GogglesPisano
Pawn, in game of life
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2003
- Posts
- 3,939
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GogglesPisano said:Doesn't the APA have a scope clause? All they have to say is no friggin' way. The Eagle MEC should be ashamed. "Please let us fly bigger airplanes! We'll do it for cheap. Please?" Pathetic!!!
I am an RJ Driver and a strong believer in SCOPE!
There was a 4 party agreement between AE,AA, and both management groups that set rules for all flowthrough and flowback procedures. This year APA decided that contract was not in their best interest anymore
I'm glad the Eagle MEC is making the AAer's sweat. I don't think we'll get the new equipment but at least AMRon will use our offer to squeeze even more concessions out of APA. Call it karma for screwing with Eagle.
Enjoy your careeer at Eagle as you will never wind up at AA (hopefully).
If those backstabbers have their way,
I hope you will be able to sleep at night if these actions come to fruition and furloughed AA guys like myself never get recalled.
I see you now have 5500hrs...what did you have 9-11-01? Probably around 3500hr. I got news for ya buddy...that wasn't competitive prior to that date. It's not that the major carriers didn't want you, there were just too many BETTER QUALIFIED candidates y
screw the mudslinging I want to know how it was amended. What was it before, what is it now, and if so how can it be totally disregarded?How about all the 5+ year Eagle FO's that will never upgrade due to APA and AE management implementing their own flowback agreement
Is that really what you want??? You would be opening a can of worms that would end up taking what professionalism is left at your present job... Pic up aviation weekly... there are thousand of people who reponded to an article saying they would be willing to fly a 767 for the rest of their life for pennies on our dollar.if AMR managment will take the time to engage both pilot unions and allow aircraft in these seat ranges to be flown unrestricted by which-ever pilot group can do so in the most cost efficient manner.
WyoHerkdriver said:It is pretty obvious what the point of the letter is. Eagle pilots want to steal mainline AA flying. Isn't the intent of the letter pretty clear? Seriously, why don't the Eagle guys go for it all and put it a bid in to fly the 777 for AA at "slave wages". What a lame and pathetic attempt by those at Eagle. I hope you are proud of your MEC.
WyoHerkdriver said:First, the greedy Eagle pukes show their willingness to fly the 100 seat regional jets for AA and the next thing you know they will be offering to fly the 777 for a third of what the mainline guys earn. What a pathetic attempt to steal from others.
I have beeen furloughed from AA for a year and a half now, and if I never get recalled, at least I can say I fulfilled my dream by flying for a major airline. Thanks to the greedy actions of the Eagle MEC, I may never fly again at AA. If those backstabbers have their way, they will be flying aircraft that clearly should be flown by mainline pilots. I hope you will be able to sleep at night if these actions come to fruition and furloughed AA guys like myself never get recalled. Enjoy your careeer at Eagle as you will never wind up at AA (hopefully).
canadflyau said:Please explain.. What was the original flowback deal? and what is currently happening?
and you call yourself "FightTheFuture"? That statement is just plain immature..
canadflyau said:Not only that.... but would you have even had 1000hrs of PIC at a 121 or 135 carrier by 9/11????
canadflyau said:Why won't anyone please explain statements like this...
screw the mudslinging I want to know how it was amended. What was it before, what is it now, and if so how can it be totally disregarded?
canadflyau said:Is that really what you want??? You would be opening a can of worms that would end up taking what professionalism is left at your present job... Pic up aviation weekly... there are thousand of people who reponded to an article saying they would be willing to fly a 767 for the rest of their life for pennies on our dollar.
I just can't belive what I am reading... If 100 seat jets find there way out of mainline I will be considering other career options.
I still call BS on that guy... 1000 pic in the 121or135 envrionment as a min is commonplace at the majors unless you had an inside track like a internship or dating the CP's daughter.Who wanted 1000 pic? At a 135 carrier? I know people at UAL and AA without 1000 pic.
So in its original context it was a one way street... they could only flowback as many as had flowed through... Wouldn't that mean that basically the pilots flowing back were Eagle pilots that flowed through and whoever else comprised the bottom 450 pilots who accepted to flowback instead of furlough? How many have flowed back?The AA pilots who elected to make use of their right to flowback would displace Eagle captains who agreed at the time of completion of their IOE on the RJ chose themselves to flowthrough to AA. The number of displacements that would have been possible I
I couldn't agree with you more.. If you guys voted in the APA and out with ALPA do you think you could end the whipsaw and create a whole paradigm of problems even if the APA's true intent for Eagle pilots wasn't honerable...? That would be a big step toward one list in my opinion.a fusion of the list would grant APA more power as a single pilot group would be in control of all flying under the AMR unbrella
canadflyau said:I still call BS on that guy... 1000 pic in the 121or135 envrionment as a min is commonplace at the majors unless you had an inside track like a internship or dating the CP's daughter
canadflyau said:Ok, more questions about the revised flowthough... So in its original context it was a one way street... they could only flowback as many as had flowed through... Wouldn't that mean that basically the pilots flowing back were Eagle pilots that flowed through and whoever else comprised the bottom 450 pilots who accepted to flowback instead of furlough? How many have flowed back?
canadflyau said:Is letter 3 an original part of the flowthrough agreement? or was it added after?
canadflyau said:The ASM cap is part of AA's scope.. So Eagle pilots just plain object to it b/c the APA said we will provide scope relief so Eagle can operate jets beyond the ASM cap but the Capt positions created go to AA furloughees. Do I have that right?
canadflyau said:I couldn't agree with you more.. If you guys voted in the APA and out with ALPA do you think you could end the whipsaw and create a whole paradigm of problems even if the APA's true intent for Eagle pilots wasn't honerable...? That would be a big step toward one list in my opinion.
canadflyau said:I thought "FightTheFuture" was a battlecry to save our profession.
canadflyau said:.....it may hurt in the shorterm but our elders at these mainlines are trying to preserve the profession with scopes to keep mangements from doing this.. Meanwhile here we go dragging ourselves into court where they rule that Scopes are illegal.. and what have we done.. we have cut off the nose to spite our face.. and months later we see big bad Eagle (now being played by APA) up against some small and up and coming who is touting to AMR that they can do the same job as you guys for less.. and they mail off a letter stating this to your management. AMR likes what they see and says "lets get in bed" b/c since the pilots in their bickering have ruined scopes there is nothing that prevent them from using the new guys. and down and down and on it goes..
canadflyau said:... BUT HOW??? Maybe if AMR spent less time keeping you succesfully at eachothers throat some real progress would get made at the carrier that spends the most money in its operation that is not directly related to the revenue stream..