Bush-ism, not McCain. Bush isn't running this time, but an Obamican can't seem to get past this. Even though McCain was the cat's meow to democrats for repeatedly pissing in the Republicans punch, now he IS Bush.
4. Regularly frequenting a racist's church for 20 years, writing books discussing how profoundly it's pastor shaped his life, and defending that pastor repeatedly (until throwing him under the bus) is AOK . . . if you're Obama.
=====================================
I digress. Obama is weak not because he's unable to sway a fickle mob that thinks the president is the king of America . . . clearly he can . . . just as Bush was able to do twice.
He's weak because he has no demonstrated ability to lead leaders. He has passed no significant legislation in his very brief years as a state and federal official, he has not been a leader in his own party, and he has not demonstrated any ability to find common ground with the other half of America -- the republican party. His judgment on picking subordinates is questionable, and he's already had to fire several of them from his campaign; the same can be said with the people he's associated with for decades.
He can win. He WILL win. But can he govern? If he's unable to win a fair amount of DUAL party support, his results will be lackluster. Personally, I think he's going to be extremely divisive (51% to 49%) and will be unable to deliver on much of what he's promised (thank god).
Last edited: