Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Maybe a reson to vote Dem.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Getting Oil Prices Lower!!

Just curious...how would a Rep. bring oil down?

Show your work...

Ever heard of EXPLORATION,DRILLING,building REFINERIES??Either we do this OR everyone is going to keep right on PAYING MORE!!!
Begging the ARABS for more oil will not work either!!!!

This HAS to be done inorder to KEEP YOU and THOUSANDS of PILOTS EMPLOYED!!!!
 
Last edited:
Ever heard of EXPLORATION,DRILLING,building REFINERIES??Either we do this OR everyone is going to keep right on PAYING MORE!!!
Begging the ARABS for more oil will not work either!!!!

This HAS to be done inorder to KEEP YOU and THOUSANDS of PILOTS EMPLOYED!!!!

Oil prices are responding to the exploding demand being generated in China and India. Drilling more won't fix it; we need to get truly "energy independent" and start figuring out how to meet that demand (which will continue to grow exponentially) profitably by innovating new (clean) energy solutions. That should make any true capitalist smile.
 
Oil prices are responding to the exploding demand being generated in China and India. Drilling more won't fix it; we need to get truly "energy independent" and start figuring out how to meet that demand (which will continue to grow exponentially) profitably by innovating new (clean) energy solutions. That should make any true capitalist smile.

The U.S. has known for decades that at least 8.5 billion proven barrels of oil sit off its Pacific, Atlantic and Gulf coasts, with the Interior Department estimating 86 billion barrels of undiscovered oil resources.

Yeah, let's get to hugging those trees and have a sit in to discuss the merits of caribou in Alaska and ignore the BILLIONS of barrels just off our coastline.
 
I don't have a problem with developing new energy technology. I think it should be funded by investors who want to take a risk and reap the possible rewards. I don't want the government spending my money on things like ethanol, which is looking less and less viable every day. Even the newspapers that normally drink the ethanol kool-aide are starting to second guess it.
 
Oil prices are responding to the exploding demand being generated in China and India. Drilling more won't fix it; we need to get truly "energy independent" and start figuring out how to meet that demand (which will continue to grow exponentially) profitably by innovating new (clean) energy solutions. That should make any true capitalist smile.


That should help things out...in about 2 decades.
 
What about a viable libertarian candidate? I know it is probably too late for it to make a difference this time around but we should really be looking into this down the road.
 
What about a viable libertarian candidate? I know it is probably too late for it to make a difference this time around but we should really be looking into this down the road.

You've already got one. Bob Barr, former Republican Congressman from GA. Probably the best candidate the Libertarian party has ever had. He's anticipating being on the ballot in 48 states. I encourage all would-be McCain voters to consider Barr instead. :)
 
You've already got one. Bob Barr, former Republican Congressman from GA. Probably the best candidate the Libertarian party has ever had. He's anticipating being on the ballot in 48 states. I encourage all would-be McCain voters to consider Barr instead. :)

Yes....ahem....I would also encourage all would-be McCain voters to vote for Barr. Ahem.
 
You've already got one. Bob Barr, former Republican Congressman from GA. Probably the best candidate the Libertarian party has ever had. He's anticipating being on the ballot in 48 states. I encourage all would-be McCain voters to consider Barr instead. :)
Problem with that is, that just enough votes would be deflected and we'd get stuck with Obama (Jimmy Carter, part II).
 
Problem with that is, that just enough votes would be deflected and we'd get stuck with Obama

That's exactly what I'm hoping. :)
 
That's exactly what I'm hoping. :)
I can't stand behind Obama for life issues. Besides that, he talks too much about what's wrong but has not offered a word on what he would do to fix it all. Seems the easy way to run for office is to just point at everyone else and dodge the issues.
I think I may run next time!
 
Besides that, he talks too much about what's wrong but has not offered a word on what he would do to fix it all.

If you just go to his website, you'll see that he has extremely detailed policy proposals on every subject imaginable.
 
If you just go to his website, you'll see that he has extremely detailed policy proposals on every subject imaginable.

This is true.

But talk is cheap.

His legislative record (and lack thereof) and inability to reach across the aisle on anything speak volumes.

Do you see Obama standing up to some of the major scumbags in his own party?

Sources say: "No."
 
This is true.

But talk is cheap.

His legislative record (and lack thereof) and inability to reach across the aisle on anything speak volumes.

Do you see Obama standing up to some of the major scumbags in his own party?

Sources say: "No."
This can't be repeated enough. I agree with alot of what Obama says. But the guy has no balls and has PROVEN he has a tough time making decisions.

Put him in office and it we'd be begging for business as usual.

Unfortunately, put McCain in office and it will be business as usual.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom