Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Low-fare revolution could topple major airlines

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
check your info

Check your history.....

When Virgin came along, they were both inventive and low cost. Their coach class product was significantly less in price than BA at that time. While I have not checked lately, I have no reason to think that they are doing things differently today.


Their first class product was tremendous, check the price verus BA.
 
Meanwhile their service level has declined to where it is no better than Southwest or AirTran

That has to be one of the most idiodic statements I have ever read on this board.
 
Indapool said:
That has to be one of the most idiodic statements I have ever read on this board.



Go sit in coach in Delta, AirTran, Jet Blue, NWA and UAL, and you tell me what the difference is. Make sure to try the center row seats in the B757 and 767. Also, make sure to sample the RJ product, since they are covering more and more of the routes.

Then go look in the mirror and tell us who the idiot is.
 
Last edited:
I have to agree wit Ty. Go sit in a DAL B737, I'm 5-7, and my knees were bumping the seat in front of me, that airplane's seat pitch was the worst domestic seat pitch I've seen - even SWA is better pitchwise. At least I was in an aisle. I was jumpseating CVGORD trying like heck to get home one night and the flightdeck jumpseat in a 737 would've been more comfortable.

At least UAL has (had) the Premium Economy Zone - the front x rows in coach with the expanded legroom.

Plus, when it comes to service level, its all about perceptions to the self-loading freight. When they pay 250 bucks for a 30 minute flight on one of the "full-service" majors, they expect a certain service level - and on a 30 minute flight on a full-service major you wont get squat. On SWA, with their "mosh-pit" boarding, unassigned seating, somewhat lower fares, their perceived service expectation is lower, and when someone flies them, and gets whether its the snack box, cookies, peanuts, or whatever, even on a 30 minute flight, they are perceived to have met their service expectation.
 
Service Level

I would prefer jetBlue to any carrier mentioned to travel on.

For years and years I was a dedicated Delta customer (100k a year). Other than assigned seating, as far as I am concerned, everything but jetblue has become pretty much the same. Frankly, I have not found SWA non assigned seating to be much of a problem.
 
hehe..
Apparently too much cough syrup today..disregard
 
Last edited:
Home suffering from a cold myself. If this medicine doesn't work soon, I may be forced to treat this thing with scotch . . . .
 
Last edited:
I have been at AIRTRAN almost 2 years. I really like it and enjoy flying the B-717. Having spent 12 years at Piedmont flying the Dash-8, this is the best move for me. If you dont care for or dont want to work for LCC thats ok. Wait a few years for majors to hire. Ill be a Captain making 6 figures. As will other pilots who saw that AIRTRAN is a fine place to be. Im sure if you ask the over 750 pilots at AIRTRAN, we have a nice contract with good work rules and a company making money and taking 717s each month!! I think Ill stay!!!
 
"Airlines like People Express are the future of aviation."
-- Wall Street experts ca: 1983

"Airlines like Valujet are the darlings of Wall Street. In a few years all major airlines will have to adjust."
-- Wall Street experts ca: 1995

"In a few years there will only be three major airlines. The marketplace will see massive consolidation."
-- Wall Street experts ca: 1998

This is the most unpredictable of industries. To suggest that network carriers are obsolete is truly reckless.
 
Actually, the guy who started this thread either copied it from someplace or is wasting his talents flying airplanes. That was well done, albeit a bit chest-thumping.

While I don't begrudge anyone's success, many posters before this response have said it far more eloquently than I. Remember, it's really fun when you're growing up, but sometime, the reality of being grown up and it's inherent problems begin to set in. Even though SWA has been around for a relatively long time, it hasn't been around for a relatively long time, either. At some time, the juggernaut will plateau and the same old human and business realities will be there too. To reject this prediction is to deny history. To believe "it won't happen to me/us is akin to my teenagers absolutely convinced that they'll live forever and are somehow immune to the pitfalls of living.

It's a great airline and business model, but it's not the be-all and end-all of aviation. Think I'm wrong? Time will tell.

Be well.

UAL78
 
Darnearajet

Actually I think most of those things were pretty right on. Peoples Express lost it's way by getting off the path of its model.

Valujet is Airtran and the concept was successful.

Crandall said 5 to survive til 1995. He was not far off and there may be 3 soon the way things are going

Sounds right to me
 
I think the majors will have to adapt to the new LCC model, but not entirely. That is why Delta is trying to do something about it. They are trying to get a piece of the Low Cost segment. Not everyone wants to fly on a low cost carrier, but with today's economy more and more are doing so. But, things change and the Economy will eventually get better. Yes, Delta spent big bucks with McKensie Consulting to find an answer, and everyone is slamming it, without even seeing it. Other airlines, like Air Canada which is making profits again, have LCC inside their umbrella. Here is what Delta has going for it:
1. 550 mainline planes (ok, 15 less---minus MD11's)
2. $5 billion in unencumbered assets
3. A strong Hub structure---ATL, CVG, DFW, SLC, NYC
4. A strong Intl presence-----Europe, South America
5. Member of Skyteam---also Air France, Korean, Aero
Mexico, Czech----good feed opportunity
6. A future LCC--Fresh Air(?)---to compete with Airtran,
Southwest, Jetblue---to try to get a piece of pie
7. RJ's----Lots of them---upto 1000 eventually--good for
Hub feed---pax from smaller cities pay more $$
8. Possible Codeshare with NW/CO---huge benefits
9. Strong leaders---Leo---good with Congress, Fred Reid
was head of Lufthansa---knows business
10. Delta Shuttle in NYC---had 737-800's, now 737-300's
will make more $ with smaller planes
11. Less unions than other Majors, helps us pilots also

Those are some of the things going for Delta. Yes, the pilots have really high pay, and maybe that will come down, especially for the LCC. I think Air Tran, Southwest, and Jetblue do very well at what they do, which is low fare. Delta Express had its chance, and it only really broke even. Now, the LCC will try 757's with 80 more seats, less flight attendants, more entertainment, faster turn times---50mins, more flying throughout the day---13.2 hrs, and have a frequent flyer program that beats everyone elses, with more choices of destinations than Airtran, Southwest, and Jetblue. Advertising on the new LCC will be huge (on the backs of the furloughed employees no doubt), and that will attract attention. Then, we'll see what happens. Don't count Delta out until we see what happens. I really do think Southwest, Airtran, and Jetblue do a good job, but we'll try to do it too, that is a fact.

Bye Bye-----General Lee:rolleyes:
 
UAL78 said:
Actually, the guy who started this thread either copied it from someplace or is wasting his talents flying airplanes. That was well done, albeit a bit chest-thumping.

While I don't begrudge anyone's success, many posters before this response have said it far more eloquently than I. Remember, it's really fun when you're growing up, but sometime, the reality of being grown up and it's inherent problems begin to set in. Even though SWA has been around for a relatively long time, it hasn't been around for a relatively long time, either. At some time, the juggernaut will plateau and the same old human and business realities will be there too. To reject this prediction is to deny history. To believe "it won't happen to me/us is akin to my teenagers absolutely convinced that they'll live forever and are somehow immune to the pitfalls of living.

It's a great airline and business model, but it's not the be-all and end-all of aviation. Think I'm wrong? Time will tell.

Be well.

UAL78

Very prophetic post. My wife and I are friends with a married Southwest couple. We talk about the differences a lot. We also all seem to agree that there seems to be a life cycle of the airline. While some are in their mature or declining phases, others are in their growth. Southwest is no different than UAL, DAL, AMR--just behind their life cycles by about 20-30 years.
 
low cost carriers.. the end all?

First, everyone should read the article which started all these good views..it's in aviation week... at www.aviationnow.com... my key points

1) the huge amount of borrowing the majors have done in this low revenue environment will stifle and be a huge ball and chain even when the economy picks up steam...latest figure according to article...90%of debt for every for every dollar of market cap.

2) the guy's article is drawn on trends and shows a weakening of market share by the majors (big 6) from 75% to 45% in 10 or 15 years. This doesn't take into account all of the variables...it's reallly subject to alot of scrutiny.

It's akin to the problems of detroit in the 70's and 80's...when japan started kickin our ass they got their act together...i wont even attempt to define how they do it.. they get paid the big bucks...

3) SWA will have to deal with the following problems which have already started....recent 20% rise in labor costs.... shrinking earnings picture... As a company grows to certain revenue levels...it becomes harder and harder to enjow the same economies of scale which brought it there... i'm just the messenger, but call any analyst and then watch their performance over the next three years.

4) the laws of supply and demand didn't get written yesterday. they'll work in the airline, tobacco, auto, etc., etc.,
 
Guys and Gals, fellow professionals:

The future is so clear. I wish some of you would snap into reality and realize it's right in front of you.

Simple. All majors (other than SWA,JB etc.) will have 50,70-seat RJs flying all domestic flights 3 hours or less.

Those same majors will have retired all short haul B727s,B737s,DC9s, MD80,F100s etc. The smallest aircraft would be 757s (maybe 737-800s too) and wide bodies. These aircraft would ONLY fly coast-to-coast or Int'l. It's inevitable, don't fight it.

ALL THE SCOPE CLAUSES IN THE WORLD AIN'T GONNA STOP IT!

So to qoute Cher, "Snap out of it"

Happy flying!
 
In times of economic distress, the low cost carriers do much better than the full-service airlines. When the economic turn-around comes, the industry will return pretty much back to where it was before. Maybe the trailer court crowd wants to travel greyhound style (although I think greyhound at least assigns seats), but a lot of people don't.

As an academic question, I wonder if the long term economic impacts on individual airlines would have been different if it had been LCC airplanes that had been used by the the islamic suicide mass murders instead of UAL and AA aircraft.
 
Last edited:
beytzim said:
Guys and Gals, fellow professionals:

...
So to qoute Cher, "Snap out of it"



Quoting CHER??!!!


Are you a woman or some kinda sweater wearing homo?

Sorry, just couldn't resist a cheap laugh at your expense.

Cheers
 
TO: JAYDUB

I Think if I see one more JB capt' on here with 3000+ hrs. I'm going to puke,and it had to be less than that when you got hired,I guess thats how they get away with sub par wages.
 
Intruder One

Intruder One,

Your assumptions are incorrect. You must have come to know about jetBlue in the last year, otherwise you'd know the original requirement was all applicants had to have over 3000TT. My feeling is, I met the original requirements, so other than that what does any member on this board need to know about me. It cracks me up when members of this forum update their profile after every flight so you can get an exact number of their flight hours.



I Think if I see one more JB capt' on here with 3000+ hrs.

So, you want people to be Captains with less than 3000 hours total time???? I think I know what you are implying with your statement, but their is an old truism about what happens when you assume. Most of the people you see posting on this forum that work for jetBlue are atleast as qualified as those getting hired at DAL, UAL, etc. 2-3 years ago.

I guess thats how they get away with sub par wages.

I am in my second year of employment. With that said, I'll put what I make against what any second year pilot makes at any major airline. Our work rules make it so we get time and a half for anything over monthly guarantee. That means we get rewarded for being productive. Who knows about the future holds, we might make more but we certainly won't make less, unlike other airlines.

I wish you the best Intruder One. Let me know if you have any more questions.


JayDub
 

Latest resources

Back
Top