Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Luthi as leader

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
George W was not part of Fast and Furious. That is an untrue statement.

What is Obama hiding? Give congress the documents.
 
George W was not part of Fast and Furious. That is an untrue statement.

What is Obama hiding? Give congress the documents.

..."And although the original gunwalking started under the Bush Administration, it’s Obama and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder who are under fire, especially from right-leaning press outlets, including Fox News, who are championing justice for Terry and demanding answers about his death from the Obama administration, since Fast and Furious flamed out on this administration’s watch. Congress, too, has jumped into the fray, with House Republicans accusing Holder of stonewalling their investigation into the operation that killed Terry and recommending Holder be held in contempt of Congress under the leadership of Rep. Darrel Issa (D-Calif.)."...



http://current.com/shows/the-war-ro...-privilege-and-contempt-of-congress-explained
 
Gun walking, yes. Fast and furious, no. Look up the differences in the programs and educate yourself.
 
Gret

I bet you hate it when the facts get in the way.


"Under George W Bush the federal government was involved in a gun tracking effort called Operation Wide Receiver. Are there some similarities between Fast and Furious and Wide Receiver? Yes, but there are a couple of differences and they are big ones.

First and foremost, the guns sold under Wide Receiver actually had tracking devices on them whereas the weapons sold during Fast and Furious did not. The Bush administration was looking to trace the guns and interdict them whereas the Obama regime was purposely letting the guns walk into Mexico to prove the 90% lie. And second; despite Jay Carney’s claim that it was Eric Holder who halted this program, Operation Wide Receiver was stopped by the Bush administration once it was learned some of the weapons were lost.

Operation Wide Receiver and Operation Fast and Furious were two separate programs despite Eric Holder’s attempt to combine the two in order to drag George W Bush into the scandal."
 
Gret

I bet you hate it when the facts get in the way.


"Under George W Bush the federal government was involved in a gun tracking effort called Operation Wide Receiver. Are there some similarities between Fast and Furious and Wide Receiver? Yes, but there are a couple of differences and they are big ones.

First and foremost, the guns sold under Wide Receiver actually had tracking devices on them whereas the weapons sold during Fast and Furious did not. The Bush administration was looking to trace the guns and interdict them whereas the Obama regime was purposely letting the guns walk into Mexico to prove the 90% lie. And second; despite Jay Carney’s claim that it was Eric Holder who halted this program, Operation Wide Receiver was stopped by the Bush administration once it was learned some of the weapons were lost.

Operation Wide Receiver and Operation Fast and Furious were two separate programs despite Eric Holder’s attempt to combine the two in order to drag George W Bush into the scandal."

You must have me confused with someone else.

I know there is a difference and said so quite a few posts ago. They stopped the arrangement in 2007 when the Mexican government didn't arrest the guys we identified.
 
If you vote for Obama you deserve to get your butt kicked.

Not voting for Obama...never...but I'm getting ticked off with the Mittster because he and his staff are getting too cute with evading questions. Clear and understandable positions on issues is imperative. I may not agree with every answer, but I believe you need this in deciding who to vote for. Really disappointed in Mitt for not manning up! I expect this from Congress...not the guy who wants to lead the country.
 
hey gret ,you don't have to explain yourself to anybody,especially on this forum,everybody is such a tough guy behind a keyboard,and you are right,the mittster is not your friend.
 
And the current administration is? As usual, it comes down to the lesser of two weevils. (Sorry Captain Aubrey, I could not stop myself.) For me, it is not hard to choose.
Helm
 
Last edited:
Seems to me these two are not that far apart politically. Their respective records on the healthcare issue are an example.

We should should consider which special interests each one will be beholden to if elected when making our choice in November.

I'm very disappointed in Obama's failure to deliver on much of what he promised those of us who make up his base in the first term. But Mittens has so utterly sold himself out to the far-right and on top of that done it in such a transparent/disingenuous way that I have trouble with anything else he says.

Guess I'm on board with the Capt. Aubrey annalysis on this one.
 
You'd think that people posting in the Fractional forum would put "making businesses successful again" far ahead of any other issue in the headlines today.
 
You'd think that people posting in the Fractional forum would put "making businesses successful again" far ahead of any other issue in the headlines today.

Business will become successful again when there are people to buy their products. Almost all of those products are purchased by the middle class. When the middle class wins, everyone wins. Bring back the 50's minus the racism.
 
When businesses can sell their products and services for less due to not being bogged down by the government, then they will have more customers.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top